DUST Search - GROUPING (with External Corps)Limit is 4 to start

All Channels

General Discussions

GROUPING (with External Corps)Limit is 4 to start

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Zion Shad ZionTCD Legacy Rising 1620	Posted - 2012.08.12 20:14:00 - [1] - Quote Grouping and External Corps: With the coming of Grouping and Player created channels within in DUST 514, this is a time for External Corps to shine. ECs will be able to run their Corps off of their Contact list and created in game channels to better organize their teams and increase recruitment efforts. Quote: === Community Features === -Player created channels: Players can create private persistent chat channels and invite people to them. === Game Mode === - Persistent squads: players can create persistent squads out of battles and join battles as squads. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=30002 With squads you will be able to train in infantry combat more effectively and experiment with Squad builds. LogiGÇÖs will know play a more important role to your team with the added GÇ£Bleed OutGÇ¥ and GÇ£360 degreeGÇ¥ repair tool effect. Squad forming is also a great recruitment tool for when you find randoms in game looking for a group to run with and hang out. It can also be used as a "Try Out" tool. Squad leaders should focus on placing objectives on the map to not only give your team guidance, but also added SP bonuses as well. If you have any Squad input please post here and worthy tips will be added to OP. Presented by DUSTUniCon
Zion Shad ZionTCD Legacy Rising 1620	Posted - 2012.08.13 12:37:00 - [2] - Quote The logi of your group All from Patch Notes Quote: - The repair tool now has a 360 degree radius when locked - Remote repair no longer loses the target once it reaches full health - Reduced spawn time on drop uplinks - Codebreaker modules (reduced hacking times)
J'Jor Da'Wg KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 648	Posted - 2012.08.13 13:59:00 - [3] - Quote Too bad the groups are the dumbtarded size of 4. lolbf3squads It needs to be able to be a 12 person group as a full team. There should not be a 4 person limit. When 24 v 24 and 32 v 32 games are introduced, it should run full teams then too.
Mavado V Noriega SyNergy Gaming 2283	Posted - 2012.08.13 14:19:00 - [4] - Quote why is it even 4? squads are 6 ppl i made posts specifically tellin CCP NOT to make party system capped like BF3 if this is just for hisec games ok but if this is the actual system throughout then smh
Zion Shad ZionTCD Legacy Rising 1620	Posted - 2012.08.13 14:49:00 - [5] - Quote Please provide a link that confirms this, I have yet to see proof. Thanks
Jesse Jayne ZionTCD Legacy Rising 206	Posted - 2012.08.13 15:19:00 - [6] - Quote Good idea zion this should be something that all people trying run a corp should look at and share ideas. I would also like to see where they say only 4 people in a group I must have missed that.
Darky SI 232	Posted - 2012.08.13 15:53:00 - [7] - Quote Zion Shad wrote: Please provide a link that confirms this, I have yet to see proof. Thanks am pretty sure i did read that also somewhere but can't remember where i think it was in one of David Reid interviews, i hope its only beta thing and will get expanded on release
Zion Shad ZionTCD Legacy Rising 1620	Posted - 2012.08.13 16:21:00 - [8] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Some clarifications from IRC Specialist variant weapons are lightweight fitting types similar to the AUR weapons. LAV 'cvillian' will be the only one now once again. Dropship and HAVs militas are on the market at a cost. Isk rewards are increasing to adjust to new costs of EVERYTHING. Ad hock Squad Size is 4 Salvage is temproray loottable type and form the looks of it additonal sutff to added to patch notes.
Zion Shad ZionTCD Legacy Rising 1620	Posted - 2012.08.13 16:28:00 - [9] - Quote Jesse Jayne wrote: Good idea zion this should be something that all people trying run a corp should look at and share ideas. I would also like to see where they say only 4 people in a group I must have missed that. Thanks Jesse, and even with just 4 to a group (for now) it's better then fighting alone
J'Jor Da'Wg KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 648	Posted - 2012.08.13 16:32:00 - [10] - Quote Its still ridiculous, wait this long to play with my corp then find out I can't field an entire team. lolwut Corps and alliances being an entire focus of the game and being thrown in with a minimal system like this, should have been added a month ago.

Needless Sacermendor 98	Posted - 2012.08.13 17:54:00 - [11] - Quote Why can't people be happy with what they've got. I seriously doubt grouping will be limited to 4 mercs when an eve alliance contracts a dust corp to conquer a planet. You're being given a grouping system, SAY THANK YOU ! It's being restricted to 4, common sense would tell you that it's being tested as we are 'beta testers' and restricting the size of the groups will restrict the impact of them not working properly. However I am well aware that common sense isn't as common as the name would suggest, perhaps it should be renamed to rare sense ! As for "telling CCP" anything, unless you're a director, bring yourself down a peg or 3 and and use these forums to make suggestions and requests and then hope enough other people agree so CCP might consider it if they haven't already.
Maximus Stryker Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 393	Posted - 2012.08.13 18:47:00 - [12] - Quote 4 people is fine for now. You get the chance to play with friends consistently and test out how some teamwork will effect the game. A game of 12 guys who are all stacked and working together going against 12 randoms will likely provide little feedback to the developers. With limiting to a group of four, it can still be a fair shake for the 12 randoms and still provide some useful feedback to the devs. I am very happy with the grouping at 4 and am curious to see what groups we get: 1 of each class 4 of all the same 3 heavy and 1 logi 1 heavy, 2 assault and 1 logi many interesting combinations
Nu11u5 Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic 73	Posted - 2012.08.13 19:25:00 - [13] - Quote To be fair, real life traditional "fireteams" usually consist of 4 soldiers and is sufficient for tactical maneuvers. Having 4 players to a squad also conveniently factors into 24 player games (3 squads x2) and 32 player games (4 squads x2). What is needed is the ability for multiple squads to join the same match.
WT Sherman Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 63	Posted - 2012.08.13 20:03:00 - [14] - Quote What we need is what I have been bitching about on the forums but getting very little support fro the rest of you guys. We need in game corp functions and corp vs corp battles. We don't need to wait till the end of 2013 for the 00 patch with sov and district ownership before we get in game full corps much like EVE. There are a lot of people who were under the impression that they would be able to join a player corp right after creating their char and booting the game for the first time. There are also a good number of people who started Dust corps in EVE who are now going to be screwed because they aren't going to be able to join that corp with their Dust chars.
DPyro WSG Wraith Shadow Guards 12	Posted - 2012.08.16 21:25:00 - [15] - Quote Squads should be 8 per. 8x2 =16 + 16 for other team = 32. If they eventually get 64 players then it could be 8x4 per side.
SILENTSAM 69 Pro Hic Immortalis RISE of LEGION 421	Posted - 2012.08.16 21:48:00 - [16] - Quote The squad size is limited right now on purpose for testing right now. It will be increased later. Talking to a dev in the irc and he said the 4 player squads are to help test the matchmaking system.


Pages: 1 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.