| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
DC437
Osmon Surveillance
Caldari State
0
   |
Posted - 2012.08.02 01:22:00 -
[1] - Quote
some form of high speed very light armor cycles for fast point A to point B transportation other than dropships for personal or recon use. the stats i was thinking of were something around 100/hp 50/armor or something like that you could also have a light weapon like a sub machion gun or scrambler pistol
another idea as far as stealth goes would it be better as a suit molduel or a totality new drop suit and how will you balance the stats so its not OP to the point where people are running around invisible knifing people who don't have a clue whats going on?? |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
583
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 01:38:00 -
[2] - Quote
Right....because an LAV with Nanofibers isn't fast enough?
People really need to get over this motorcycle obsession... |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
1216
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 01:42:00 -
[3] - Quote
Well, of the 5 vehicle classes shown in the 2009 demo, one was a "Speeder", and Templar One mentions a type of jet propelled hoverbike, so I don't think the ideas are that far-fetched. |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
583
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 01:43:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:Well, of the 5 vehicle classes shown in the 2009 demo, one was a "Speeder", and Templar One mentions a type of jet propelled hoverbike, so I don't think the ideas are that far-fetched.
Im fine with that, Im just annoyed with people describing exactly what an LAV is, and then saying we need _______ to do that.
LAV with 3 nanofibers gets up to 54m/s I think, which is about 120mph. Lightpoles need to be nerfed before we get anything faster than that. |
Lord Sedto
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
25
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 02:12:00 -
[5] - Quote
would be cool to have a bike will you be able to use your weapon or would it have a weapon to use? I think they need more driver controlled vehicles but then again with the implementation of mechs and fighters/bombers? that kinda takes care of that right? Who needs the equivalent to a apache heli when you have a heavy mech? Heck I wanna see light and heavy mechs increase the map size and allow for SAM installations to be placed where defenders must not only be interested in protecting towers but also keeping there SAM sites operating. say you have 4 SAM sites placed on the map this helps attacking on the fighters and or bombers but a squad takes it over then it fires at your fighter/bombers. Brings a little more depth to the game after all sure you can ignore the SAM sites but if thats the case the attackers could destroy and/or take them over giving your air support a harder time and at the same time allowing there air support to run over your defensive holds.
Will fighters be able to do flybys and damage the MCC? If so then keeping those installations is important as well as having fighters to stop the other bombers/fighters getting through the parameter. Perhaps maybe even allowing DUST to take on another gaming level by having 12 mercs on the ground and 12 mercs in the air to fight it out?
|
Avenger 245
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
477
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 05:09:00 -
[6] - Quote
i not a big fan of figther and bombers(BF3) but one man MTAC and gunships are atleast being consider by CCP, however i dont think a bike would be very good the LAV should be the scouting/quick vehcile no need to make the LAV pointless, right now the LAV falls into the quick vehicle or mobile turrent platform and theres no need to make a another vehicle that takes away from the LAV uses. i |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |