DUST Search - Biomassed Episode 123: "Pokey Does the Whole Show"

All Channels

General Discussions

Biomassed Episode 123: "Pokey Does the Whole Show"

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Soraya Xel Random Gunz 6938	Posted - 2016.09.22 04:20:00 - [1] - Quote http://biomassed.net/2016/09/22/episode-123-pokey-does-the-whole-show/ Pokey and Soraya finally play Necropolis in co-op. We discuss the changes coming to The Division, what makes a game distinctively belong in the New Eden universe, and a whole lot more. CPM1 Elect. Thanks for all your support. [email protected] for ideas, thoughts, and feedback.
deadpool lifetone D3ATH CARD RUST415 288	Posted - 2016.09.22 05:53:00 - [2] - Quote . Done & Done . 123eps , big stuff . congrats . =ƒæÅ=ƒæÅ=ƒæÅ=ƒÄë=ƒÄë=ƒÄë ( F U!!!! ) * ( Why Dead? ) , (n+Æn+Çn+¢´)GÇón++pâçGòÉS+ÇX - - - - n++(º Gûí º l\|l)/
Pokey Dravon OSG Planetary Operations 8532	Posted - 2016.09.22 17:00:00 - [3] - Quote Wait do people actually listen to my voice every week? Do you hate yourselves? EVE: Phoenix - 'Rise Again' Trailer
deadpool lifetone D3ATH CARD RUST415 289	Posted - 2016.09.23 06:43:00 - [4] - Quote Ehhh not every week lol I would say , biomassed is 4th on my workout listening podcast list . Fantasy Focus , Mike Clay & Anita , The Herd , 2pac & then Biomassed lol ( F U!!!! ) * ( Why Dead? ) , (n+Æn+Çn+¢´)GÇón++pâçGòÉS+ÇX - - - - n++(º Gûí º l\|l)/

CCP LogicLoop C C P C C P Alliance 1894	Posted - 2016.09.23 06:52:00 - [5] - Quote Pokey Dravon wrote: Wait do people actually listen to my voice every week? Do you hate yourselves? I hate myself. Does that count? *Anything is possible given enough time.* CCP LogicLoop

Pokey Dravon OSG Planetary Operations 8535	Posted - 2016.09.23 13:35:00 - [6] - Quote CCP LogicLoop wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Wait do people actually listen to my voice every week? Do you hate yourselves? I hate myself. Does that count? Yes. So does Frame from what I hear. The self loathing at CCP must be strong. EVE: Phoenix - 'Rise Again' Trailer
Fox Gaden Immortal Guides 7849	Posted - 2016.09.23 15:39:00 - [7] - Quote Pokey's take on why Destiny bombed could easily be applied to DUST as well. - Hype was not lived up to. - Internal restructuring (Although in DustGÇÖs case it improved things) - Had to release the game when it was not well crafted. - Lack of experience with this type of game. - Trying a bit too hard to be unique rather than doing what other games did. - Will take a whole new game, mechanics rebuilt from the ground up, to make it good. Now take NOVA: - No Hype. Can't even get them to talk about it. - Lets hope Rettati sticks with it for continuity. (And because he knows better than anyone what is needed.) - Controlling scope (Get a good FPS ready for release before tackling vehicles and Planitary Conquest.) - They have all those lessens they learned from DUST on what works and what does not. - The first Demo may have looked generic, but it worked! Now they can build New Eden content on top of something that works. - Rebuilding the core mechanics, but get to reuse weapons stats and graphics. Looking at Nova that way could a person fell optimistic! Edit: Of course Destiny had great game mechanics, but did not have the content to hold you, while DUST could hold your interests but you had to put up with really rough game mechanics. Hand/Eye coordination cannot be taught. For everything else there is the Learning Coalition.
Maken Tosch Dust University Ivy League 13626	Posted - 2016.09.23 20:58:00 - [8] - Quote Fox Gaden wrote: Pokey's take on why Destiny bombed could easily be applied to DUST as well. - Hype was not lived up to. - Internal restructuring (Although in DustGÇÖs case it improved things) - Had to release the game when it was not well crafted. - Lack of experience with this type of game. - Trying a bit too hard to be unique rather than doing what other games did. - Will take a whole new game, mechanics rebuilt from the ground up, to make it good. Now take NOVA: - No Hype. Can't even get them to talk about it. - Lets hope Rettati sticks with it for continuity. (And because he knows better than anyone what is needed.) - Controlling scope (Get a good FPS ready for release before tackling vehicles and Planitary Conquest.) - They have all those lessens they learned from DUST on what works and what does not. - The first Demo may have looked generic, but it worked! Now they can build New Eden content on top of that. - Rebuilding the core mechanics, but get to reuse weapons stats and graphics. Looking at Nova that way could a person fell optimistic! Edit: Of course Destiny had great game mechanics, but did not have the content to hold you, while DUST could hold your interests but you had to put up with really rough game mechanics. Have all my likes. Eve Online Invite https://secure.eveonline.com/trial/?invc=ed64524f-15ca-4997-ab92-eaae0af74b7f&action=buddy
LOL KILLZ LulKlz 1153	Posted - 2016.09.23 23:38:00 - [9] - Quote Pokey Dravon wrote: Wait do people actually listen to my voice every week? Do you hate yourselves? Naughty naughty pokey. Dustkillz and chill
General Vahzz 859	Posted - 2016.09.24 03:47:00 - [10] - Quote I hate myself Pokey, but i hate you more G¥ñn+Å Bros before hoes The Original Bastard. The alt to end all alts.

Pokey Dravon OSG Planetary Operations 8538	Posted - 2016.09.24 06:45:00 - [11] - Quote Fox Gaden wrote: Pokey's take on why Destiny bombed could easily be applied to DUST as well. - Hype was not lived up to. - Internal restructuring (Although in DustGÇÖs case it improved things) - Had to release the game when it was not well crafted. - Lack of experience with this type of game. - Trying a bit too hard to be unique rather than doing what other games did. - Will take a whole new game, mechanics rebuilt from the ground up, to make it good. Now take NOVA: - No Hype. Can't even get them to talk about it. - Lets hope Rettati sticks with it for continuity. (And because he knows better than anyone what is needed.) - Controlling scope (Get a good FPS ready for release before tackling vehicles and Planitary Conquest.) - They have all those lessens they learned from DUST on what works and what does not. - The first Demo may have looked generic, but it worked! Now they can build New Eden content on top of that. - Rebuilding the core mechanics, but get to reuse weapons stats and graphics. Looking at Nova that way could a person fell optimistic! Edit: Of course Destiny had great game mechanics, but did not have the content to hold you, while DUST could hold your interests but you had to put up with really rough game mechanics. You have reached the first stage on the path to Boundless Optimism. Umbasa. EVE: Phoenix - 'Rise Again' Trailer
Mobius Wyvern Night Theifs Curatores Veritatis Alliance 8417	Posted - 2016.09.24 13:52:00 - [12] - Quote Pokey Dravon wrote: Fox Gaden wrote: Pokey's take on why Destiny bombed could easily be applied to DUST as well. - Hype was not lived up to. - Internal restructuring (Although in DustGÇÖs case it improved things) - Had to release the game when it was not well crafted. - Lack of experience with this type of game. - Trying a bit too hard to be unique rather than doing what other games did. - Will take a whole new game, mechanics rebuilt from the ground up, to make it good. Now take NOVA: - No Hype. Can't even get them to talk about it. - Lets hope Rettati sticks with it for continuity. (And because he knows better than anyone what is needed.) - Controlling scope (Get a good FPS ready for release before tackling vehicles and Planitary Conquest.) - They have all those lessens they learned from DUST on what works and what does not. - The first Demo may have looked generic, but it worked! Now they can build New Eden content on top of that. - Rebuilding the core mechanics, but get to reuse weapons stats and graphics. Looking at Nova that way could a person fell optimistic! Edit: Of course Destiny had great game mechanics, but did not have the content to hold you, while DUST could hold your interests but you had to put up with really rough game mechanics. You have reached the first stage on the path to Boundless Optimism. Umbasa. Infect them all. Leave not a cynic remaining. Amidst the blue skies A link from past to future The sheltering wings of the protector
Joel II X Bacon with a bottle of Quafe 10524	Posted - 2016.09.27 08:57:00 - [13] - Quote Mobius Wyvern wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Fox Gaden wrote: Pokey's take on why Destiny bombed could easily be applied to DUST as well. - Hype was not lived up to. - Internal restructuring (Although in DustGÇÖs case it improved things) - Had to release the game when it was not well crafted. - Lack of experience with this type of game. - Trying a bit too hard to be unique rather than doing what other games did. - Will take a whole new game, mechanics rebuilt from the ground up, to make it good. Now take NOVA: - No Hype. Can't even get them to talk about it. - Lets hope Rettati sticks with it for continuity. (And because he knows better than anyone what is needed.) - Controlling scope (Get a good FPS ready for release before tackling vehicles and Planitary Conquest.) - They have all those lessens they learned from DUST on what works and what does not. - The first Demo may have looked generic, but it worked! Now they can build New Eden content on top of that. - Rebuilding the core mechanics, but get to reuse weapons stats and graphics. Looking at Nova that way could a person fell optimistic! Edit: Of course Destiny had great game mechanics, but did not have the content to hold you, while DUST could hold your interests but you had to put up with really rough game mechanics. You have reached the first stage on the path to Boundless Optimism. Umbasa. Infect them all. Leave not a cynic remaining. Impossible. Resistance is too strong. *Scouts United* Gk.0s & Quafes all day.


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

The Original Bastard.