DUST Search - OFFICIAL REQUEST: not a lobby shooter

XxBlazikenxX wrote:

Mr.Pepe Le Pew wrote:

from the dookie demo we've seen, I come to the following thoughts:

Let me show you why none of your points are relevant. At all.

"-CCP is really not focused on making this game a top notch FPS."

Rattati wrote:

GÇ£This has to be a great shooter, before anything else,GÇ¥

"-Rattati and staff are on thin ice and are working hard for the bosses to even give Project NOva (PN) a shot."

Is this is even true, this means that they will be motivated to make Project Nova a success, considering their jobs are on the line. They will work hard to make it an fps that stands out.

"-CCP has failed, once again, to capitalize on a great idea of a game"

Quote:

There are much grander plans for Project Nova thoughGÇöplans that donGÇÖt at all come through from this little arena shooter demo. The long-term vision for Nova is to get back to the Dust 514 dream, blending Nova together with EVE Online.

"-It is a mediocre looking game with ideas such as: "getting away from planet battles, and see more of the EVE universe." In other words, we tried to reinvent the wheel and came up with triangular wheels that don't fuking work."

Quote:

Not in real-time, per se. +ürnason says that only GÇ£one percent of one percentGÇ¥ of EVE Online players ever used the real-time feedback aspects of Dust. But the idea of the Planetary Conquest mode, wherein corporations battled for control of planets, is something +ürnason wants to resurrect in NovaGÇöand more.

GÇ£What IGÇÖd like to do is some sort of economic link,GÇ¥ says +ürnason. In this hypothetical situation, he sees a corporation in EVE Online and in Nova linking up, potentially by way of a structure created in EVE, and then hooking together so each side gets money or other resources. GÇ£That future is all an open map,GÇ¥ says +ürnason. GÇ£We can do whatever we want, after we demonstrate the correct shooting mechanics.GÇ¥

And lol at your analogy that doesn't even make any since.

"-They need to show off the game and all they've been working on for the past 4 years soon or it will explode in their faces just like it did in 2014."

I searched up "Project Nova announced by CCP" and already found 5 large articles on it. I think it is fair to say it is receiving attention.

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Mr.Pepe Le Pew Mikramurka Shock Troop Minmatar Republic 364	Posted - 2016.04.21 18:00:00 - [1] - Quote from the dookie demo we've seen, I come to the following thoughts: -CCP is really not focused on making this game a top notch FPS. -Rattati and staff are on thin ice and are working hard for the bosses to even give Project NOva (PN) a shot. -CCP has failed, once again, to capitalize on a great idea of a game. -It is a mediocre looking game with ideas such as: "getting away from planet battles, and see more of the EVE universe." In other words, we tried to reinvent the wheel and came up with triangular wheels that don't fuking work. -They need to show off the game and all they've been working on for the past 4 years soon or it will explode in their faces just like it did in 2014.
Mr.Pepe Le Pew Mikramurka Shock Troop Minmatar Republic 365	Posted - 2016.04.22 03:19:00 - [2] - Quote XxBlazikenxX wrote: Mr.Pepe Le Pew wrote: from the dookie demo we've seen, I come to the following thoughts: Let me show you why none of your points are relevant. At all. "-CCP is really not focused on making this game a top notch FPS." Rattati wrote: GÇ£This has to be a great shooter, before anything else,GÇ¥ "-Rattati and staff are on thin ice and are working hard for the bosses to even give Project NOva (PN) a shot." Is this is even true, this means that they will be motivated to make Project Nova a success, considering their jobs are on the line. They will work hard to make it an fps that stands out. "-CCP has failed, once again, to capitalize on a great idea of a game" Quote: There are much grander plans for Project Nova thoughGÇöplans that donGÇÖt at all come through from this little arena shooter demo. The long-term vision for Nova is to get back to the Dust 514 dream, blending Nova together with EVE Online. "-It is a mediocre looking game with ideas such as: "getting away from planet battles, and see more of the EVE universe." In other words, we tried to reinvent the wheel and came up with triangular wheels that don't fuking work." Quote: Not in real-time, per se. +ürnason says that only GÇ£one percent of one percentGÇ¥ of EVE Online players ever used the real-time feedback aspects of Dust. But the idea of the Planetary Conquest mode, wherein corporations battled for control of planets, is something +ürnason wants to resurrect in NovaGÇöand more. GÇ£What IGÇÖd like to do is some sort of economic link,GÇ¥ says +ürnason. In this hypothetical situation, he sees a corporation in EVE Online and in Nova linking up, potentially by way of a structure created in EVE, and then hooking together so each side gets money or other resources. GÇ£That future is all an open map,GÇ¥ says +ürnason. GÇ£We can do whatever we want, after we demonstrate the correct shooting mechanics.GÇ¥ And lol at your analogy that doesn't even make any since. "-They need to show off the game and all they've been working on for the past 4 years soon or it will explode in their faces just like it did in 2014." I searched up "Project Nova announced by CCP" and already found 5 large articles on it. I think it is fair to say it is receiving attention. If you watched the interview, Rattati says they're extremely nervous as to how the game will be perceived. His ass is on the line, they're on thin ice, and apparently, the team at Shanghai has been either understaffed or slacking. The demo we saw is straight trash. A stinking Tech demo after years since Project Legion was announced, after Shanghai was occupied with the sequel. To be hopeful is to put a noose around one's own neck. I hate to be a pessimist, but CCP has conditioned me to think this way. Go with the trend they said. Take THE BEST FREAKING ASPECT OF DUST OUT OF P/NOVA aka MMO/ tier and skill tree.