DUST Search - What do you think?

All Channels

General Discussions

What do you think?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Union118 TH3 STRUGGL3 1	Posted - 2015.12.30 01:17:00 - [1] - Quote Would it be more fun if you could pick who you or your team fights against Or Smaller team battles. Personally i want both. Less proto on the field the less lag. Right? Also small team battles are a lot more fun. To many people on the field. Starter Fit Suits are OP :-)
Summa Militum Opus Arcana 1	Posted - 2015.12.30 01:34:00 - [2] - Quote I think if people could pick who they fight against then no one would fight the really good players. Thukker is Love, Thukker is Life
Union118 TH3 STRUGGL3 1	Posted - 2015.12.30 01:53:00 - [3] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: I think if people could pick who they fight against then no one would fight the really good players. Thats the point. They fight each other. Starter Fit Suits are OP :-)
Summa Militum Opus Arcana 1	Posted - 2015.12.30 02:17:00 - [4] - Quote Union118 wrote: Summa Militum wrote: I think if people could pick who they fight against then no one would fight the really good players. Thats the point. They fight each other. The good players already fight each other. If everyone else doesn't fight the good players then how is everyone else supposed to get better? Thukker is Love, Thukker is Life
Union118 TH3 STRUGGL3 1	Posted - 2015.12.30 02:37:00 - [5] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: Union118 wrote: Summa Militum wrote: I think if people could pick who they fight against then no one would fight the really good players. Thats the point. They fight each other. The good players already fight each other. If everyone else doesn't fight the good players then how is everyone else supposed to get better? Just play more fps games. I dont wanna play better players because everytime i do they lag out my match. Id rather play average players to have fun than better players and have no fun in the unfair struggling match with lag and hit detection. Starter Fit Suits are OP :-)
Pokey Dravon OSG Planetary Operations 7	Posted - 2015.12.30 03:50:00 - [6] - Quote Union118 wrote: Also small team battles are a lot more fun. To many people on the field. That's more a matter of opinion. MAG was my first FPS online so I came into this game wanting MAG sized battles. And while typically in MAG you never had a true 128 v 128 fight in one spot, you still had 32 v 32 regularly in the big game modes (And I think Escalation was 32v32v32), Ive always enjoy the sheer chaos of a lot of players in one spot actually duking it out. Felt much more like a warzone rather than mini skirmishes between a couple of players here and there. So I'm not saying you're wrong in your opinion, I just don't agree with it. "That little sh*t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati
Mobius Wyvern Fatal Absolution Bleeding Sun Conglomerate 7	Posted - 2015.12.30 05:30:00 - [7] - Quote Union118 wrote: Would it be more fun if you could pick who you or your team fights against Or Smaller team battles. Personally i want both. Less proto on the field the less lag. Right? Also small team battles are a lot more fun. To many people on the field. Your second point was part of the idea behind Arena battles. Those were supposed to be small matches using standard FPS game-modes that other players could spectate and gamble on, including EVE players. Amidst the blue skies A link from past to future The sheltering wings of the protector
Summa Militum Opus Arcana 2	Posted - 2015.12.30 07:17:00 - [8] - Quote Union118 wrote: Summa Militum wrote: Union118 wrote: Summa Militum wrote: I think if people could pick who they fight against then no one would fight the really good players. Thats the point. They fight each other. The good players already fight each other. If everyone else doesn't fight the good players then how is everyone else supposed to get better? Just play more fps games. I dont wanna play better players because everytime i do they lag out my match. Id rather play average players to have fun than better players and have no fun in the unfair struggling match with lag and hit detection. What does good players have to do with lag? Good players die due to lag issues all the time. Thukker is Love, Thukker is Life
Ggg Hjjhk BLUEBERRIES WITH AUTISM RUST415 12	Posted - 2015.12.30 07:42:00 - [9] - Quote 3 teams 8 players each 1 objective 5 mins before it randomly moves ?? profit Public APEX Punch
Immortal John Ripper 29	Posted - 2015.12.30 08:00:00 - [10] - Quote Ggg Hjjhk wrote: 3 teams 8 players each 1 objective 5 mins before it randomly moves ?? profit I kinda want to see this happen. 3 teams in 1 game lol. will two underpowered teams gang up on the pro team? will there be chaos??? Don't give me more likes. ReversePyschology

General John Ripper 29	Posted - 2015.12.30 08:00:00 - [11] - Quote Ggg Hjjhk wrote: 3 teams 8 players each 1 objective 5 mins before it randomly moves ?? profit I kinda want to see this happen. 3 teams in 1 game lol. will two underpowered teams gang up on the pro team? will there be chaos??? Don't give me more likes. ReversePyschology
Immortal John Ripper 29	Posted - 2015.12.30 08:01:00 - [12] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: What does good players have to do with lag? Good players die due to lag issues all the time. 2 words. Nyain San.... I still have nightmares of lag and rubber banding. Don't give me more likes. ReversePyschology
General John Ripper 29	Posted - 2015.12.30 08:01:00 - [13] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: What does good players have to do with lag? Good players die due to lag issues all the time. 2 words. Nyain San.... I still have nightmares of lag and rubber banding. Don't give me more likes. ReversePyschology
Ggg Hjjhk BLUEBERRIES WITH AUTISM RUST415 13	Posted - 2015.12.30 08:15:00 - [14] - Quote Immortal John Ripper wrote: Ggg Hjjhk wrote: 3 teams 8 players each 1 objective 5 mins before it randomly moves ?? profit I kinda want to see this happen. 3 teams in 1 game lol. will two underpowered teams gang up on the pro team? will there be chaos??? Right With team kill enabled >:D but i kinda wonder why no games do it?? like i think there are in CoD but not sure, maybe HALO. has to be a performance issue maybe?? Public APEX Punch
Summa Militum Opus Arcana 2	Posted - 2015.12.30 10:17:00 - [15] - Quote Ggg Hjjhk wrote: 3 teams 8 players each 1 objective 5 mins before it randomly moves ?? profit This is an awesome idea. +1 Thukker is Love, Thukker is Life
Union118 TH3 STRUGGL3 1	Posted - 2015.12.30 14:42:00 - [16] - Quote Pokey Dravon wrote: Union118 wrote: Also small team battles are a lot more fun. To many people on the field. That's more a matter of opinion. MAG was my first FPS online so I came into this game wanting MAG sized battles. And while typically in MAG you never had a true 128 v 128 fight in one spot, you still had 32 v 32 regularly in the big game modes (And I think Escalation was 32v32v32), Ive always enjoy the sheer chaos of a lot of players in one spot actually duking it out. Felt much more like a warzone rather than mini skirmishes between a couple of players here and there. So I'm not saying you're wrong in your opinion, I just don't agree with it. Thank you for the input. Dont get me wrong. I think big team battles are fun but dust cant handle it. I too have played MAG Raven tech looked high tech. Anyway we should have more options for smaller skirmishes as well as big ones. Starter Fit Suits are OP :-)
Union118 TH3 STRUGGL3 1	Posted - 2015.12.30 14:50:00 - [17] - Quote Immortal John Ripper wrote: Summa Militum wrote: What does good players have to do with lag? Good players die due to lag issues all the time. 2 words. Nyain San.... I still have nightmares of lag and rubber banding. When they were in their prime and before i biomassed i was only able to kill a few of them 1v1 and they were to hard to kill. It sucked cuz they all could go 1v3 and survive with their back against the wall. Why CCP allowed it is anyones guess. Starter Fit Suits are OP :-)
Pokey Dravon OSG Planetary Operations 7	Posted - 2015.12.30 15:02:00 - [18] - Quote Union118 wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Union118 wrote: Also small team battles are a lot more fun. To many people on the field. That's more a matter of opinion. MAG was my first FPS online so I came into this game wanting MAG sized battles. And while typically in MAG you never had a true 128 v 128 fight in one spot, you still had 32 v 32 regularly in the big game modes (And I think Escalation was 32v32v32), Ive always enjoy the sheer chaos of a lot of players in one spot actually duking it out. Felt much more like a warzone rather than mini skirmishes between a couple of players here and there. So I'm not saying you're wrong in your opinion, I just don't agree with it. Thank you for the input. Dont get me wrong. I think big team battles are fun but dust cant handle it. I too have played MAG Raven tech looked high tech. Anyway we should have more options for smaller skirmishes as well as big ones. Oh I think there should totally be the option for smaller battles, I just don't want it to be the only style of fight out there because I'm personally not a huge fan of small fights. "That little sh*t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati
deezy dabest IMPERIAL SPECIAL FORCES GROUP Evil Syndicate Alliance. 4	Posted - 2016.01.03 04:22:00 - [19] - Quote We need Dust to be the lobby shooter it has always been. Player created matches with variable gravity, variable damage, different game modes, and so on would have changed this game so much it is impossible to even imagine. Even if this had to be done through corporation sponsorship of matches to keep with lore it would be better than the current system. o7 All #514InTheWind
xavier zor II 294	Posted - 2016.01.03 04:24:00 - [20] - Quote Immortal John Ripper wrote: Summa Militum wrote: What does good players have to do with lag? Good players die due to lag issues all the time. 2 words. Nyain San.... I still have nightmares of lag and rubber banding. Hahahahhahhahahhahah this so much xavier zor's alt (biomassed) YouTube!

lamo guys Corrosive Synergy 168	Posted - 2016.01.03 06:03:00 - [21] - Quote Its just a crap shoot every time you play and nothing is going to change! Face it that's why so many good players left long ago. End of story, keep playing the way it is or don't. Don't blink it will be over quick
Union118 TH3 STRUGGL3 1	Posted - 2016.01.03 07:36:00 - [22] - Quote lamo guys wrote: Its just a crap shoot every time you play and nothing is going to change! Face it that's why so many good players left long ago. End of story, keep playing the way it is or don't. The truth hurts. Mind keeping the dmg to a minimal? Starter Fit Suits are OP :-)
Git Gud Bruh 0.P. 89	Posted - 2016.01.03 08:13:00 - [23] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: Union118 wrote: Summa Militum wrote: I think if people could pick who they fight against then no one would fight the really good players. Thats the point. They fight each other. The good players already fight each other. If everyone else doesn't fight the good players then how is everyone else supposed to get better? They could just git gud......bruh. "Militia Internet, Proto Lag" -Zandor Suzuki "Where's Taco?"- Ice Royal #IFoundTaco #TacoForCPM3
Git Gud Bruh 0.P. 89	Posted - 2016.01.03 08:18:00 - [24] - Quote Union118 wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Union118 wrote: Also small team battles are a lot more fun. To many people on the field. That's more a matter of opinion. MAG was my first FPS online so I came into this game wanting MAG sized battles. And while typically in MAG you never had a true 128 v 128 fight in one spot, you still had 32 v 32 regularly in the big game modes (And I think Escalation was 32v32v32), Ive always enjoy the sheer chaos of a lot of players in one spot actually duking it out. Felt much more like a warzone rather than mini skirmishes between a couple of players here and there. So I'm not saying you're wrong in your opinion, I just don't agree with it. Thank you for the input. Dont get me wrong. I think big team battles are fun but dust cant handle it. I too have played MAG Raven tech looked high tech. Anyway we should have more options for smaller skirmishes as well as big ones. AHEM!!!COUGHGHGHGHGHGHGH!!!!AHEMMMMMM!!!COUGH COUGH COUGH COUGH ITll handle a lot more ** than you think bruh, I have the one true morty right here, it'll open your mind to what dust can and cant do. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3061289#post3061289 COUGH COUGH!!!!! AHEM!!! COUGH COUGHHHHH "Militia Internet, Proto Lag" -Zandor Suzuki "Where's Taco?"- Ice Royal #IFoundTaco #TacoForCPM3**
Operative 1174 Uuali True Companion Planetary Requisitions 1	Posted - 2016.01.03 09:48:00 - [25] - Quote Corp battles, a distant memory. CCP logic GÇô We fix what doesn't need breaking.
Alena Asakura Caldari Logistics Reserve 227	Posted - 2016.01.03 11:31:00 - [26] - Quote Union118 wrote: Summa Militum wrote: Union118 wrote: Summa Militum wrote: I think if people could pick who they fight against then no one would fight the really good players. Thats the point. They fight each other. The good players already fight each other. If everyone else doesn't fight the good players then how is everyone else supposed to get better? Just play more fps games. I dont wanna play better players because everytime i do they lag out my match. Id rather play average players to have fun than better players and have no fun in the unfair struggling match with lag and hit detection. No this won't work. Maybe Dust is just another FPS to you, but there are significant differences, and I think most people would see it that way. You need to fight better Dust players to get better in Dust.


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.

ReversePyschology

ReversePyschology

ReversePyschology

ReversePyschology