| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Twelve Guage
Random Gunz
Rise Of Legion.
1
   |
Posted - 2015.12.21 19:14:00 -
[61] - Quote
It looks like CCP is still testing things again.
The Mistress of Massdrivers
Buying Council's Modified Repair Tool 4m ea
Check out my thread in player
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
21
|
Posted - 2015.12.21 20:15:00 -
[62] - Quote
What's the point of a 60 man battle if the end result is just that of another inane FW match?
Em shah tey et naGÇÖemsaer ek rahvi, amarr osedah gasi ubday pahk. Ekin tey vahka ijed div ema ziel. Et tey vamatal em.
|
SILENTSAM 69
KILL-EM-QUICK
Rise Of Legion.
825
|
Posted - 2015.12.21 22:28:00 -
[63] - Quote
I think CCP said long ago the game could handle 32 vs 32 right now, but that they decided to keep it 16 vs 16 for now.
It would have been a great idea if they started out with 32 vs 32 since most of the original player base came from MAG which had its smallest game mode playing 32 vs 32. 128 vs 128 was its max in case you were wondering. |
Joel II X
Bacon with a bottle of Quafe
9
|
Posted - 2015.12.22 02:28:00 -
[64] - Quote
No.
Scouts United
Gk.0s & Quafes all day.
|
GLOBAL RAGE
Consolidated Dust
199
|
Posted - 2015.12.22 06:33:00 -
[65] - Quote
Makuta Miserix wrote:KEROSIINI-TERO wrote:IMMORTAL WAR HERO wrote:
btw 2 3 years ago around that mabey i remember dust having 48 person multiplayer its why people were playing dust not battlefield
I have a faint memory of that as well. Now that I think it, this current 16+16 was a downgrade indeed from something. Dust has been 16v16 since I started playing, which was sometime during the private beta. It was planned that the gamee would move to 24v24, but it never happened. No clue how many players there were per match in the early days of private beta, so I can't comment on that.
I've experienced this happen a few ( 2 or 3 ) times, and have seen posts here regarding the same, then it gets fixed.
|
Jackkkkkkkkkkkkkkky jack
S.K.I.L.L OF G.O.D
General Tso's Alliance
539
|
Posted - 2015.12.22 07:31:00 -
[66] - Quote
santa claus' coming to dust :)
just found cal assault op^^
welcome to Taiwan ^^
|
Git Gud Bruh
Dead Man's Game
Preatoriani
47
|
Posted - 2015.12.22 08:43:00 -
[67] - Quote
Fox Gaden wrote:Chocol Mcdonnel wrote:Maybe CCP can make a special match where 40/50/60/however much players play in a single battle in the "Other Contracts" section and see if it can be implemented with little or no problems. Just like what they did with the portal things. There was some talk of that. I believe the idea was to use a smaller map to compensate for performance issues. And yes, I did read the part about the OP not experiencing performance issues, but that does not mean half the other people in the game wasn't, and it does not mean that he would not have performance issues if it happened again. I never have performance issues in the Research Facility socket, but I believe other people when they say they do.
I wouldn't say NO performance issues but it ran amazingly well for the amount of players and equipment spam...ran better than any PC against POK or SOG...just sayin'....they tend to (for some crazy reason) have the worst running PC's ever.
"Militia Internet, Proto Lag" -Zandor Suzuki
"To be fair"- viper xsniper
"Americ*nt"- TheD1CK
|
Git Gud Bruh
Dead Man's Game
Preatoriani
47
|
Posted - 2015.12.22 08:46:00 -
[68] - Quote
GLOBAL RAGE wrote:Makuta Miserix wrote:KEROSIINI-TERO wrote:IMMORTAL WAR HERO wrote:
btw 2 3 years ago around that mabey i remember dust having 48 person multiplayer its why people were playing dust not battlefield
I have a faint memory of that as well. Now that I think it, this current 16+16 was a downgrade indeed from something. Dust has been 16v16 since I started playing, which was sometime during the private beta. It was planned that the gamee would move to 24v24, but it never happened. No clue how many players there were per match in the early days of private beta, so I can't comment on that. I've experienced this happen a few ( 2 or 3 ) times, and have seen posts here regarding the same, then it gets fixed.
Pics or it didn't happen lol
"Militia Internet, Proto Lag" -Zandor Suzuki
"To be fair"- viper xsniper
"Americ*nt"- TheD1CK
|
Maitue Mae
Vader's-Fist
161
|
Posted - 2015.12.22 08:52:00 -
[69] - Quote
I NEED THIS IN MY LIFE. PLEASE.
My Boots yearn to crush clones brought to my feet from my Rifle. Tell me where to go to fulfill their request.
|
Git Gud Bruh
Dead Man's Game
Preatoriani
48
|
Posted - 2015.12.22 08:53:00 -
[70] - Quote
True Adamance wrote: What's the point of a 60 man battle if the end result is just that of another inane FW match?
Twice as many scrubs to slay is twice as much fun in my book any day of the week.
"Militia Internet, Proto Lag" -Zandor Suzuki
"To be fair"- viper xsniper
"Americ*nt"- TheD1CK
|
|
|
Satanic Fister
Paladin Survey Force
Amarr Empire
39
|
Posted - 2015.12.22 16:18:00 -
[71] - Quote
Enlightened Cola wrote:ew, how care bear have these forums become?
No wonder HTFU and Adapt or Die stopped having meaning. You GD plebs should feel bad.
Not care bear enough to give a **** about a washed up old perma banned scrub like you
"It's like a porcupine with down syndrome... you know it wants hugs but they don't know the pain they cause..."
|
ANON Cerberus
TerranProtossZerg
973
|
Posted - 2015.12.22 18:49:00 -
[72] - Quote
Damn son!
Ok so I have personally witnessed 17-18 players on a side before once or twice but 30 odd on each team!? Give us 64 player battles CCP!!
Damn just imagine 64 player dust on a non-terrible console or PC! My wallet would be empty I tell you. |
Sbundo'D
Dead Meta Game
98
|
Posted - 2015.12.23 11:13:00 -
[73] - Quote
Satanic Fister wrote:Enlightened Cola wrote:ew, how care bear have these forums become?
No wonder HTFU and Adapt or Die stopped having meaning. You GD plebs should feel bad. Not care bear enough to give a **** about a washed up old perma banned scrub like you
Well, apart from you.. so keen to reply to him 
CCP.. what is going on with this ?? glitch ? bug ? answer to the prayer of Minmatar ghetto babies ??
|
DIinkelFritz
The Eternal Noxium Imperium
25
|
Posted - 2015.12.29 04:30:00 -
[74] - Quote
Git Gud Bruh wrote:Enlightened Cola wrote:19 + 29 doesn't = 64.
I hope you shoot better then you can count, lol. OH wow you can ******* add! That's crazy! HEY EVERYBODY!!!! THIS GUY CAN LOOK AT TWO NUMBERS AND PUT EM TOGETHER!
No he can't, or else he would see that 1,929 is greater than 60.
Committed suicide....again...
Portdust514 #Port my Dick
|
Sylwester Dziewiecki
534
|
Posted - 2015.12.29 10:11:00 -
[75] - Quote
I'm objectively looking at this. You said that people came and leave, so it do not sound like something stable, reliable, and solid. I'm not against increasing player count per match, but it's definitely not for each map and game mode we have. Increasing player count in some matches would actually save them.
Safest way to implement it at the beginning, would be Academy matches. Who ever try to run new character know that beginners do not know what to do on field, and it takes them a lot of time to start fighting for point. They are all in militia assets, and starting suits, they do not have SKINS, fancy looking weapons, tons of uplinks, nanohives etc. So my intuition is telling me that they are group of players from entire playerbase that cause lowest amount of laags
This is Skirmish v1.0
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |