DUST Search - YES!!! (And ranking system)

All Channels

General Discussions

YES!!! (And ranking system)

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Lightning35 Delta514 The Warlords Legion 2	Posted - 2015.12.04 02:19:00 - [1] - Quote So, I got promoted today in NJROTC! C/PO!!!! (Cadet Chief Petty Officer! E-7. NS2) Was happy, and then I thought about dust. WHEN CAN WE GET A GOOD RANKING SYSTEM??? Seriously. How hard can it be? We need a ranking system that puts players of same rank together. It's the best way to improve matchmaking. You don't even have to go so far since many tank names are already taken. Just add simple ranks like, 4- (gonna use USNA ranks cuz Amarr fleet (navy) Gallente marines (under dep. of navy, mostly navy, you get the point) Recruit- new players- 0-10m SP Petty Officer- experienced players- 10-30m SP Chief Petty Officers- Advanced players- 30-50m SP Officers- Veteran players- 50m+ SP. How hard can it be? You have all your starter fit noobs playing all together, all your basic gear players playing together, your advanced gear players against each other, and the proto and officer stompers together. No more officers stomping recruits, PO, and CPO. Support or nah? And GO NAVY!!! U.S.N.A- (future naval pilot!) CEO of T-W-L Gallente Loyalist- Ion Pistol for LIFE! GALLENTE!!! FREEDOM!!! QUAFE!!!
postapo wastelander Corrosive Synergy 2	Posted - 2015.12.04 02:29:00 - [2] - Quote Lightning35 Delta514 wrote: So, I got promoted today in NJROTC! C/PO!!!! (Cadet Chief Petty Officer! E-7. NS2) Was happy, and then I thought about dust. WHEN CAN WE GET A GOOD RANKING SYSTEM??? Seriously. How hard can it be? We need a ranking system that puts players of same rank together. It's the best way to improve matchmaking. You don't even have to go so far since many tank names are already taken. Just add simple ranks like, 4- (gonna use USNA ranks cuz Amarr fleet (navy) Gallente marines (under dep. of navy, mostly navy, you get the point) Recruit- new players- 0-10m SP Petty Officer- experienced players- 10-30m SP Chief Petty Officers- Advanced players- 30-50m SP Officers- Veteran players- 50m+ SP. How hard can it be? You have all your starter fit noobs playing all together, all your basic gear players playing together, your advanced gear players against each other, and the proto and officer stompers together. No more officers stomping recruits, PO, and CPO. Support or nah? And GO NAVY!!! U.S.N.A- (future naval pilot!) Congratz but be carefull. You know, heroes are useless in coffins ;) *"Im original Boii Boyko"*
DAAAA BEAST Corrosive Synergy 3	Posted - 2015.12.04 02:55:00 - [3] - Quote Lightning35 Delta514 wrote: WHEN CAN WE GET A GOOD RANKING SYSTEM??? THE EOM LEADERBOARD IS PRETTY GOOD , YOU HEAR ME ? Prisoner of all memories. [ ... ]
Diablo Gamekeeper Anunnakii 742	Posted - 2015.12.04 03:04:00 - [4] - Quote nice im po2 22-6 vs Ancient Exiles A-Team. Your move Marauder. Rainbow Dash CCP Broke my link
Xenu Khanid ScReWeD uP InC Devil's Descendants 6	Posted - 2015.12.04 03:36:00 - [5] - Quote DAAAA BEAST wrote: Lightning35 Delta514 wrote: WHEN CAN WE GET A GOOD RANKING SYSTEM??? THE EOM LEADERBOARD IS PRETTY GOOD , YOU HEAR ME ? *holds hand up to ear I CAN'T HEAR YOU, CAN YOU SPEAK UP
sir RAVEN WING RabbitGang 13 COILS 5	Posted - 2015.12.04 03:44:00 - [6] - Quote Xenu Khanid wrote: DAAAA BEAST wrote: Lightning35 Delta514 wrote: WHEN CAN WE GET A GOOD RANKING SYSTEM??? THE EOM LEADERBOARD IS PRETTY GOOD , YOU HEAR ME ? *holds hand up to ear I CAN'T HEAR YOU, CAN YOU SPEAK UP I THINK HE SAID THE AHOM LEDERHOSEN IS PRETTY GOOD. =ƒç+=ƒç¬ Retired Merc... for now.
sir RAVEN WING RabbitGang 13 COILS 5	Posted - 2015.12.04 03:46:00 - [7] - Quote Lightning35 Delta514 wrote: So, I got promoted today in NJROTC! C/PO!!!! (Cadet Chief Petty Officer! E-7. NS2) Was happy, and then I thought about dust. WHEN CAN WE GET A GOOD RANKING SYSTEM??? Seriously. How hard can it be? We need a ranking system that puts players of same rank together. It's the best way to improve matchmaking. You don't even have to go so far since many tank names are already taken. Just add simple ranks like, 4- (gonna use USNA ranks cuz Amarr fleet (navy) Gallente marines (under dep. of navy, mostly navy, you get the point) Recruit- new players- 0-10m SP Petty Officer- experienced players- 10-30m SP Chief Petty Officers- Advanced players- 30-50m SP Officers- Veteran players- 50m+ SP. How hard can it be? You have all your starter fit noobs playing all together, all your basic gear players playing together, your advanced gear players against each other, and the proto and officer stompers together. No more officers stomping recruits, PO, and CPO. Support or nah? And GO NAVY!!! U.S.N.A- (future naval pilot!) Good for you, mate. On to your idea, it is actually a good idea that has been suggested countless times before, a few times even by me. No real responses from what I have seen, though I never stick around it too long. =ƒç+=ƒç¬ Retired Merc... for now.
Breakin Stuff Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group 12	Posted - 2015.12.04 04:15:00 - [8] - Quote Lightning35 Delta514 wrote: And GO NAVY!!! U.S.N.A- (future naval pilot!) GO TAXI! Errr. NAVY! Yes, I totally don't consider naval ships to be large taxis for marine companies... totally... WoW has taught me that Purple means Legendary. This means Quafe suits are the optimal loadout for killing all of you.
Symbioticforks Ancient Exiles. Bleeding Sun Conglomerate 1	Posted - 2015.12.04 04:48:00 - [9] - Quote I'm an officer in Dust 514. There's your ranking system. You know sniping is bad when even I refuse to do it.
Union118 TH3 STRUGGL3 1	Posted - 2015.12.04 13:50:00 - [10] - Quote sir RAVEN WING wrote: Xenu Khanid wrote: DAAAA BEAST wrote: Lightning35 Delta514 wrote: WHEN CAN WE GET A GOOD RANKING SYSTEM??? THE EOM LEADERBOARD IS PRETTY GOOD , YOU HEAR ME ? *holds hand up to ear I CAN'T HEAR YOU, CAN YOU SPEAK UP I THINK HE SAID THE AHOM LEDERHOSEN IS PRETTY GOOD. I AM SHOUTING TOO! :D Starter Fit Suits are OP :-)

Lightning35 Delta514 The Warlords Legion 2	Posted - 2015.12.04 14:27:00 - [11] - Quote Union118 wrote: sir RAVEN WING wrote: Xenu Khanid wrote: DAAAA BEAST wrote: Lightning35 Delta514 wrote: WHEN CAN WE GET A GOOD RANKING SYSTEM??? THE EOM LEADERBOARD IS PRETTY GOOD , YOU HEAR ME ? holds hand up to ear I CAN'T HEAR YOU, CAN YOU SPEAK UP I THINK HE SAID THE AHOM LEDERHOSEN IS PRETTY GOOD. I AM SHOUTING TOO! :D LET ME JOIN ALONG AS WELL!!! :D* CEO of T-W-L Gallente Loyalist- Ion Pistol for LIFE! GALLENTE!!! FREEDOM!!! QUAFE!!!
Radiant Pancake3 2	Posted - 2015.12.04 18:10:00 - [12] - Quote Considering they couldn't even give out a rep tool, very hard. "Pancake is a corp hopping forum troll, that's his excuse." - bane sieg Min Loyalist
Mortishai Belmont G.L.O.R.Y Shadow of Dust 1	Posted - 2015.12.04 18:12:00 - [13] - Quote I honestly think there is just not enough people playing the game to segregate the community like that. You want to play 5vs5 matches all day long? The C.E.O. of G.L.O.R.Y, (~..)~ Now on Youtube ~(..~)
Lightning35 Delta514 The Warlords Legion 2	Posted - 2015.12.04 19:20:00 - [14] - Quote Mortishai Belmont wrote: I honestly think there is just not enough people playing the game to segregate the community like that. You want to play 5vs5 matches all day long? I've had matches like that that were balanced. I honestly wouldn't mind As long as I don't have to be put on matches where enemy leaves or I have I carry my team and I am left to be stomped, I don't mind. CEO of T-W-L Gallente Loyalist- Ion Pistol for LIFE! GALLENTE!!! FREEDOM!!! QUAFE!!!
Mortishai Belmont G.L.O.R.Y Shadow of Dust 1	Posted - 2015.12.04 19:35:00 - [15] - Quote Lightning35 Delta514 wrote: Mortishai Belmont wrote: I honestly think there is just not enough people playing the game to segregate the community like that. You want to play 5vs5 matches all day long? I've had matches like that that were balanced. I honestly wouldn't mind As long as I don't have to be put on matches where enemy leaves or I have I carry my team and I am left to be stomped, I don't mind. If it were a CQC map, I wouldn't mind either lol. The C.E.O. of G.L.O.R.Y, (~..)~ Now on Youtube ~(..~)
deezy dabest IMPERIAL SPECIAL FORCES GROUP Evil Syndicate Alliance. 4	Posted - 2015.12.04 20:33:00 - [16] - Quote Lightning35 Delta514 wrote: So, I got promoted today in NJROTC! C/PO!!!! (Cadet Chief Petty Officer! E-7. NS2) Was happy, and then I thought about dust. WHEN CAN WE GET A GOOD RANKING SYSTEM??? Seriously. How hard can it be? We need a ranking system that puts players of same rank together. It's the best way to improve matchmaking. You don't even have to go so far since many tank names are already taken. Just add simple ranks like, 4- (gonna use USNA ranks cuz Amarr fleet (navy) Gallente marines (under dep. of navy, mostly navy, you get the point) Recruit- new players- 0-10m SP Petty Officer- experienced players- 10-30m SP Chief Petty Officers- Advanced players- 30-50m SP Officers- Veteran players- 50m+ SP. How hard can it be? You have all your starter fit noobs playing all together, all your basic gear players playing together, your advanced gear players against each other, and the proto and officer stompers together. No more officers stomping recruits, PO, and CPO. Support or nah? And GO NAVY!!! U.S.N.A- (future naval pilot!) Congrats on the promotion. As far as ranking goes this was pretty much what loyalty ranks were suppose to be but the formula got scrooged in favor of AUR spending. Show there is a future #CCPSpeakOn514
Black Eagle495 Brutor Vanguard Minmatar Republic 22	Posted - 2015.12.04 22:03:00 - [17] - Quote we pretty much got that with loyalty ranks but yea a better ranking system would be nice. how about a non-linear ranking system (meaning the possibility of ranking to a lower rank) where the ranks would security ratings 1.0 - 0.0. 1.0 being a newbro and 0.0 being the best there is. 0.0 should be very very difficult to achieve. These could be based of off k/m, wp/m and w/l ratio. ranking would be affected by the quality of opponents. for example a 0.1 beating down on a bunch of 1.0 mercs wouldn't gain much if any progress and wouldn't hurt the 1.0 merc's ranking much while at the same time if the 0.1 merc keeps getting killed (bleed out) by those 1.0 it would have a significantly negative impact on his ranking and have very positive affect on the 1.0 merc. logi's would be able to use the wp/m metric to advance encouraging them to help as many as possible safely. low/inactivity would generally have a negative impact on rating (esp at~ sub 0.6.) rating would be account wide. this would generally encourage players to want to get better at the game rather than just having a linear ranking system that just tells people how long you've played. matches could be balance using this by averaging team's security risk rating. idk just thought this up just now.
xxwhitedevilxx M Maphia Clan Corporation 3	Posted - 2015.12.04 23:23:00 - [18] - Quote I remember suggesting something like this 3 years ago... I was pretty much referring to MGO rank system (the weekly one) with "special" badges for what you do the most in battles. Or like the "General" system in battlefield and so on. The ranking system now is way too much a "fidelty" rank, not a real indicator of what you do best! The possibilities are infinite: "punishing" whoever leave too many battles with a "shame" badge would be great or the afkers. take time or take aurums (Gò»#-_-)Gò»~~~GòºGòÉGòº [FSTNM SCDNM]
Viktor Hadah Jr 0uter.Heaven 9	Posted - 2015.12.04 23:25:00 - [19] - Quote Symbioticforks wrote: I'm an officer in Dust 514. There's your ranking system. ^This guy nose, there are only two ranks in dust. Those who are officers, and those who are not. I'm kind of a big deal. Buying dead and inactive corporations
Death Shadow117 Wolf Pack Special Forces Rise Of Legion. 903	Posted - 2015.12.04 23:30:00 - [20] - Quote We have people with over 100 mail sp and you stop at officer? Those my good sir are the elites and need to be re' spected.

Black Eagle495 Brutor Vanguard Minmatar Republic 22	Posted - 2015.12.04 23:33:00 - [21] - Quote xxwhitedevilxx M wrote: I remember suggesting something like this 3 years ago... I was pretty much referring to MGO rank system (the weekly one) with "special" badges for what you do the most in battles. Or like the "General" system in battlefield and so on. The ranking system now is way too much a "fidelty" rank, not a real indicator of what you do best! The possibilities are infinite: "punishing" whoever leave too many battles with a "shame" badge would be great or the afkers. yeah i was thinking about the system in mgo2 too. it would be cool to have something that shows that you excel at something.
Death Shadow117 Wolf Pack Special Forces Rise Of Legion. 903	Posted - 2015.12.04 23:34:00 - [22] - Quote Black Eagle495 wrote: we pretty much got that with loyalty ranks but yea a better ranking system would be nice. how about a non-linear ranking system (meaning the possibility of ranking to a lower rank) where the ranks would security ratings 1.0 - 0.0. 1.0 being a newbro and 0.0 being the best there is. 0.0 should be very very difficult to achieve. These could be based of off k/m, wp/m and w/l ratio. ranking would be affected by the quality of opponents. for example a 0.1 beating down on a bunch of 1.0 mercs wouldn't gain much if any progress and wouldn't hurt the 1.0 merc's ranking much while at the same time if the 0.1 merc keeps getting killed (bleed out) by those 1.0 it would have a significantly negative impact on his ranking and have very positive affect on the 1.0 merc. logi's would be able to use the wp/m metric to advance encouraging them to help as many as possible safely. low/inactivity would generally have a negative impact on rating (esp at~ sub 0.6.) rating would be account wide. this would generally encourage players to want to get better at the game rather than just having a linear ranking system that just tells people how long you've played. matches could be balance using this by averaging team's security risk rating. idk just thought this up just now. Wow. Now find a way to code that into dust and send it to CCP maybe if they get a finished product first they'll know what it should look like
Black Eagle495 Brutor Vanguard Minmatar Republic 22	Posted - 2015.12.05 01:13:00 - [23] - Quote Death Shadow117 wrote: Wow. Now find a way to code that into dust and send it to CCP maybe if they get a finished product first they'll know what it should look like well they already do something similar with the MU stuff. I assume all they'd have to do is change a few variables to the equation and display it (prob wrong) .
Kalante Schiffer Ancient Exiles. 1	Posted - 2015.12.05 01:32:00 - [24] - Quote I wouldn't call anyone elite just because they have over 100m sp. How unoriginal would that be.
Lightning35 Delta514 The Warlords Legion 2	Posted - 2015.12.05 02:58:00 - [25] - Quote Kalante Schiffer wrote: I wouldn't call anyone elite just because they have over 100m sp. How unoriginal would that be. Well....... You have a point..... There are people on leaderboards that have over that amount but with boosters etc. and most true elites have left the game. CEO of T-W-L Gallente Loyalist- Ion Pistol for LIFE! GALLENTE!!! FREEDOM!!! QUAFE!!!
Russel Mendoza Klandatu 337	Posted - 2015.12.05 05:11:00 - [26] - Quote Lightning35 Delta514 wrote: So, I got promoted today in NJROTC! C/PO!!!! (Cadet Chief Petty Officer! E-7. NS2) Was happy, and then I thought about dust. WHEN CAN WE GET A GOOD RANKING SYSTEM??? Seriously. How hard can it be? We need a ranking system that puts players of same rank together. It's the best way to improve matchmaking. You don't even have to go so far since many tank names are already taken. Just add simple ranks like, 4- (gonna use USNA ranks cuz Amarr fleet (navy) Gallente marines (under dep. of navy, mostly navy, you get the point) Recruit- new players- 0-10m SP Petty Officer- experienced players- 10-30m SP Chief Petty Officers- Advanced players- 30-50m SP Officers- Veteran players- 50m-100m SP. Elite Officers- veteran players-100m+ How hard can it be? You have all your starter fit noobs playing all together, all your basic gear players playing together, your advanced gear players against each other, and the proto and officer stompers together. No more officers stomping recruits, PO, and CPO. Support or nah? And GO NAVY!!! U.S.N.A- (future naval pilot!) according to this my rank is veeteran officer, nyahahaha I'm the biggest Dustard in the universe!!! Summoning technique "Gorgon no jutsu" Vehicle request accepted.
Happy Violentime 1	Posted - 2015.12.05 23:55:00 - [27] - Quote Lightning35 Delta514 wrote: So, I got promoted today in NJROTC! C/PO!!!! (Cadet Chief Petty Officer! E-7. NS2) Was happy, and then I thought about dust. WHEN CAN WE GET A GOOD RANKING SYSTEM??? Seriously. How hard can it be? We need a ranking system that puts players of same rank together. It's the best way to improve matchmaking. You don't even have to go so far since many tank names are already taken. Just add simple ranks like, 4- (gonna use USNA ranks cuz Amarr fleet (navy) Gallente marines (under dep. of navy, mostly navy, you get the point) Recruit- new players- 0-10m SP Petty Officer- experienced players- 10-30m SP Chief Petty Officers- Advanced players- 30-50m SP Officers- Veteran players- 50m-100m SP. Elite Officers- veteran players-100m+ How hard can it be? You have all your starter fit noobs playing all together, all your basic gear players playing together, your advanced gear players against each other, and the proto and officer stompers together. No more officers stomping recruits, PO, and CPO. Support or nah? And GO NAVY!!! U.S.N.A- (future naval pilot!) Apart from the low player base this wouldn't work for 1 reason. makes new character, stomps noobs all day
Lightning35 Delta514 The Warlords Legion 2	Posted - 2015.12.06 00:02:00 - [28] - Quote Happy Violentime wrote: Lightning35 Delta514 wrote: So, I got promoted today in NJROTC! C/PO!!!! (Cadet Chief Petty Officer! E-7. NS2) Was happy, and then I thought about dust. WHEN CAN WE GET A GOOD RANKING SYSTEM??? Seriously. How hard can it be? We need a ranking system that puts players of same rank together. It's the best way to improve matchmaking. You don't even have to go so far since many tank names are already taken. Just add simple ranks like, 4- (gonna use USNA ranks cuz Amarr fleet (navy) Gallente marines (under dep. of navy, mostly navy, you get the point) Recruit- new players- 0-10m SP Petty Officer- experienced players- 10-30m SP Chief Petty Officers- Advanced players- 30-50m SP Officers- Veteran players- 50m-100m SP. Elite Officers- veteran players-100m+ How hard can it be? You have all your starter fit noobs playing all together, all your basic gear players playing together, your advanced gear players against each other, and the proto and officer stompers together. No more officers stomping recruits, PO, and CPO. Support or nah? And GO NAVY!!! U.S.N.A- (future naval pilot!) Apart from the low player base this wouldn't work for 1 reason. makes new character, stomps noobs all day Limit each PSN. Won't stop (just create new account) but will reduce. (To lazy, too much work) CEO of T-W-L Gallente Loyalist- Ion Pistol for LIFE! GALLENTE!!! FREEDOM!!! QUAFE!!!


Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Rainbow Dash

You know sniping is bad when even I refuse to do it.