| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Text Grant
PIanet Express
444
   |
Posted - 2015.11.27 03:56:00 -
[1] - Quote
1 give swarms original travel distance. 500 meters?
2 allow instant lock on to anything actively scanned
3 give swarms a scan precision that is changed by the skills, and modules.
4 give vehicles a scan profile, visible in the fitting screen
5 add a vehicle profile dampener module.
6 scan profile should change by distance. A vehicle with a 200 db against a swarmer with 50 db and a 50 meter scan radius should be able to lock on out to about 200 meters. Just an estimate. I'm sure there is already a formula such as this on EVE. But a vehicle that is actively scanned should be able to be locked on to instantly even through buildings, or terrain.
This should be used to help balance the fact that up till this point, an AV buff hurt dropship pilots, and LAV drivers, while a AV nerf made tanks OP. After this, dropships chould be buffed or nerfed individually from tanks, or LAV's by simply changing their DB |
shanatak
Prima Gallicus
45
|
Posted - 2015.11.27 14:06:00 -
[2] - Quote
Seriously are you serious???
And why not 12 missiles in the swarm ? |
tritan abbattere
DBAG CORE
71
|
Posted - 2015.11.27 20:49:00 -
[3] - Quote
I don;'t think active scanning should = a instant lock but this would be great other wise. Active scan could make the vehicle db bigger.
I am the all mighty Tritan. Fear me for I am a MassHole
|
Raven-747
WarRavens
Imperium Eden
245
|
Posted - 2015.11.28 02:02:00 -
[4] - Quote
Dying
When you headshot a frontline with proto
|
Text Grant
OSG Planetary Operations
446
|
Posted - 2015.12.05 12:56:00 -
[5] - Quote
This would make it take 2 players to kill a tank effectively without actually changing anything else in place |
Zan Azikuchi
G.R.A.V.E
The Ditanian Alliance
310
|
Posted - 2015.12.05 19:14:00 -
[6] - Quote
tritan abbattere wrote:I don;'t think active scanning should = a instant lock but this would be great other wise. Active scan could make the vehicle db bigger.
Well to be fair, it'd be the same as using a PLD (Personal Laser Designator) and "painting" the target for anti vehicle weaponry, but instead of instant lock (as that would be ridiculous, can't explain why though, but I feel that would break future immersion), let it lock on in like, .10 seconds, that way there's some time at least when you fire (this is coming from a Battlefield 4 Player, just letting you know this now, and anyone that's played this know's where I am coming from with this), it's future technology, and scanning should be able to help out a little more than just finding enemy vehicles you can't harm.
When there is light, shadow's lurk and fear reign's... Yet by the blade of knight's, mankind, was given hope.
|
Text Grant
OSG Planetary Operations
446
|
Posted - 2015.12.08 22:07:00 -
[7] - Quote
Zan Azikuchi wrote:tritan abbattere wrote:I don;'t think active scanning should = a instant lock but this would be great other wise. Active scan could make the vehicle db bigger. Well to be fair, it'd be the same as using a PLD (Personal Laser Designator) and "painting" the target for anti vehicle weaponry, but instead of instant lock (as that would be ridiculous, can't explain why though, but I feel that would break future immersion), let it lock on in like, .10 seconds, that way there's some time at least when you fire (this is coming from a Battlefield 4 Player, just letting you know this now, and anyone that's played this know's where I am coming from with this), it's future technology, and scanning should be able to help out a little more than just finding enemy vehicles you can't harm.
This is my feeling, and this would help seperate swarm balance against different vehicle types |
Text Grant
OSG Planetary Operations
447
|
Posted - 2015.12.15 16:54:00 -
[8] - Quote
tritan abbattere wrote:I don;'t think active scanning should = a instant lock but this would be great other wise. Active scan could make the vehicle db bigger.
Why? It's a 2 player system at this point. |
Kallas Hallytyr
Skullbreakers
1
|
Posted - 2015.12.16 21:47:00 -
[9] - Quote
Text Grant wrote:tritan abbattere wrote:I don;'t think active scanning should = a instant lock but this would be great other wise. Active scan could make the vehicle db bigger. Why? It's a 2 player system at this point.
Because no suit can carry Swarms and Scans right?
Oh, wait...
Alt of Halla Murr. Sentinel.
|
Text Grant
OSG Planetary Operations
448
|
Posted - 2015.12.17 16:35:00 -
[10] - Quote
Kallas Hallytyr wrote:Text Grant wrote:tritan abbattere wrote:I don;'t think active scanning should = a instant lock but this would be great other wise. Active scan could make the vehicle db bigger. Why? It's a 2 player system at this point. Because no suit can carry Swarms and Scans right? Oh, wait...
Not very effectively. Assault swarm with scans- no ammo. Commando with swarms and scans- no ammo. Sentinel- impossible. Logi with swarms and scans- no sidearm. The only viable options are: scout(dead), basic variant medium suits(no racial bonus), or Amarr logi(worst logi slot layout) |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |