DUST Search - matchmaking

All Channels

General Discussions

matchmaking

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
YUUKI TERUMI Capital Acquisitions LLC 164	Posted - 2015.11.26 14:17:00 - [1] - Quote Pretty easy. Eberybody complaining about matchmaking. In every single pub only a 4men/8men squad is allowed. No blueberries. Usually a match is unbalanced because there are 2+ squads on one side and barely one squad on the other team. If we only have one squad on each side and no blueberries... it should be ok and people cant blame their team if they lose. Also, please allow us to leave and rejoin a battle so we dont have to leave because of lag Gal assault rof buff \0/ PortDust514
Professor Mehaffey Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 30	Posted - 2015.11.26 15:01:00 - [2] - Quote Yes please, I played a 5v13 on which I was part of the five, and a 16v3 in which I was on the 16. Both yesterday. This needs to be fixed immediately. Changing NPE, one blueberry at a time. Join Fire and Gold Academy today!
postapo wastelander Corrosive Synergy 2	Posted - 2015.11.26 15:11:00 - [3] - Quote Professor Mehaffey wrote: Yes please, I played a 5v13 on which I was part of the five, and a 16v3 in which I was on the 16. Both yesterday. This needs to be fixed immediately. I played 1vs5 and they sent me message how they respect me :p Awesome feeling *"Mushroom hunter and Fish devourer."*
Summa Militum Abstract Requiem 1	Posted - 2015.11.26 18:40:00 - [4] - Quote YUUKI TERUMI wrote: Pretty easy. Eberybody complaining about matchmaking. In every single pub only a 4men/8men squad is allowed. No blueberries. Usually a match is unbalanced because there are 2+ squads on one side and barely one squad on the other team. If we only have one squad on each side and no blueberries... it should be ok and people cant blame their team if they lose. Also, please allow us to leave and rejoin a battle so we dont have to leave because of lag So solo players don't get to play Pubs?
Alena Asakura Caldari Logistics Reserve 151	Posted - 2015.11.27 11:18:00 - [5] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: YUUKI TERUMI wrote: Pretty easy. Eberybody complaining about matchmaking. In every single pub only a 4men/8men squad is allowed. No blueberries. Usually a match is unbalanced because there are 2+ squads on one side and barely one squad on the other team. If we only have one squad on each side and no blueberries... it should be ok and people cant blame their team if they lose. Also, please allow us to leave and rejoin a battle so we dont have to leave because of lag So solo players don't get to play Pubs? Yep that's what I thought. He's basicly saying solos doing get to play... At all... I really don't think this idea is very good. And it appears to come from one of the people in the game that think noobs and/or solos shouldn't be allowed. So how do we keep up replacements for players that leave without having noobs? Or maybe they don't even care, they just want to keep it between themselves! :)
Mortishai Belmont G.L.O.R.Y 1	Posted - 2015.11.27 11:31:00 - [6] - Quote They need to make a lobby that shows games in progress that you can join. Once a lobby reaches minimum requirements the match starts, everyone can go ahead and leave if they are too scared of who is on the other side. Also, they need a mid-game buffer to help with lag, once either MCC or clone count reaches 50% it should halt the game and refresh everything. The C.E.O. of G.L.O.R.Y, (~..)~ Now on Youtube ~(..~)
jordy mack WarRavens Imperium Eden 927	Posted - 2015.11.27 13:19:00 - [7] - Quote this isnt such a bad idea... maybe with some tweaking. like solo players get automatically put in a squad? i'm just thinking out loud here but what if... ambush = 1 squad per team aquisition = 1 squad per team domination = 1 or 2 squads per team skirmish = up to 4 squads per team so now u could que for any type of battle with any type of fireteam/squad/platoon. also we could have smaller matches, 4v4, 8v8, i wouldnt mind. Less QQ more PewPew
YUUKI TERUMI Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire 167	Posted - 2015.11.28 15:34:00 - [8] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: YUUKI TERUMI wrote: Pretty easy. Eberybody complaining about matchmaking. In every single pub only a 4men/8men squad is allowed. No blueberries. Usually a match is unbalanced because there are 2+ squads on one side and barely one squad on the other team. If we only have one squad on each side and no blueberries... it should be ok and people cant blame their team if they lose. Also, please allow us to leave and rejoin a battle so we dont have to leave because of lag So solo players don't get to play Pubs? I dont see why you should play alone when u can play with a squad Gal assault rof buff \0/ PortDust514
postapo wastelander Corrosive Synergy 2	Posted - 2015.11.28 15:37:00 - [9] - Quote jordy mack wrote: this isnt such a bad idea... maybe with some tweaking. like solo players get automatically put in a squad? i'm just thinking out loud here but what if... ambush = 1 squad per team aquisition = 1 squad per team domination = 1 or 2 squads per team skirmish = up to 4 squads per team so now u could que for any type of battle with any type of fireteam/squad/platoon. also we could have smaller matches, 4v4, 8v8, i wouldnt mind. This idea was here before ;) *"Who is postapo?!"*
Foo Fighting Blank Application 589	Posted - 2015.11.28 15:42:00 - [10] - Quote YUUKI TERUMI wrote: Summa Militum wrote: YUUKI TERUMI wrote: Pretty easy. Eberybody complaining about matchmaking. In every single pub only a 4men/8men squad is allowed. No blueberries. Usually a match is unbalanced because there are 2+ squads on one side and barely one squad on the other team. If we only have one squad on each side and no blueberries... it should be ok and people cant blame their team if they lose. Also, please allow us to leave and rejoin a battle so we dont have to leave because of lag So solo players don't get to play Pubs? I dont see why you should play alone when u can play with a squad I don't see why people, who don't see why people should play alone, should make such selfish suggestions.

postapo wastelander Corrosive Synergy 2	Posted - 2015.11.28 15:53:00 - [11] - Quote Issue is not puting people in squads or not. Issue is matchmaking globaly. Honestly sometime i like "lonely wulfing" too. I see the possible way in implementation of these: Technology/arms filter combined with Meta level filter combined with +/- WP count filter combined with Latency filter *"Who is postapo?!"*
YUUKI TERUMI Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire 167	Posted - 2015.11.28 17:20:00 - [12] - Quote Foo Fighting wrote: YUUKI TERUMI wrote: Summa Militum wrote: YUUKI TERUMI wrote: Pretty easy. Eberybody complaining about matchmaking. In every single pub only a 4men/8men squad is allowed. No blueberries. Usually a match is unbalanced because there are 2+ squads on one side and barely one squad on the other team. If we only have one squad on each side and no blueberries... it should be ok and people cant blame their team if they lose. Also, please allow us to leave and rejoin a battle so we dont have to leave because of lag So solo players don't get to play Pubs? I dont see why you should play alone when u can play with a squad I don't see why people, who don't see why people should play alone, should make such selfish suggestions. Because the game needs to be fixed Gal assault rof buff \0/ PortDust514
Summa Militum Abstract Requiem 1	Posted - 2015.11.28 19:36:00 - [13] - Quote YUUKI TERUMI wrote: Summa Militum wrote: YUUKI TERUMI wrote: Pretty easy. Eberybody complaining about matchmaking. In every single pub only a 4men/8men squad is allowed. No blueberries. Usually a match is unbalanced because there are 2+ squads on one side and barely one squad on the other team. If we only have one squad on each side and no blueberries... it should be ok and people cant blame their team if they lose. Also, please allow us to leave and rejoin a battle so we dont have to leave because of lag So solo players don't get to play Pubs? I dont see why you should play alone when u can play with a squad 1. Playing this video game by myself is a guaranteed way for me to enjoy my own little "me" time. Just about every single day I have to deal with random and non-random people trying to talk to me and awkwardly staring at me wherever I go. This game is my opportunity to escape away from all of those people. Now don't get me wrong. I will squad up here and there but pretty much only for Factional Warfare; I'm in a FW squad right now waiting for a match to start. 2. Most of the time I am very inconsistent with joining the queue for a match. For example, yesterday afternoon I was logged into Dust for 6 hours before turning off my PS3 to go to a friends house and in that 6 hours I played maybe 5 matches. 3. Sometimes it takes a long *** time just to get into a squad and I don't feel like dealing with that. 4. Reasons.
Summa Militum Abstract Requiem 1	Posted - 2015.11.28 19:39:00 - [14] - Quote jordy mack wrote: this isnt such a bad idea... maybe with some tweaking. like solo players get automatically put in a squad? i'm just thinking out loud here but what if... ambush = 1 squad per team aquisition = 1 squad per team domination = 1 or 2 squads per team skirmish = up to 4 squads per team so now u could que for any type of battle with any type of fireteam/squad/platoon. also we could have smaller matches, 4v4, 8v8, i wouldnt mind. I would like Skirmish to be up to 3 squads per team that way there is room in every match for solo players to join in; I don't want to get shut out of Skirmish matches.
YUUKI TERUMI Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire 167	Posted - 2015.11.28 19:45:00 - [15] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: YUUKI TERUMI wrote: Summa Militum wrote: YUUKI TERUMI wrote: Pretty easy. Eberybody complaining about matchmaking. In every single pub only a 4men/8men squad is allowed. No blueberries. Usually a match is unbalanced because there are 2+ squads on one side and barely one squad on the other team. If we only have one squad on each side and no blueberries... it should be ok and people cant blame their team if they lose. Also, please allow us to leave and rejoin a battle so we dont have to leave because of lag So solo players don't get to play Pubs? I dont see why you should play alone when u can play with a squad 1. Playing this video game by myself is a guaranteed way for me to enjoy my own little "me" time. Just about every single day I have to deal with random and non-random people trying to talk to me and awkwardly staring at me wherever I go. This game is my opportunity to escape away from all of those people. Now don't get me wrong. I will squad up here and there but pretty much only for Factional Warfare; I'm in a FW squad right now waiting for a match to start. 2. Most of the time I am very inconsistent with joining the queue for a match. For example, yesterday afternoon I was logged into Dust for 6 hours before turning off my PS3 to go to a friends house and in that 6 hours I played maybe 5 matches. 3. Sometimes it takes a long *** time just to get into a squad and I don't feel like dealing with that. 4. Reasons. Mmmh what about a squad+3 blueberries? Gal assault rof buff \0/ PortDust514
Alena Asakura Caldari Logistics Reserve 155	Posted - 2015.11.28 19:49:00 - [16] - Quote YUUKI TERUMI wrote: Summa Militum wrote: YUUKI TERUMI wrote: Pretty easy. Eberybody complaining about matchmaking. In every single pub only a 4men/8men squad is allowed. No blueberries. Usually a match is unbalanced because there are 2+ squads on one side and barely one squad on the other team. If we only have one squad on each side and no blueberries... it should be ok and people cant blame their team if they lose. Also, please allow us to leave and rejoin a battle so we dont have to leave because of lag So solo players don't get to play Pubs? I dont see why you should play alone when u can play with a squad Not everyone can or wants to play with a squad.
jordy mack WarRavens Imperium Eden 931	Posted - 2015.11.28 21:56:00 - [17] - Quote Summa Militum wrote: jordy mack wrote: this isnt such a bad idea... maybe with some tweaking. like solo players get automatically put in a squad? i'm just thinking out loud here but what if... ambush = 1 squad per team aquisition = 1 squad per team domination = 1 or 2 squads per team skirmish = up to 4 squads per team so now u could que for any type of battle with any type of fireteam/squad/platoon. also we could have smaller matches, 4v4, 8v8, i wouldnt mind. I would like Skirmish to be up to 3 squads per team that way there is room in every match for solo players to join in; I don't want to get shut out of Skirmish matches. you wouldnt get shut out. you would just get added to a squad that wasnt full. Less QQ more PewPew


Pages: 1 :: [one page]

PortDust514

PortDust514

PortDust514

PortDust514