| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Nothing Certain
Bioshock Rejects
1
   |
Posted - 2015.10.03 02:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
I doubt if it can be implemented in Dust, but every team based game suffers from the same problem Dust does, stomping. When you have a long running game you will always have uneven games, matchmaking hasn't solved this problem in any game I have seen but I think having three teams in a match, instead of two, would remedy most of the problem. The strongest teams would always be vulnerable to the other two teams ganging up on them. The danger of two good teams totally obliterating the lesser team is diminished because they both know they will then have to fight each other with no help. I've never seen this in a shooter and I don't see why there wiuld be any technical difficulty in implementing it.
Because, that's why.
|
Mikel Arias
Challengers 506
208
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 18:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
I like the idea, it would be a complete battlefield, however, I dont think this would ever be donde because there are not resources, and maybe the simply are not interested in doing this. Even so, +1. |
Hector Carson
DEPT OF CORRUPTION
The Empire of New Eden
281
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 19:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
Nothing Certain wrote:I doubt if it can be implemented in Dust, but every team based game suffers from the same problem Dust does, stomping. When you have a long running game you will always have uneven games, matchmaking hasn't solved this problem in any game I have seen but I think having three teams in a match, instead of two, would remedy most of the problem. The strongest teams would always be vulnerable to the other two teams ganging up on them. The danger of two good teams totally obliterating the lesser team is diminished because they both know they will then have to fight each other with no help. I've never seen this in a shooter and I don't see why there wiuld be any technical difficulty in implementing it.
why not 8vs8? It will be a hell of a lot easier on scotty and possibly fix a lot of the lag issues in the game.
Logistics mk.0
Commando mk.0
|
Starlight Burner
Black Screen
Adaptation.
530
|
Posted - 2015.10.04 07:18:00 -
[4] - Quote
I can agree with this.
I mean, I like the 3 team mode on Black Ops 2.
x Starlight Burner
CEO of Arrary of Clusters, a close relations corporation
Caldari Factional Warfare, enlist today!
Thank you for DUST
|
Lost Apollo
Moose Knuckle Pros
108
|
Posted - 2015.10.04 19:02:00 -
[5] - Quote
Screw the 3 way. Make FW a fatal 4 way!!!!
My armor is weak, but my shields are relentless.
State "Kampo" Logistics
Born - April 1, 2013
|
Gabriel Ceja
OSG Planetary Operations
114
|
Posted - 2015.10.05 05:55:00 -
[6] - Quote
MAG had a 3 way game mode and it was awesome.
Valor all the way! =ƒÆ¬
"Throw on the flux capacitor."
activates fuel injector
"WOOOOOO!!!"
|
Piercing Serenity
Immortal Guides
Learning Alliance
1
|
Posted - 2015.10.05 06:03:00 -
[7] - Quote
I would volunteer this idea for the tweak to Domination to make it a unique game mode. Three teams of 12 (to respect the current PS3 constraints) all fighting for the same point. Camping would be really difficult with two teams against you, but there should always be some conflict.
"For people who don't really do S**T, ya'll really doing the most"
Lv. 1 Forum Warrior
|
Ardos 130297
Prima Gallicus
46
|
Posted - 2015.10.05 09:24:00 -
[8] - Quote
Gabriel Ceja wrote:MAG had a 3 way game mode and it was awesome.
Valor all the way! =ƒÆ¬
Raven power !! =ƒÆ¬
And I very like this idea ^-^
You do not win a war by making what is just...
You win it by making what is necessary...
Veteran Closed Beta
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |