| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
HOLY PERFECTION
FINAL TRIBULATION
133
   |
Posted - 2015.09.30 15:23:00 -
[1] - Quote
I love what CCP had done with the majority of things they had updated. EXPECIALLY THE SWARMS. It gives dropships a chance to do their job, and swarms hopefully now are deterrents rather than a killing machine.
My only problem I see now is infantry's weapon being pretty powerful. One thing, is their any spot on a tank that's not a weak spot. Why not make the only weak spots where they make since. Like this:
Backside ( Battery Pack ) - 170 %
Underneath - 150 %
Fuel Cell located in back - 190 %
But CCP took it so far even the body does more than 100%. That's not a weak point, that's not right in my opinion. Nerf one AV buff All other 
ILL SEE HOW THIS TURNS OUT FOR TANKERS CCP RESPOND ON YOUR OPINION ABOUT THIS POST. GOOD LUCK VEHICLE DRIVERS.
If I charge, follow me. If I retreat, kill me. If I die, revenge me.
I'm really hard headed
|
Asad Thahab-Jabal
Incorruptibles
247
|
Posted - 2015.09.30 15:25:00 -
[2] - Quote
HOLY PERFECTION wrote:swarms hopefully now are deterrents rather than a killing machine. Why should a weapon exist if it is essentially the vehicle equivalent of bear mace and not actually a threat?
Ripley Riley is on safari until Oct 9th. I will represent him until he returns.
|
HOLY PERFECTION
FINAL TRIBULATION
133
|
Posted - 2015.09.30 15:29:00 -
[3] - Quote
Asad Thahab-Jabal wrote:HOLY PERFECTION wrote:swarms hopefully now are deterrents rather than a killing machine. Why should a weapon exist if it is essentially the vehicle equivalent of bear mace and not actually a threat?
Well it can kill, but not as fast as others exactly. A swarmer can kill a dropship in two volleys, a tank not so much. But when in pro tier, or officer it can kill in 3 - 4 volleys if not a pro tanker.
They were meant to deture tankers. Now if the tanker is dumb he will stay to die. I regroup and kill the AV *****. 
If I charge, follow me. If I retreat, kill me. If I die, revenge me.
I'm really hard headed
|
Megaman Trigger
OSG Planetary Operations
803
|
Posted - 2015.09.30 15:30:00 -
[4] - Quote
Weapons listed as doing more than 100% damage to the hull are also including their damage profile.
Purifier. First Class.
|
HOLY PERFECTION
FINAL TRIBULATION
133
|
Posted - 2015.09.30 15:30:00 -
[5] - Quote
Megaman Trigger wrote:Weapons listed as doing more than 100% damage to the hull are also including their damage profile.
ohh.. were all dead  
If I charge, follow me. If I retreat, kill me. If I die, revenge me.
I'm really hard headed
|
501st Headstrong
Inner.Hell
2
|
Posted - 2015.09.30 15:37:00 -
[6] - Quote
...Hotfix hasn't dropped yet... |
HOLY PERFECTION
FINAL TRIBULATION
133
|
Posted - 2015.09.30 15:39:00 -
[7] - Quote
501st Headstrong wrote:...Hotfix hasn't dropped yet...
I know it sais recent hotfix COMING
If I charge, follow me. If I retreat, kill me. If I die, revenge me.
I'm really hard headed
|
Baal Omniscient
Qualified Scrub
2
|
Posted - 2015.09.30 16:01:00 -
[8] - Quote
HOLY PERFECTION wrote:Asad Thahab-Jabal wrote:HOLY PERFECTION wrote:swarms hopefully now are deterrents rather than a killing machine. Why should a weapon exist if it is essentially the vehicle equivalent of bear mace and not actually a threat? Well it can kill, but not as fast as others exactly. A swarmer can kill a dropship in two volleys, a tank not so much. But when in pro tier, or officer it can kill in 3 - 4 volleys if not a pro tanker. They were meant to deture tankers. Now if the tanker is dumb he will stay to die. I regroup and kill the AV *****.
Please, do show us where CCP has said that swarms 'were meant to deter tankers' and not kill them. Show us where this was explained to be the purpose of swarms by someone from CCP and not some tank scrub complaining about swarms.
There is no such thing as a weapon on a battlefield that is only meant to scare enemies away, there are only weapons that do what weapons are made to do - kill the enemy. AV is made to kill vehicles, not scare them away so they can terrorize someone else somewhere else. No one wants a weapon that is just supposed to scare vehicles away but is more or less useless for killing a tank. And no one player should be able to solo multiple other players without being able to be solo'd themselves by someone using weapons made to fight that kind of loadout. It's as simple as that.
Winmatar Assault, Proficiency 5 SMG's & Proficiency 5 Swarms Since Uprising 1.0
I GÖú Puppies
(Gê¬n+Ç-´)GèâGöüGÿån+ƒ.*pâ+n+ín+ƒ.
|
Jonny D Buelle
The Warlords Legion
No Context
2
|
Posted - 2015.09.30 16:02:00 -
[9] - Quote
HOLY PERFECTION wrote:501st Headstrong wrote:...Hotfix hasn't dropped yet... I know it sais recent hotfix COMING
Which is a redundant statement. Recent is an adjective that describes the subject in last known past tense. Coming is a verb that describes the subject in the future tense that will arrive.
What you should of said: "In the Coming Hotfix." or "Hotfix Foxfour".
Your title is confusing.
Director of T-W-L
Keeper of the List
Lord of Scrubs
|
HOLY PERFECTION
FINAL TRIBULATION
133
|
Posted - 2015.09.30 16:04:00 -
[10] - Quote
Jonny D Buelle wrote:HOLY PERFECTION wrote:501st Headstrong wrote:...Hotfix hasn't dropped yet... I know it sais recent hotfix COMING Which is a redundant statement. Recent is an adjective that describes the subject in last known past tense. Coming is a verb that describes the subject in the future tense that will arrive. What you should of said: "In the Coming Hotfix." or "Hotfix Foxfour". Your title is confusing.
You thinking into it way to much. Ill change it if your want, its kind of retarted I'm talking about my title other than the actual topic.
If I charge, follow me. If I retreat, kill me. If I die, revenge me.
I'm really hard headed
|
|
|
Jonny D Buelle
The Warlords Legion
No Context
2
|
Posted - 2015.09.30 16:07:00 -
[11] - Quote
HOLY PERFECTION wrote:Jonny D Buelle wrote:HOLY PERFECTION wrote:501st Headstrong wrote:...Hotfix hasn't dropped yet... I know it sais recent hotfix COMING Which is a redundant statement. Recent is an adjective that describes the subject in last known past tense. Coming is a verb that describes the subject in the future tense that will arrive. What you should of said: "In the Coming Hotfix." or "Hotfix Foxfour". Your title is confusing. You thinking into it way to much. Ill change it if your want, its kind of retarted I'm talking about my title other than the actual topic.
Well to be honest the answer you are looking for has already been posted here. So I decided it better to correct your grammar and ****.
Also its 5am, I have been up all night, I nitpick when I am like this.
Director of T-W-L
Keeper of the List
Lord of Scrubs
|
HOLY PERFECTION
FINAL TRIBULATION
133
|
Posted - 2015.09.30 16:11:00 -
[12] - Quote
Jonny D Buelle wrote:HOLY PERFECTION wrote:Jonny D Buelle wrote:HOLY PERFECTION wrote:501st Headstrong wrote:...Hotfix hasn't dropped yet... I know it sais recent hotfix COMING Which is a redundant statement. Recent is an adjective that describes the subject in last known past tense. Coming is a verb that describes the subject in the future tense that will arrive. What you should of said: "In the Coming Hotfix." or "Hotfix Foxfour". Your title is confusing. You thinking into it way to much. Ill change it if your want, its kind of retarted I'm talking about my title other than the actual topic. Well to be honest the answer you are looking for has already been posted here. So I decided it better to correct your grammar and ****. Also its 5am, I have been up all night, I nitpick when I am like this.
The garmmar was fnie you sohlud go to bed snooer.
If I charge, follow me. If I retreat, kill me. If I die, revenge me.
I'm really hard headed
|
Jonny D Buelle
The Warlords Legion
No Context
2
|
Posted - 2015.09.30 16:17:00 -
[13] - Quote
HOLY PERFECTION wrote:
The garmmar was fnie you sohlud go to bed snooer.
Can't, it's a night shift with about three hours left. When I say I have been up all night, I have literally been awake all night.
Also, I do believe your spelling has either gotten worse, or I am starting to hallucinate.
Director of T-W-L
Keeper of the List
Lord of Scrubs
|
HOLY PERFECTION
FINAL TRIBULATION
133
|
Posted - 2015.09.30 16:20:00 -
[14] - Quote
Jonny D Buelle wrote:HOLY PERFECTION wrote:
The garmmar was fnie you sohlud go to bed snooer.
Can't, it's a night shift with about three hours left. When I say I have been up all night, I have literally been awake all night. Also, I do believe your spelling has either gotten worse, or I am starting to hallucinate.
its not wrose, yuor barin mmeoirzes in a pttaren, not sepcfiic ltteres. Pertty cool huh.
If I charge, follow me. If I retreat, kill me. If I die, revenge me.
I'm really hard headed
|
Jonny D Buelle
The Warlords Legion
No Context
2
|
Posted - 2015.09.30 16:38:00 -
[15] - Quote
HOLY PERFECTION wrote:Jonny D Buelle wrote:HOLY PERFECTION wrote:
The garmmar was fnie you sohlud go to bed snooer.
Can't, it's a night shift with about three hours left. When I say I have been up all night, I have literally been awake all night. Also, I do believe your spelling has either gotten worse, or I am starting to hallucinate. its not wrose, yuor barin mmeoirzes in a pttaren, not sepcfiic ltteres. Pertty cool huh.
Not really, it messes with my sleep deprived brain too much.
Director of T-W-L
Keeper of the List
Lord of Scrubs
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |