| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
![[Veteran_Adamantium Claws]](https://forums.dust514.com/themes/ccpDust514/dust-avatar-128.png "[Veteran_Adamantium Claws]")
[Veteran_Adamantium Claws]
0
   |
Posted - 2012.06.16 02:27:00 -
[1] - Quote
if you think otherwise go play a game called World of Tanks 
|
[Veteran_Baal Roo]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 02:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
why? |
[Veteran_Soven Taliesyn]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 02:37:00 -
[3] - Quote
Need a dislike button |
[Veteran_Delta-121]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 02:57:00 -
[4] - Quote
no limit is needed. |
[Veteran_Noah Om]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 03:01:00 -
[5] - Quote
Not a good idea really imo. You do realize people still have to pay for those right? And you do have the ability to destroy them... |
[Veteran_Zwierz Test]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 03:07:00 -
[6] - Quote
The manual post that Vehicles is not prebuilded, it's manufactured from BPC, so maybe the solution for "limit the tank" issue will be the queue for request, and manufacturing slots, with some prebuilded before battle - not limit itself. |
[Veteran_Ignatius Crumwald]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 03:08:00 -
[7] - Quote
 |
[Veteran_Duster Boskonovitch]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 03:56:00 -
[8] - Quote
i dont mind tanks as a matter of fact i love tanks in my team or the enemy , makes the gameplay more interesting |
[Veteran_Mavado V Noriega]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 04:01:00 -
[9] - Quote
lol @ OP |
[Veteran_Drake Lyons]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 04:15:00 -
[10] - Quote
I have to disagree. I know that being on foot against multiple tanks on the current maps can be overwhelming, especially when your team puts no real effort into killing them effectively. I also know, however, that two tanks can be taken out in about 30 seconds by an effective counter; including a skilled tank pilot or a couple of units with forge guns/swarm launchers.
The answer isn't fewer tanks, it's better teamwork.
That being said, I do think that using tanks and other vehicles should be a little more of a speciality. |
|
|
[Veteran_Darius Ashran]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 04:23:00 -
[11] - Quote
MY TANKS! YOU CAN NOT HAVE THEM! |
[Veteran_jenza aranda]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 04:35:00 -
[12] - Quote
Most uncoordinated tank drivers will be a bit overconfident, especially the T2 ones and will sometimes rush up into heavy enemy territory with little to know support. i found i can take down a sargaris with 5 shots of a forge gun. its not hard if you know what you are doing |
[Veteran_RPGio]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 04:55:00 -
[13] - Quote
Disagree with OP. Makes no sense at all. Moving on... |
[Veteran_Nova Knife]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 05:58:00 -
[14] - Quote
Other team is spamming tanks? Spam your own. There's nothing saying only one team can have tanks. |
[Veteran_Sorry Accident]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 06:02:00 -
[15] - Quote
Nova Knife wrote:Other team is spamming tanks? Spam your own. There's nothing saying only one team can have tanks.
Truth.
That, or quit running in front of the tank, shooting it with your small arms. Forge gun/Swarm launchers work fine for demolishing tanks.
And drop ships. Nova Knife  |
[Veteran_Vetis Rex]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 09:19:00 -
[16] - Quote
Seriously 1 tank pur side? Troll??
Bad bad idea. If a side spans tanks, then the opposing force should field spam forge guns, tanks or swarms. Maybe an over all vehicle limit like 50% of teams force. But 1? |
[Veteran_Nahlvat]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 09:29:00 -
[17] - Quote
My team today had the infinite number of tanks, we were all trying to get to A and the entire team had Swarm launchers and Forge guns propped on top of the Ridge lines and everywhere else....suffice to say these high end Marauders were not making it threw.
Tanks are rare sight at times because of the SP and ISK intensive cost of them. They may seem strong but they go down very easily when someone has a anti tank weapon.
People are going to have to start carrying forge guns,swarm launchers and a secondary weapon with them at all times if they want to take them on.
|
[Veteran_Templar Two]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 10:25:00 -
[18] - Quote
Adamantium Claws wrote:if you think otherwise go play a game called World of Tanks
I understand that seeing so many tanks can be "frighting", or even boring, and that sometimes Dust 514 might feel like a all vehicles game but I would like to reassure you that variety is going to happen.
Don't worry things are getting better 
|
[Veteran_JysN Quasai]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 10:37:00 -
[19] - Quote
Why do you want a Balance? When a one team is way better than the other then why shouldn't they overroll them with tanks? Or do you think eve Battles are unbalaced because the arn't the same amount of ships on both sides. Yes its Unfair. That's new eden deal with it. |
[Veteran_Templar Two]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 11:08:00 -
[20] - Quote
^^^
A 24 vs 3 match in FPS is simply unfair.
In EVE space ins't a concern but in FPS numbers makes the difference: 7 mercs vs 24 will have hard times to control the territory no matter how you put it...not to mention that TDM is simply a carnage with unbalanced teams.
Also in Eve you can flee a battle: here fleeing = quitting.
What works in EVE doesn't necessarily work in Dust 514.
That said vehicle limitation is not necessary but balance is. |
|
|
[Veteran_Danfen Stark]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 11:38:00 -
[21] - Quote
Templar Two wrote:^^^
A 24 vs 3 match in FPS is simply unfair.
In EVE space ins't a concern but in FPS numbers makes the difference: 7 mercs vs 24 will have hard times to control the territory no matter how you put it...not to mention that TDM is simply a carnage with unbalanced teams.
Also in Eve you can flee a battle: here fleeing = quitting.
What works in EVE doesn't necessarily work in Dust 514.
That said vehicle limitation is not necessary but balance is.
In highsec/battle moons, sure.
When it comes to low sec/0.0/corp battles though, you make do with what you can. You can't limit an opposing team simply on the fact that they an field more people than you. Rather, it is down to you whether or not you hire people to help, recruit more people or throw in the towel (or possibly even fight. You never know, you may win  ).
The arguement works both ways. Why should an alliance, who has worked hard and put a lot of money in to obtaining its assets, be limited in its numbers simple because the attackers/defenders can not bring their own numbers to bare?
On the OP, no. No vehicle limits please. If you have worked to gain the SP to train, and the ISK to buy the vehicles, why should you be limited on what you can have simply due to what another member of your team has? |
[Veteran_Templar Two]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 12:35:00 -
[22] - Quote
^^^
Well, low/null sec is another story: that is player's choice vs player's choice.
Still even then there could be limitations in place: a big corp might not be able to wage war on small corp and make direct confrontation inevitable, some balance/basic condition might be required even in low/null sec simply because the FPS mechanics are different than the ones in EVE.
Anyway the number of players per battle will be limited in Dust: I doubt CCP will be able to achieve the scope of EVE 2500 Vs 2500 battles...at least in the next 5-6 years. |
[Veteran_SuperMido]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 13:43:00 -
[23] - Quote
Just for the heck of it, if I ever get on a team against Adamantium Claws, I'll call in tanks for everyone on my team  ... |
[Veteran_Mensche Meysim]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 17:55:00 -
[24] - Quote
^ That's one thing that's a problem. If you don't have the skills to pilot a tank, you shouldn't be able to pilot a tank. |
[Veteran_Henri Thoreau]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 18:33:00 -
[25] - Quote
Adamantium Claws wrote:if you think otherwise go play a game called World of Tanks
Please limit the sandbox to one busket. kthxbai! |
[Veteran_Prophet ISF]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 18:55:00 -
[26] - Quote
Totally disagree. The army with the most tanks/vehicles will win the war. I'm sure if you have a team, you don't have to fight in official matches to get some ISK and save up for a couple of tanks.
More tanks, the merrier! |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |