| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Tyjus Vacca
Valor Coalition
333
   |
Posted - 2015.05.18 01:42:00 -
[1] - Quote
A damage modifier that specifically does more damage to hardened vehicles 15% at proto..... thoughts ?
sniper changes !!? O_o
|
LUGMOS
Corrosive Synergy
Rise Of Legion.
4042
|
Posted - 2015.05.18 01:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
Tyjus Vacca wrote:A damage modifier that specifically does more damage to hardened vehicles 15% at proto..... thoughts ?
Needs a downside.
Sniper Rifles are for Nitrogenous Dioxide Borons
First to PM me with common name wins
(no Hyansaru, u win too much ;P)
|
Tyjus Vacca
Valor Coalition
333
|
Posted - 2015.05.18 01:49:00 -
[3] - Quote
LUGMOS wrote:Tyjus Vacca wrote:A damage modifier that specifically does more damage to hardened vehicles 15% at proto..... thoughts ? Needs a downside.
does not affect unhardened vehicles or infantry
sniper changes !!? O_o
|
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui
Onikanabo Brigade
Caldari State
2085
|
Posted - 2015.05.18 02:28:00 -
[4] - Quote
I thought that was what team work was for .
Doubts are like bothersome flies and should be treated as such and crushed . #PubsShouldBeRandomPlayers
|
One Eyed King
Nos Nothi
10039
|
Posted - 2015.05.18 02:56:00 -
[5] - Quote
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote:I thought that was what team work was for .
Unless you are in a tank, and then you are allowed to be as OP as you want solo and its supposedly ok.
Former CEO of the Land of the BIind.
Any double entendre is unintended I assure you.
|
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui
Onikanabo Brigade
Caldari State
2086
|
Posted - 2015.05.18 03:03:00 -
[6] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote:Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote:I thought that was what team work was for . Unless you are in a tank, and then you are allowed to be as OP as you want solo and its supposedly ok.
Are you serious .?. will this be the beginning of the HAV nerf quest 2.0 .
Another witch hunt ?
This is the reason why we can't have nice things in Dust 514 .
BPO's are alright though ... no risk and all the reward .
Q-syncing skirmish matches are alright though , just stomp away in your changeable APEX with your well known and familiar teammates , while stomping random players ... bankrupt noobs and reap all the rewards while keeping your inventory intact .
That's alright though .
Nerf heavies , nerf the HMG and nerf HAV's .
Nice .
Edit : Anyone that knows anything about vehicles know that solo HAV's a lunch for a manned HAV and most have more then one occupant ... I wonder what's next on the nerf list for you folks .
Doubts are like bothersome flies and should be treated as such and crushed . #PubsShouldBeRandomPlayers
|
Cat Merc
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
16841
|
Posted - 2015.05.18 03:06:00 -
[7] - Quote
Taka?
Spkr?
"Breakin, PS3's and PS4's can't mate. They're incompatible. Unlike Apache's and Cappuccino machines." - Cat wisdom
|
Juno Tristan
Obscure Reference
609
|
Posted - 2015.05.18 04:14:00 -
[8] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote:Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote:I thought that was what team work was for . Unless you are in a tank, and then you are allowed to be as OP as you want solo and its supposedly ok.
Can't hack a point in a tank
Can't deploy a tank in ambush
Tanks require teamwork
ADS Ramming Revenge!
Plasma Cannon Rampage
|
Echo 1991
Dead Man's Game
820
|
Posted - 2015.05.18 05:19:00 -
[9] - Quote
Juno Tristan wrote:One Eyed King wrote:Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote:I thought that was what team work was for . Unless you are in a tank, and then you are allowed to be as OP as you want solo and its supposedly ok. Can't hack a point in a tank Can't deploy a tank in ambush Tanks require teamwork
That's not showing that a tank requires teamwork. I mean you can win a match by cloning a team. For a tank to excel at what it does, team teamwork is a large factor but otherwise tanks don't really need it. |
Operative 1174 Uuali
Y.A.M.A.H
714
|
Posted - 2015.05.18 05:46:00 -
[10] - Quote
Nah. Best to bring in ewar like nos and neuts to drain hardener power or target painter to increase damage to vehicle etc.
These should be vehicle to vehicle though, not AV. Adding ewar AV is just too damn much against tanks and an ewar based Cal tank is just too cool. I want one!
I'd love to see ewar large turrets.
The CPM candidate we need, not the one we want. The candidate for the rest of us.
|
|
|
Thumb Green
The Valyrian Mercenary Army
2361
|
Posted - 2015.05.18 06:08:00 -
[11] - Quote
Meh, kind of defeats the purpose of hardeners and the downside you gave in another comment is just asinine. It can fck up a hardened vehicles but does nothing to unhardened ones and infantry? What the hell kind of bizarro world is this? And that's if by "doesn't effect" you mean it cause your weapon to do no damage to them but if you just mean no bonus damage to them, well that's not really a downside.
Juno Tristan wrote:One Eyed King wrote:Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote:I thought that was what team work was for . Unless you are in a tank, and then you are allowed to be as OP as you want solo and its supposedly ok. Can't hack a point in a tank Can't deploy a tank in ambush Tanks require teamwork
As if the majority of tankers care about hacking the point. You get in a tank to shoot at things, not to hack.
Gee, I wonder why tanks aren't allowed in ambush anymore. In any case I'm sure it had nothing to do with tanks completely dominating them.
You must not know the definition of "require".
I got a lot of stuff you want and could just have if it weren't for the trade tax.
Rated [TV-MA]
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |