DUST Search - tanks in acquisition

All Channels

General Discussions

tanks in acquisition

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Panthrax Oblivion 53	Posted - 2015.05.09 14:41:00 - [1] - Quote We can't have no vehicles in ambush. That's fine, nothing wrong. But in acquisition, we can?!?! WITH NO TURRENTS TO HELP STOP THEM! I just played in an acquisition against three tanks. All they did was surround the point. Impossible to win! Either the tanks must go, or the turrents be added You all think you're so great, so I cant wait to put a bullet in your head and laugh at your dumb self
Void Echo Helix Order Learning Alliance 2812	Posted - 2015.05.09 14:41:00 - [2] - Quote You obviously don't know how to work as a team to kill tanks Closed Beta Vet. CEO: Helix Order. I have the controlled anger, more dangerous than you.
Panthrax Oblivion 53	Posted - 2015.05.09 14:45:00 - [3] - Quote Void Echo wrote: You obviously don't know how to work as a team to kill tanks You obviously don't know that when your not in a squad it's difficult to communicate with others and say 'let's all get our forge guns out. While we all are shooting at tanks, the opponent infantry can come and pick us apart one by one' You all think you're so great, so I cant wait to put a bullet in your head and laugh at your dumb self
Scheneighnay McBob And the ButtPirates 6484	Posted - 2015.05.09 14:45:00 - [4] - Quote Void Echo wrote: You obviously don't know how to work as a team to kill tanks *****, I don't need teamwork. I use a cloak, packed REs, and AV grenades. Keep the toxic ambush community in ambush Some details can be ignored
Harpyja 2391	Posted - 2015.05.09 14:46:00 - [5] - Quote In all honesty, I don't see this to be any different from a scenario where your team is all militia and standard and the enemy team is all advanced and proto. Of course you're going to lose. Either your team wasn't willing to switch to advanced/proto to even out the battleground, or blame matchmaking. In your scenario, it's either your team's fault for not calling in HAVs or matchmaking's fault. Matchmaking should at least consider people's SP and where it's invested. For example, if the majority of your SP is invested into vehicles, let's say more specifically HAV operation and large turrets, then you are more likely to be an experienced pilot and will call in a HAV to aid your team. "By His light, and His will"- The Scriptures, 12:32
Foo Fighting Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 295	Posted - 2015.05.09 14:46:00 - [6] - Quote Lai Dai. If everyone carried these dudes tanks would not be an issue.
Harpyja 2392	Posted - 2015.05.09 14:52:00 - [7] - Quote Foo Fighting wrote: Lai Dai. If everyone carried these dudes tanks would not be an issue. I'm not going to lie, I've been legitimately killed when several assaults start lobbing AV grenades at me all together. "By His light, and His will"- The Scriptures, 12:32
Breakin Stuff Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group 8483	Posted - 2015.05.09 14:54:00 - [8] - Quote As a dedicated AV gunner, and acknowledging the madrugar meta is broken, GET THE HELL OUT OF ACQUISITION AND GO BACK TO AMBUSH WHERE YOU ARE WELCOME. Leave the damn vehicle drivers alone. Torturing them is MY job and privilege, you can cry in your corner. There's never enough sh**posting going on, so let's add a few more teaspoons of the guy posting after me to the recipie!
Sicerly Yaw Quantum times 139	Posted - 2015.05.09 14:56:00 - [9] - Quote Panthrax Oblivion wrote: We can't have no vehicles in ambush. That's fine, nothing wrong. But in acquisition, we can?!?! WITH NO TURRENTS TO HELP STOP THEM! I just played in an acquisition against three tanks. All they did was surround the point. Impossible to win! Either the tanks must go, or the turrents be added there is such thing as av and you can pull out your own tanks as well tanks in ambush were a problem due to the low amount of clones one could sacrifice that is not the case in acquisition
Panthrax Oblivion 53	Posted - 2015.05.09 14:58:00 - [10] - Quote Sicerly Yaw wrote: Panthrax Oblivion wrote: We can't have no vehicles in ambush. That's fine, nothing wrong. But in acquisition, we can?!?! WITH NO TURRENTS TO HELP STOP THEM! I just played in an acquisition against three tanks. All they did was surround the point. Impossible to win! Either the tanks must go, or the turrents be added there is such thing as av and you can pull out your own tanks as well tanks in ambush were a problem due to the low amount of clones one could sacrifice that is not the case in acquisition My lone tank vs their three? Seems like I have a good chance to succeed You all think you're so great, so I cant wait to put a bullet in your head and laugh at your dumb self

Void Echo Helix Order Learning Alliance 2813	Posted - 2015.05.09 15:05:00 - [11] - Quote Panthrax Oblivion wrote: Void Echo wrote: You obviously don't know how to work as a team to kill tanks You obviously don't know that when your not in a squad it's difficult to communicate with others and say 'let's all get our forge guns out. While we all are shooting at tanks, the opponent infantry can come and pick us apart one by one' It's called squad finder and chat channels, use them. Closed Beta Vet. CEO: Helix Order. I have the controlled anger, more dangerous than you.
Panthrax Oblivion 53	Posted - 2015.05.09 15:09:00 - [12] - Quote Void Echo wrote: Panthrax Oblivion wrote: Void Echo wrote: You obviously don't know how to work as a team to kill tanks You obviously don't know that when your not in a squad it's difficult to communicate with others and say 'let's all get our forge guns out. While we all are shooting at tanks, the opponent infantry can come and pick us apart one by one' It's called squad finder and chat channels, use them. Ew strangers You all think you're so great, so I cant wait to put a bullet in your head and laugh at your dumb self
Scheneighnay McBob And the ButtPirates 6488	Posted - 2015.05.09 15:14:00 - [13] - Quote Panthrax Oblivion wrote: Sicerly Yaw wrote: Panthrax Oblivion wrote: We can't have no vehicles in ambush. That's fine, nothing wrong. But in acquisition, we can?!?! WITH NO TURRENTS TO HELP STOP THEM! I just played in an acquisition against three tanks. All they did was surround the point. Impossible to win! Either the tanks must go, or the turrents be added there is such thing as av and you can pull out your own tanks as well tanks in ambush were a problem due to the low amount of clones one could sacrifice that is not the case in acquisition My lone tank vs their three? Seems like I have a good chance to succeed They have 3 tanks? So is ANYONE on their team actually on the objective? 1v3 with HAVs isn't too bad if you know your ****. Just takes a looooot of patience. In the mean time, they'll probably all be worried about trying to kill you, and not actually supporting their team in any way Some details can be ignored
Operative 1174 Uuali Y.A.M.A.H 665	Posted - 2015.05.09 15:21:00 - [14] - Quote Finally, a game mode for vehicles! I say, no infantry in aquisition. Infantry is ruining this game as it is. Death is a serious businessGÇª So is running a shoddy, half-baked game company.
MarasdF Loron Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback 1114	Posted - 2015.05.09 15:25:00 - [15] - Quote Harpyja wrote: Foo Fighting wrote: Lai Dai. If everyone carried these dudes tanks would not be an issue. I'm not going to lie, I've been legitimately killed when several assaults start lobbing AV grenades at me all together. Well, there's absolutely nothing that can save you from 2-3 people with lai dais, except distance, lots of distance.
Breakin Stuff Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group 8487	Posted - 2015.05.09 15:25:00 - [16] - Quote Operative 1174 Uuali wrote: Finally, a game mode for vehicles! I say, no infantry in aquisition. Infantry is ruining this game as it is. For irony alone... CANNOT LIKE THIS POST ENOUGH!!! There's never enough sh**posting going on, so let's add a few more teaspoons of the guy posting after me to the recipie!
Foo Fighting Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 297	Posted - 2015.05.09 15:28:00 - [17] - Quote Breakin Stuff wrote: Operative 1174 Uuali wrote: Finally, a game mode for vehicles! I say, no infantry in aquisition. Infantry is ruining this game as it is. For irony alone... CANNOT LIKE THIS POST ENOUGH!!! It would be perpetual war.
Crimson ShieId Horizons' Edge No Context 2571	Posted - 2015.05.09 15:33:00 - [18] - Quote Foo Fighting wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Operative 1174 Uuali wrote: Finally, a game mode for vehicles! I say, no infantry in aquisition. Infantry is ruining this game as it is. For irony alone... CANNOT LIKE THIS POST ENOUGH!!! It would be perpetual war. Good luck hacking that point~ My Plasma Cannon says "Hello" to your face~
Henchmen21 Planet Express LLC 1294	Posted - 2015.05.09 16:16:00 - [19] - Quote The spawns should be looked at, some are just wide open with no cover, others have accessible building and roofs overlooking them. All the AV in the world won't help once the other team gets you down to the single unprotected spawns. Thankfully for my team I always carry lots and lots of uplinks. Acquisition is terrible, matchmaking is terrible, your game is still riddled with bugs, you should feel bad.
KEROSIINI-TERO The Rainbow Effect 2003	Posted - 2015.05.09 17:28:00 - [20] - Quote Hey! Don't blame the tanks for the faults of very bad map-spawn area design! It's a huge step back into early years of Dust to have a single campable homespawn with no cover. More of this fubar design here Looking at both sides of the coin. Even Aurum one.

Jonny D Buelle Mors Effera 1381	Posted - 2015.05.09 17:39:00 - [21] - Quote Panthrax Oblivion wrote: We can't have no vehicles in ambush. That's fine, nothing wrong. But in acquisition, we can?!?! WITH NO TURRENTS TO HELP STOP THEM! I just played in an acquisition against three tanks. All they did was surround the point. Impossible to win! Either the tanks must go, or the turrents be added I refuse to give you a serious response as the double negative in your first sentence confuses me. Today's special: PAIN Comes with a side of salads and mash potatoes.
Panthrax Oblivion 55	Posted - 2015.05.09 22:02:00 - [22] - Quote Jonny D Buelle wrote: Panthrax Oblivion wrote: We can't have no vehicles in ambush. That's fine, nothing wrong. But in acquisition, we can?!?! WITH NO TURRENTS TO HELP STOP THEM! I just played in an acquisition against three tanks. All they did was surround the point. Impossible to win! Either the tanks must go, or the turrents be added I refuse to give you a serious response as the double negative in your first sentence confuses me. I refuse to care as you fail to understand my usual and purposely double negatives You all think you're so great, so I cant wait to put a bullet in your head and laugh at your dumb self
Dreis ShadowWeaver 0uter.Heaven Back and Forth 3559	Posted - 2015.05.09 22:10:00 - [23] - Quote Void Echo wrote: You obviously don't know how to work as a team to kill tanks That's not the point. Why should vehicles not be allowed in Ambush - where there were installations to use against them - but vehicles are allowed in Acquisition - where there are no installations? Creator of the 'Nova Knifers United' channel My Minja Blog Day 23/30 exclusively Minja
el OPERATOR Capital Acquisitions LLC 1092	Posted - 2015.05.09 22:37:00 - [24] - Quote Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote: Void Echo wrote: You obviously don't know how to work as a team to kill tanks That's not the point. Why should vehicles not be allowed in Ambush - where there were installations to use against them - but vehicles are allowed in Acquisition - where there are no installations? iirc it was a mix of "OP" 1.6-7 vehicle spam vs infantry QQ due to the overwhelming ease of vehicles to essentially corral infantry "smart deploying" into same area repeatedly and the relatively low clone count overall someone else already mentioned. The mix was a nightmare of gaping proportions for noobs and anyone else without the SP or worthwhile AV investments to address it. Open-Beta Vet. Egbinger Original. DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR
Panthrax Oblivion 58	Posted - 2015.05.10 01:24:00 - [25] - Quote Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote: Void Echo wrote: You obviously don't know how to work as a team to kill tanks That's not the point. Why should vehicles not be allowed in Ambush - where there were installations to use against them - but vehicles are allowed in Acquisition - where there are no installations? Thank you! You all think you're so great, so I cant wait to put a bullet in your head and laugh at your dumb self
Breakin Stuff Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group 8535	Posted - 2015.05.10 01:27:00 - [26] - Quote Because you nerds already got your vehicle-free zone to play in. If you want to never have to worry about vehicles, go play there. There's never enough sh**posting going on, so let's add a few more teaspoons of the guy posting after me to the recipie!
thor424 Namtar Elite Gallente Federation 158	Posted - 2015.05.10 01:39:00 - [27] - Quote Carry nothing but sleek AV nades in Acq. You are welcome. If everyone does this you'll start seeing more dropships than tanks. Thor's Emporium
Void Echo Helix Order Learning Alliance 2816	Posted - 2015.05.10 02:31:00 - [28] - Quote Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote: Void Echo wrote: You obviously don't know how to work as a team to kill tanks That's not the point. Why should vehicles not be allowed in Ambush - where there were installations to use against them - but vehicles are allowed in Acquisition - where there are no installations? Infantry qqed about vehicles in ambush so they removed them, aquasition is a new game mode, they haven't worked out the tweaks yet, but don't worry, I'm sure they'll remove infant from there. Closed Beta Vet. CEO: Helix Order. I have the controlled anger, more dangerous than you.
Panthrax Oblivion 59	Posted - 2015.05.10 03:25:00 - [29] - Quote Void Echo wrote: Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote: Void Echo wrote: You obviously don't know how to work as a team to kill tanks That's not the point. Why should vehicles not be allowed in Ambush - where there were installations to use against them - but vehicles are allowed in Acquisition - where there are no installations? Infantry qqed about vehicles in ambush so they removed them, aquasition is a new game mode, they haven't worked out the tweaks yet, but don't worry, I'm sure they'll remove infant from there. Or at least add turrents You all think you're so great, so I cant wait to put a bullet in your head and laugh at your dumb self
SLENDER M4N Negative-Feedback. Negative-Feedback 325	Posted - 2015.05.10 03:32:00 - [30] - Quote I don't want to come off as rude, but it kind of bugs me that you call the Installations, "Turrents." But call them whatever you want. KainNoBueno I watch hentai for the plot

Panthrax Oblivion 59	Posted - 2015.05.10 03:51:00 - [31] - Quote SLENDER M4N wrote: I don't want to come off as rude, but it kind of bugs me that you call the Installations, "Turrents." But call them whatever you want. It's a habit I picked up from star wars battlefront You all think you're so great, so I cant wait to put a bullet in your head and laugh at your dumb self
Vesta Opalus Ostrakon Agency Gallente Federation 678	Posted - 2015.05.10 03:57:00 - [32] - Quote Panthrax Oblivion wrote: We can't have no vehicles in ambush. That's fine, nothing wrong. But in acquisition, we can?!?! WITH NO TURRENTS TO HELP STOP THEM! I just played in an acquisition against three tanks. All they did was surround the point. Impossible to win! Either the tanks must go, or the turrents be added Aquisition is the one game mode where I will voluntarily spawn in at the start as commando, if one or two more people do it, the tanks get wrecked SO HARD.
Vesta Opalus Ostrakon Agency Gallente Federation 678	Posted - 2015.05.10 03:57:00 - [33] - Quote Panthrax Oblivion wrote: SLENDER M4N wrote: I don't want to come off as rude, but it kind of bugs me that you call the Installations, "Turrents." But call them whatever you want. It's a habit I picked up from star wars battlefront It is actually "turrents" in SW battlefront, or is it "turrets"?
Vesta Opalus Ostrakon Agency Gallente Federation 678	Posted - 2015.05.10 03:59:00 - [34] - Quote Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote: Void Echo wrote: You obviously don't know how to work as a team to kill tanks That's not the point. Why should vehicles not be allowed in Ambush - where there were installations to use against them - but vehicles are allowed in Acquisition - where there are no installations? I think the major issue is that on ambush there is no redline to safely call down vehicles to counter the enemy vehicles, so it can turn into a very one sided affair. Correct me if Im wrong, but there is a redline in Acquisition, right?
Reign Omega T.H.I.R.D R.O.C.K 1493	Posted - 2015.05.10 04:03:00 - [35] - Quote Panthrax Oblivion wrote: We can't have no vehicles in ambush. That's fine, nothing wrong. But in acquisition, we can?!?! WITH NO TURRENTS TO HELP STOP THEM! I just played in an acquisition against three tanks. All they did was surround the point. Impossible to win! Either the tanks must go, or the turrents be added Wtf is a turrent? Mark a$$ tricks, and bags of dicks....
Panthrax Oblivion 59	Posted - 2015.05.10 04:06:00 - [36] - Quote Vesta Opalus wrote: Panthrax Oblivion wrote: SLENDER M4N wrote: I don't want to come off as rude, but it kind of bugs me that you call the Installations, "Turrents." But call them whatever you want. It's a habit I picked up from star wars battlefront It is actually "turrents" in SW battlefront, or is it "turrets"? Idk, it's just how my device spells it You all think you're so great, so I cant wait to put a bullet in your head and laugh at your dumb self
Vesta Opalus Ostrakon Agency Gallente Federation 678	Posted - 2015.05.10 04:10:00 - [37] - Quote Panthrax Oblivion wrote: Vesta Opalus wrote: Panthrax Oblivion wrote: SLENDER M4N wrote: I don't want to come off as rude, but it kind of bugs me that you call the Installations, "Turrents." But call them whatever you want. It's a habit I picked up from star wars battlefront It is actually "turrents" in SW battlefront, or is it "turrets"? Idk, it's just how my device spells it You should make it stop :d
Panthrax Oblivion 61	Posted - 2015.05.10 04:26:00 - [38] - Quote Vesta Opalus wrote: Panthrax Oblivion wrote: Vesta Opalus wrote: Panthrax Oblivion wrote: SLENDER M4N wrote: I don't want to come off as rude, but it kind of bugs me that you call the Installations, "Turrents." But call them whatever you want. It's a habit I picked up from star wars battlefront It is actually "turrents" in SW battlefront, or is it "turrets"? Idk, it's just how my device spells it You should make it stop :d Nahhhh You all think you're so great, so I cant wait to put a bullet in your head and laugh at your dumb self
Adicto One 1.U.P 69	Posted - 2015.05.10 22:11:00 - [39] - Quote Step 1 : call you Ck.0 centinel with 4 dmg complex mods, put in a Alldin's FG, proff lvl 5 recharge lvl 5. Step 2: Call a dropship and up in a tower or a high place. Step 3: Kill the tank with 3 shots or see how run the tank to redline. Its too easy. PD: the last week in a acquisition I seen DOC DDD in the battlefield, I killed him 3 times, too easy, He went 8/3 and my team won. AddictPunk -
LOL KILLZ LulKlz 78	Posted - 2015.05.10 22:12:00 - [40] - Quote I agree with ya buddy. Throw in the turrets or take out HAV CEO of LulKlz/ chat channel LulKlz, code 0000 <--- numbers

True Adamance Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 18891	Posted - 2015.05.10 22:14:00 - [41] - Quote * Sees players whining about tanks in the Acquisition game mode and..... EATS THEIR SOULS! Gobble Gobble Gobble (Gê¬n+Ç-´)GèâGöüGÿån+ƒ.pâ+n+ín+ƒ. LASERS BTCH!!!!!! The Incursions are back... and they're golden baby!
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui Onikanabo Brigade Caldari State 2068	Posted - 2015.05.10 22:52:00 - [42] - Quote Harpyja wrote: For example, if the majority of your SP is invested into vehicles, let's say more specifically HAV operation and large turrets, then you are more likely to be an experienced pilot and will call in a HAV to aid your team. This is just not true , as most know for those who are thirsty ... the forums dictate the movements in this game , anyone says , " This is OP ." and you see the mad rush to speck into that OP item and the way most complain about vehicles be they ADS's or HAV's even LAV's ... you will see the mad rush towards that item or role so you can have someone with a large amount of SP's that for instance , casually used HAV's and now are tired of infantry .. couple that with the blow up in the forum of , " HAV's are OP . " ... using this as an example and this same person specks into vehicles because they figure that role might be easier and can rack up tons of kills , not thinking about the support factor like most don't , they speck into vehicles .. now is this person experienced or are they looking for the next FOTM or OP item like most do .?. and this happens so often in this game it's like the changing of the seasons . So while I can agree that they might be experienced , more then likely their not and they suck at anything besides killing and they don't know how to handle AV or even know what to look for as far as hot spots and dangerous situations to avoid . You can use a respec and change your whole game if you choose , doesn't mean you actually know what your doing once you do that . Doubts are like bothersome flies and should be treated as such and crushed . #PubsShouldBeRandomPlayers


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.

KainNoBueno