| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
CommanderBolt
KILL-EM-QUICK
Rise Of Legion.
3407
   |
Posted - 2015.04.26 11:56:00 -
[1] - Quote
Would it be possible to have Officer LAV`s?
A more tanky version of what we already have but instead of a Small Turret slot, we attach Large Turrets to the back instead!? 
Come on you know you guys want an LAV with a large blaster! haha
Vitantur Nothus wrote: Why hide a solution under frothy pile of derpa?
SCV Ready!
|
Foundation Seldon
Demonite's Legion
960
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 14:22:00 -
[2] - Quote
So you want Destroyer HAVs. Speedy frame, more fragile than a typical tank, with a bonus to the power of turrets.
|
I-Shayz-I
I----------I
5413
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 15:30:00 -
[3] - Quote
I would rather have a makeshift APC.
-ridiculous amounts of HP and fitting space
-very slow
-built in mobile CRU
-built in active scanner
-resupplies players within x meters (optional)
-built in remote armor repairer (optional)
7162 wp with a Repair Tool!
|
Sgt Kirk
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
10398
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 15:32:00 -
[4] - Quote
Can we get actually LAVs and not these paper-thin death coffins we have now because Ratatti didn't give LAVs their slots back.
As long as 5/6 (83%) of infantry AV weapons are Anti Armor based you're never going to achieve vehicle balance CCP
|
Godin Thekiller
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
3133
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 16:22:00 -
[5] - Quote
Foundation Seldon wrote:So you want Destroyer HAVs. Speedy frame, more fragile than a typical tank, with a bonus to the power of turrets.
Destroyer HAV's are HAV's that were supposed to be designed for AAA work, but was decided that they were ******* stupid, and ditched. You mean Enforcer HAV's.
click me
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
Godin Thekiller
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
3133
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 16:24:00 -
[6] - Quote
This idea is just silly. It wouldn't even fit on the current models we have, and they would become a big ass weak target, unless they somehow got anywhere near HAV levels of tank while being able to move near LAV speeds without nitro, which would just make them silly OP. Just no.
click me
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
Godin Thekiller
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
3133
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 16:26:00 -
[7] - Quote
I-Shayz-I wrote:I would rather have a makeshift APC.
-ridiculous amounts of HP and fitting space
-very slow
-built in mobile CRU
-built in active scanner
-resupplies players within x meters (optional)
-built in remote armor repairer (optional)
I'd rather not make the thing have pretty much every utility hi slot module built into the LAV. Built modules needs to just go away; it was a silly idea to start with.
Also, That's nothing like what MAV's are supposed to be.
click me
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
CommanderBolt
KILL-EM-QUICK
Rise Of Legion.
3408
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 17:13:00 -
[8] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:This idea is just silly. It wouldn't even fit on the current models we have, and they would become a big ass weak target, unless they somehow got anywhere near HAV levels of tank while being able to move near LAV speeds without nitro, which would just make them silly OP. Just no.
... Party pooper
Vitantur Nothus wrote: Why hide a solution under frothy pile of derpa?
SCV Ready!
|
Godin Thekiller
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
3133
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 21:07:00 -
[9] - Quote
CommanderBolt wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:This idea is just silly. It wouldn't even fit on the current models we have, and they would become a big ass weak target, unless they somehow got anywhere near HAV levels of tank while being able to move near LAV speeds without nitro, which would just make them silly OP. Just no. ... Party pooper
Deal with it, silly **** is silly.
click me
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |