|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
18286
|
Posted - 2015.04.16 22:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:SLENDER M4N wrote:Joel II X wrote:Not as filthy as the Minmaturds. Heh. Fixed it Joel :) Come back to me when the Amarr hold a majority in any system Dust-side.
I like that you are being as specific as you are limiting your scope to Dust.....because we've owned the space for months now. However since Amarr dropped to T3 Minmatar are more active and more fights can be found.
Last I heard LNA was coming back sans one of their main corps....but who knows.
#MinmatarstillonlyfactiontoneverhaveconqueredallFWspace
GÇ£That is not dead which can eternal lie,
And with strange aeons even death may die.GÇ¥
-The Nameless City
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
18291
|
Posted - 2015.04.16 22:59:00 -
[2] - Quote
Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:LUGMOS wrote:Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:SLENDER M4N wrote:Joel II X wrote:Not as filthy as the Minmaturds. Heh. Fixed it Joel :) Come back to me when the Amarr hold a majority in any system Dust-side. Come back to me when Dust FW matters Last I checked, I'm playing DUST 514, not EVE: Online.
Yet only one of these two games FW means anything.
Dust 514 FW might have meaning when we have agency, when groups can specifically target planets and systems for their EVE militia, when pay outs are worth fighting for,when FW players can support themselves in FW, where even small groups of dedicated players can influence the warzone their efforts.
Hell even where player created narratives can run, if you watched Kirks vids you see he creates his own, players themselves would inevitably do this. Planetary Sieges of Arzad I, or the Dropsite Massacre of Frestrom III, Civil Uprising on Ammamake XI.
GÇ£That is not dead which can eternal lie,
And with strange aeons even death may die.GÇ¥
-The Nameless City
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
18291
|
Posted - 2015.04.16 23:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:True Adamance wrote:Yet only one of these two games FW means anything. I mean you know I'm a huge FW fan in Dust.....but you have no agency, you do not capture districts meaningfully, you do not aid meaningfully in the control of systems barring the occasional and unlikely instance that a specific system (that we cannot even choose to enter) happens to see Dust FW change while a Hub is being bashed.....and even that hinders players for and hour or so tops, do do not have locality, you aren't even rewarded well for doing it.
Cool. But since I don't play EVE: Online, and can't significantly influence EVE: Online's space sovereignty, it's pointless bringing it up. I can only focus on the game I play.
Which is a part of and derived from EVE's FW mode. Currently the significance of Dust is limited to what kind of VP buffer you are offering your MLT.
There shouldn't be this ideal that these are two separate modes as they are one in the same.
If Dust did allow us this agency I could care less about the Minmatar owning 90% of the region if only my efforts in X system allowed us to have system bonuses in our favour at a given time. That would make Dust FW have significant impact and us worth considering to EVE pilots.
GÇ£That is not dead which can eternal lie,
And with strange aeons even death may die.GÇ¥
-The Nameless City
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
18299
|
Posted - 2015.04.17 01:23:00 -
[4] - Quote
Patrick57 wrote: oh well, we're still superior :D
Patrick Amarr, best Amarr!
GÇ£That is not dead which can eternal lie,
And with strange aeons even death may die.GÇ¥
-The Nameless City
|
|
|
|