DUST Search - Again with the ringers sad sad sad... new rule

xPainx Pain wrote:

501st Headstrong wrote:

Give me an incentive to be in a small corp and I'll join one. If PC is made to be corp-only, you face a significant issue with most Vets upwards of 60 mil SP congregating into 1 corp vs corps with barely 20 mil per person. Massive disparity. I use to get mad about ringers, but then I realized...It's a game. I am friends/ neutral with a lot of people. Knowing that, just fight the battle and win. If you lose, you need to fight harder, not ask a team that's winning to stop. If you win, feel even prouder. It's why I love 0H. We fight with our own team, every single time, unless we are severely understaffed, as a corp should do. I feel so proud remembering when we'd lose battles, from now we are fairly well-off. Still a little rusty, but getting better.

Adapt, and #PRAISE THE PIPES, PRAISE MUNSON

And this is why this can be a good idea... I feel most of my teams with corp only. When we do win yes we feel proud. Now tell me ... Where is the pride in having someone fight your battles?

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
xPainx Pain Pendejitos Smart Deploy 15	Posted - 2015.02.05 13:41:00 - [1] - Quote A corp that defends there own with at least 90 % of the team being there own should gave more than one district until such district is not able to be kept or defended by such corp. That being said if any such corp uses another corp as 90 or 100% to fill in the team such corp does not deaserve to hold more than one district. If it us the last district than ringers are ok, for the attacking corp is violating the one district rule. Those who do not risk have already lost..
John ShepardIII Capital Acquisitions LLC Bad Intention 1247	Posted - 2015.02.05 15:12:00 - [2] - Quote xPainx Pain wrote: A corp that defends there own with at least 90 % of the team being there own should gave more than one district until such district is not able to be kept or defended by such corp. That being said if any such corp uses another corp as 90 or 100% to fill in the team such corp does not deaserve to hold more than one district. If it us the last district than ringers are ok, for the attacking corp is violating the one district rule. ** Rules #100% #** Rules #AE #Cap Aq #Insert random corp #Have No Fear John Shepard Is Here #lolRomans Boat #Praise Munson The True Shepard No longer a corp hopper Have No Fear. John Shepard Is Here!
Solar Qoio Chatelain Rapid Response Gallente Federation 96	Posted - 2015.02.05 15:45:00 - [3] - Quote Yes and another new rule... No trolling in the forums! Oh wait is that possible? The game might die if so... Don't mind me I'm just here to help. -Winner of the Solar's Par-8 Flaylock Pistol
MR MOJOO Capital Acquisitions LLC Bad Intention 20	Posted - 2015.02.05 15:46:00 - [4] - Quote xPainx Pain wrote: A corp that defends there own with at least 90 % of the team being there own should gave more than one district until such district is not able to be kept or defended by such corp. That being said if any such corp uses another corp as 90 or 100% to fill in the team such corp does not deaserve to hold more than one district. If it us the last district than ringers are ok, for the attacking corp is violating the one district rule. Well I'm glad that you brought that up on February 1, 2015 Utopian knigth asked cap aq for help in a pc against x-treme stars and the thing is that ex -ToP members always rang for x-treme against Utopian knights on February 2, 2015 it was battle day I asked a few of my members help me and they did 4 poeple of cap and 2 people of O.H(no names) and rest Utopian knights went against 9 ringers of ex-ToP and the rest x-treme and the end of the battle we took a **** on them So what I'm asking you to do is believe in yourself (this post was completely unnecessary) "Fuck off fucking scrub, bitch ass noob get good"~usuckatdust vagheitan
Funky Pshyco S.K.I.L.L OF G.O.D 11	Posted - 2015.02.05 15:57:00 - [5] - Quote Thid thread remind me the people of Pure Evil. People all they do is play with ringers , total crap.
Heimdallr69 Negative-Feedback. 4564	Posted - 2015.02.05 16:01:00 - [6] - Quote Funky Pshyco wrote: Thid thread remind me the people of Pure Evil. People all they do is play with ringers , total crap. It's a ringer corp, I've only fought OH who doesn't use ringers so it's kinda fun watching everyone else complain about it. Removed inappropriate content - CCP Logibro
Dust User KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 1626	Posted - 2015.02.05 16:49:00 - [7] - Quote New Rule: Let's all just fight and not care who's on either team.
John ShepardIII Capital Acquisitions LLC Bad Intention 1254	Posted - 2015.02.05 16:56:00 - [8] - Quote Dust User wrote: New Rule: Let's all just fight and not care who's on either team. Is that possible ??? The True Shepard No longer a corp hopper Have No Fear. John Shepard Is Here!
Silver Strike44 493	Posted - 2015.02.05 18:27:00 - [9] - Quote John ShepardIII wrote: xPainx Pain wrote: A corp that defends there own with at least 90 % of the team being there own should gave more than one district until such district is not able to be kept or defended by such corp. That being said if any such corp uses another corp as 90 or 100% to fill in the team such corp does not deaserve to hold more than one district. If it us the last district than ringers are ok, for the attacking corp is violating the one district rule. ** Rules #100% #** Rules #AE #Cap Aq #Insert random corp #Have No Fear John Shepard Is Here #lolRomans Boat #Praise Munson I agree. Especially on that last one. My YouTube Channel
Harry Bawlss Fatal Absolution 53	Posted - 2015.02.05 19:03:00 - [10] - Quote But isn't this game all about "mercenaries"?. It is kind of crappy to face a team with 14-15 ringers and one from the actual Corp, but in honesty can you really be mad about it because of game mechanics? If you are a regular pc player you should know you are going to be fighting mainly the same people over and over again.

xPainx Pain Pendejitos Smart Deploy 15	Posted - 2015.02.05 20:24:00 - [11] - Quote Then why even have a one district rule if at the end the higher tear corps are the only ones fighting? This will not let the smaller corps grow. One side brings ringers the other does the same and at the end it's the same people with different names. This I think can make things better for smaller corps and help more people come over to pc. Those who do not risk have already lost..
501st Headstrong 0uter.Heaven 835	Posted - 2015.02.05 21:08:00 - [12] - Quote Give me an incentive to be in a small corp and I'll join one. If PC is made to be corp-only, you face a significant issue with most Vets upwards of 60 mil SP congregating into 1 corp vs corps with barely 20 mil per person. Massive disparity. I use to get mad about ringers, but then I realized...It's a game. I am friends/ neutral with a lot of people. Knowing that, just fight the battle and win. If you lose, you need to fight harder, not ask a team that's winning to stop. If you win, feel even prouder. It's why I love 0H. We fight with our own team, every single time, unless we are severely understaffed, as a corp should do. I feel so proud remembering when we'd lose battles, from now we are fairly well-off. Still a little rusty, but getting better. Adapt, and #PRAISE THE PIPES, PRAISE MUNSON "There are no rights. The world owes no one a living."-Sumner Official 0uter.Heaven Mascot XD Moody come back SWBF3!!
xPainx Pain Pendejitos Smart Deploy 15	Posted - 2015.02.05 21:31:00 - [13] - Quote 501st Headstrong wrote: Give me an incentive to be in a small corp and I'll join one. If PC is made to be corp-only, you face a significant issue with most Vets upwards of 60 mil SP congregating into 1 corp vs corps with barely 20 mil per person. Massive disparity. I use to get mad about ringers, but then I realized...It's a game. I am friends/ neutral with a lot of people. Knowing that, just fight the battle and win. If you lose, you need to fight harder, not ask a team that's winning to stop. If you win, feel even prouder. It's why I love 0H. We fight with our own team, every single time, unless we are severely understaffed, as a corp should do. I feel so proud remembering when we'd lose battles, from now we are fairly well-off. Still a little rusty, but getting better. Adapt, and #PRAISE THE PIPES, PRAISE MUNSON And this is why this can be a good idea... I feel most of my teams with corp only. When we do win yes we feel proud. Now tell me ... Where is the pride in having someone fight your battles? Those who do not risk have already lost..
Heimdallr69 Negative-Feedback. 4573	Posted - 2015.02.05 21:53:00 - [14] - Quote xPainx Pain wrote: 501st Headstrong wrote: Give me an incentive to be in a small corp and I'll join one. If PC is made to be corp-only, you face a significant issue with most Vets upwards of 60 mil SP congregating into 1 corp vs corps with barely 20 mil per person. Massive disparity. I use to get mad about ringers, but then I realized...It's a game. I am friends/ neutral with a lot of people. Knowing that, just fight the battle and win. If you lose, you need to fight harder, not ask a team that's winning to stop. If you win, feel even prouder. It's why I love 0H. We fight with our own team, every single time, unless we are severely understaffed, as a corp should do. I feel so proud remembering when we'd lose battles, from now we are fairly well-off. Still a little rusty, but getting better. Adapt, and #PRAISE THE PIPES, PRAISE MUNSON And this is why this can be a good idea... I feel most of my teams with corp only. When we do win yes we feel proud. Now tell me ... Where is the pride in having someone fight your battles? We're mercs we don't have pride, we're a shady bunch. Removed inappropriate content - CCP Logibro
el OPERATOR Capital Acquisitions LLC Bad Intention 792	Posted - 2015.02.05 22:24:00 - [15] - Quote #Cap Acq #PraiseThePipes #PLCinPC-AllDamnDay Open-Beta Vet. Drunk Night Tree Burner. This is my Main and Original. DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR.
Viktor Hadah Jr Negative-Impact Back and Forth 7126	Posted - 2015.02.06 01:01:00 - [16] - Quote https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWgVdY3SfbI CBM EVE, Dust & Corp Services Buying Dead & Inactive Corps
Her Chosen Grade No.2 218	Posted - 2015.02.06 02:05:00 - [17] - Quote xPainx Pain wrote: Then why even have a one district rule if at the end the higher tear corps are the only ones fighting? This will not let the smaller corps grow. One side brings ringers the other does the same and at the end it's the same people with different names. This I think can make things better for smaller corps and help more people come over to pc. Bingo. MH eventually only has 3 corps fighting. When FA was formed to fight AE, those corps fought 10 battles against one another; weeks straight. Most of those battles took place on third party districts, as two opposing corps would hire the corps to fight either. If you're hiring ringers more than you're not, then your tags don't deserve a district attached to them. But, now that MH is a ghost system, who cares? Especially who cares what single district corps are doing. STRONG BOX ROLE CALL
Thermoris Togeras Random Gunz RISE of LEGION 102	Posted - 2015.02.06 03:36:00 - [18] - Quote xPainx Pain wrote: A corp that defends there own with at least 90 % of the team being there own should gave more than one district until such district is not able to be kept or defended by such corp. That being said if any such corp uses another corp as 90 or 100% to fill in the team such corp does not deaserve to hold more than one district. If it us the last district than ringers are ok, for the attacking corp is violating the one district rule. PC has no rules only agreements and agreements are easily broken Director and FC of RDGZ
Assert Dominance Ahrendee Mercenaries 831	Posted - 2015.02.06 04:00:00 - [19] - Quote fuk su normativa muchacho loco? esta es la conquista planetaria. hacemos lo que queremos. LogicGäó
xPainx Pain Pendejitos Smart Deploy 19	Posted - 2015.02.06 04:17:00 - [20] - Quote Assert Dominance wrote: fuk su normativa muchacho loco? esta es la conquista planetaria. hacemos lo que queremos. Hay Que tener huevos y enfrentar sus propias batallas. Ringers son para los miedosos. YA vi cada Quien a su bolsillo che put0s Those who do not risk have already lost..

Viktor Hadah Jr Negative-Impact Back and Forth 7127	Posted - 2015.02.06 06:30:00 - [21] - Quote Thermoris Togeras wrote: xPainx Pain wrote: A corp that defends there own with at least 90 % of the team being there own should gave more than one district until such district is not able to be kept or defended by such corp. That being said if any such corp uses another corp as 90 or 100% to fill in the team such corp does not deaserve to hold more than one district. If it us the last district than ringers are ok, for the attacking corp is violating the one district rule. PC has no rules only agreements and agreements are easily broken "Because I can" clause super-succeeds all PC rules. CBM EVE, Dust & Corp Services Buying Dead & Inactive Corps
THUNDERGROOVE Fatal Absolution 1433	Posted - 2015.02.06 08:01:00 - [22] - Quote xPainx Pain wrote: Then why even have a one district rule if at the end the higher tear corps are the only ones fighting? This will not let the smaller corps grow. One side brings ringers the other does the same and at the end it's the same people with different names. This I think can make things better for smaller corps and help more people come over to pc. Get good and people might want you to fight for them one day lol. I'm the Rayman of uplinks. 21 day EVE trial.
Harry Bawlss Fatal Absolution 57	Posted - 2015.02.06 14:44:00 - [23] - Quote THUNDERGROOVE wrote: xPainx Pain wrote: Then why even have a one district rule if at the end the higher tear corps are the only ones fighting? This will not let the smaller corps grow. One side brings ringers the other does the same and at the end it's the same people with different names. This I think can make things better for smaller corps and help more people come over to pc. Get good and people might want you to fight for them one day lol. Unlike you groove, nobody wants you... In fact nobody wants FA :(


Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Moody come back