| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
J0LLY R0G3R
And the ButtPirates
1675
   |
Posted - 2015.01.07 14:15:00 -
[1] - Quote
Why hello there. I enjoy the nerf remotes threads, so I'd like to make a thread to collect them. So If you are going to make another thread simply pop a link to it in here. Same goes for if you finda thread someonr else started. Ill update the main post as it goes. XD
TLDR : Last Dust Montage
|
J0LLY R0G3R
And the ButtPirates
1676
|
Posted - 2015.01.07 14:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
Saved
TLDR : Last Dust Montage
|
John Demonsbane
Unorganized Ninja Infantry Tactics
5050
|
Posted - 2015.01.07 14:35:00 -
[3] - Quote
Hello. I don't like things that kill me if I don't also use them. Nerf plz.
(The godfather of tactical logistics)
|
Prius Vecht
Red and Silver Hand
Amarr Empire
405
|
Posted - 2015.01.07 14:38:00 -
[4] - Quote
Easy Answer: its idiotic for REs to do twice the damage as tank mines with a huge damage radius, its even worse that you can frisbee them....they should be a focused charge/require a lengthy animation where you place the charge and do less than half the damage they do now.
they should have high efficacy vs tanks, installations and other vehicles. |
IVIaster LUKE
Lokun Listamenn
749
|
Posted - 2015.01.07 15:51:00 -
[5] - Quote
I personally love it when a game of Horseshoes breaks out.
"Dark-siders can be so brutish---Their minds are dulled by Light starvation!"
Jedi Master Sunrider.
|
Sinboto Simmons
Murphys-Law
General Tso's Alliance
7327
|
Posted - 2015.01.07 17:54:00 -
[6] - Quote
Prius Vecht wrote:Easy Answer: its idiotic for REs to do twice the damage as tank mines with a huge damage radius, its even worse that you can frisbee them....they should be a focused charge/require a lengthy animation where you place the charge and do less than half the damage they do now.
they should have high efficacy vs tanks, installations and other vehicles.
Um ok we can do this in order I think:
The proxy mines I think we can all agree are underpowered, certainly not a standard to balance other gear by at all, and five meters at all levels isn't what I would call 'huge'. (Actually while they are meters on paper as well in game the range on any explosive doesn't play as meters, more as feet)
The throw animation was added (I think, correct me if I'm wrong.) To counter the reduction of it's splash radius after chrome, and to utilize the new sticking mechanic, which helps greatly against tanks.
The removal of the throw mechanic not only hurts anti infantry but also anti vehicle properties, the placement animation being 'lengthy' would also harm both uses, and with current damage output being very high would make placing just one (also you need more than one to blow up even a lav) impossible within a combat zone.
Having the damage reduced by half is also detrimental to any alpha damage gear in general, it would be like requiring headshots with nova knives to get the damage multiplier from the charge, as sticking the REs would no longer be possible on any decent tanker. Regardless of a higher damage bonus, which I don't think tankers would like anyway, they already have enough gear targeting them I think.
The RE is similar to the forge gun or plasma canon in it's role, anti material not really for one or the other just made to destroy anything it lands a blow on, it's description actually states it's for both as well I believe.
Hope this helps, kinda tired so pardon any mistakes if you would. 
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 5 Prof 2
Born of the Brutor tribe
|
J0LLY R0G3R
And the ButtPirates
1678
|
Posted - 2015.01.07 20:18:00 -
[7] - Quote
Prius Vecht wrote:Easy Answer: its idiotic for REs to do twice the damage as tank mines with a huge damage radius, its even worse that you can frisbee them....they should be a focused charge/require a lengthy animation where you place the charge and do less than half the damage they do now.
they should have high efficacy vs tanks, installations and other vehicles.
You sir did not follow directions but I'll let it slid this time. XD
TLDR : Last Dust Montage
|
jjoemike10 O'Conner
120
|
Posted - 2015.01.08 03:45:00 -
[8] - Quote
J0LLY R0G3R wrote:Prius Vecht wrote:Easy Answer: its idiotic for REs to do twice the damage as tank mines with a huge damage radius, its even worse that you can frisbee them....they should be a focused charge/require a lengthy animation where you place the charge and do less than half the damage they do now.
they should have high efficacy vs tanks, installations and other vehicles. You sir did not follow directions but I'll let it slid this time. XD
BURN HIM |
jjoemike10 O'Conner
120
|
Posted - 2015.01.08 03:50:00 -
[9] - Quote
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2552785#post2552785 |
jjoemike10 O'Conner
120
|
Posted - 2015.01.08 03:51:00 -
[10] - Quote
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2550115#post2550115 |
|
|
jjoemike10 O'Conner
120
|
Posted - 2015.01.08 03:52:00 -
[11] - Quote
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2541504#post2541504 |
jjoemike10 O'Conner
120
|
Posted - 2015.01.08 03:53:00 -
[12] - Quote
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2449567#post2449567 |
jjoemike10 O'Conner
120
|
Posted - 2015.01.08 03:54:00 -
[13] - Quote
There. Made my contribution |
J0LLY R0G3R
And the ButtPirates
1699
|
Posted - 2015.01.08 15:17:00 -
[14] - Quote
jjoemike10 O'Conner wrote:There. Made my contribution
This guy is putting in work. Ill update the thread when I get off work.
TLDR : Last Dust Montage
|
taxi bastard
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
284
|
Posted - 2015.01.08 15:35:00 -
[15] - Quote
i would agree with not being able to throw them...only place or drop, but the damage is good as is |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |