| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Breakin Stuff
Goonfeet
Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
6001
   |
Posted - 2014.12.26 08:55:00 -
[1] - Quote
Can we get the control schemes being adjusted and made functional added to the roadmap as a priority please?
The DS3 controls are horrific
The m/kb controls are horrific.
This is hands-down the oldest un-addressed complaint on the forums and it has a noticable effect on the ability to play the game as well as enjoy playing.
EVE Online is what you get when engineers attempt to create "fun" without consulting someone who comprehends the word.
|
Breakin Stuff
Goonfeet
Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
6007
|
Posted - 2014.12.27 08:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
Bumping because I and many other players consider the controls to be hands-down the WORST aspect of playing DUST 514.
Please seriously consider addressing this.
EVE Online is what you get when engineers attempt to create "fun" without consulting someone who comprehends the word.
|
jordy mack
WarRavens
Capital Punishment.
244
|
Posted - 2014.12.27 16:27:00 -
[3] - Quote
bump for button mapping
Less QQ more PewPew
|
Alaika Arbosa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc.
2336
|
Posted - 2014.12.27 17:16:00 -
[4] - Quote
I've gotten used to the infantry controls though I would support button mapping.
However, I feel that vehicle control schemes are of more importance (this isn't to say that I don't support button mapping).
The other day I actually pulled out one of the few HAVs I have to try to fulfill a couple of my Daily missions, well, I noticed that they HAVs don't have the same control schemes available as the LAVs.
I find this to be ridiculous, why is it like this?
Amarr/Minmatar vehicles are OP (especially Minmatar speed tanks)
^The reason why CCP is afraid to release them
|
Breakin Stuff
Goonfeet
Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
6013
|
Posted - 2014.12.27 17:19:00 -
[5] - Quote
Alaika Arbosa wrote:I've gotten used to the infantry controls though I would support button mapping.
However, I feel that vehicle control schemes are of more importance (this isn't to say that I don't support button mapping).
The other day I actually pulled out one of the few HAVs I have to try to fulfill a couple of my Daily missions, well, I noticed that they HAVs don't have the same control schemes available as the LAVs.
I find this to be ridiculous, why is it like this?
WHen I say overhaul control schemes I meant ALL of them, not cherrypicking the infantry ones. All of the controles need to be made smoother, sensitivity upped and fine control added.
EVE Online is what you get when engineers attempt to create "fun" without consulting someone who comprehends the word.
|
Alaika Arbosa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc.
2336
|
Posted - 2014.12.27 17:23:00 -
[6] - Quote
Breakin Stuff wrote:Alaika Arbosa wrote:I've gotten used to the infantry controls though I would support button mapping.
However, I feel that vehicle control schemes are of more importance (this isn't to say that I don't support button mapping).
The other day I actually pulled out one of the few HAVs I have to try to fulfill a couple of my Daily missions, well, I noticed that they HAVs don't have the same control schemes available as the LAVs.
I find this to be ridiculous, why is it like this? WHen I say overhaul control schemes I meant ALL of them, not cherrypicking the infantry ones. All of the controles need to be made smoother, sensitivity upped and fine control added.
Awesome.
/signed
Amarr/Minmatar vehicles are OP (especially Minmatar speed tanks)
^The reason why CCP is afraid to release them
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |