DUST Search - Leave heavies the hell alone for the love of god CCP

Piercing Serenity wrote:

DarthPlagueis TheWise wrote:

If you're so damn anti-HMG, then just nerf the damage and the range CCP and leave it at that.

I can't bloody believe the turn speed BS is already being brought back up again. Nerfing the heavy in CQC is the dumbest goddamn thing I have ever heard. It will completely ruin the role and no one will use sentinels.

I can just see it now. A scout with a shotty dancing around you while all you can hit him with is your damn sidearm. They already do this to HMG heavies and come out on top.

So god damn sick of coming on this forum and hearing more people who don't even play heavy complain, or the ones that do who don't like the playstyle and just force themselves to use it, crying to CCP that they can't directly run up to a heavy, slap him in the face and get away with it.

I don't give a **** what you think, the heavy is a CQC role. Take his range away if you want but leave turn speed the hell alone damnit! You people are bound and determined to ruin the sentinel and cater to your precious scouts.

You should read the suggestions posed by Breakin and Fox

EVE Online is what you get when engineers attempt to create "fun" without consulting someone who comprehends the word.

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
DarthPlagueis TheWise 432	Posted - 2014.11.27 13:36:00 - [1] - Quote If you're so damn anti-HMG, then just nerf the damage and the range CCP and leave it at that. I can't bloody believe the turn speed BS is already being brought back up again. Nerfing the heavy in CQC is the dumbest goddamn thing I have ever heard. It will completely ruin the role and no one will use sentinels. I can just see it now. A scout with a shotty dancing around you while all you can hit him with is your damn sidearm. They already do this to HMG heavies and come out on top. So god damn sick of coming on this forum and hearing more people who don't even play heavy complain, or the ones that do who don't like the playstyle and just force themselves to use it, crying to CCP that they can't directly run up to a heavy, slap him in the face and get away with it. I don't give a **** what you think, the heavy is a CQC role. Take his range away if you want but leave turn speed the hell alone damnit! You people are bound and determined to ruin the sentinel and cater to your precious scouts. F*k this cash grab fix the shit that matters: unkillable uplinks, invisible remotes on null cannon hack panels, etc.
Breakin Stuff Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group 5386	Posted - 2014.11.27 15:51:00 - [2] - Quote 1/10 EVE Online is what you get when engineers attempt to create "fun" without consulting someone who comprehends the word.
Piercing Serenity PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies 738	Posted - 2014.11.27 16:26:00 - [3] - Quote DarthPlagueis TheWise wrote: If you're so damn anti-HMG, then just nerf the damage and the range CCP and leave it at that. I can't bloody believe the turn speed BS is already being brought back up again. Nerfing the heavy in CQC is the dumbest goddamn thing I have ever heard. It will completely ruin the role and no one will use sentinels. I can just see it now. A scout with a shotty dancing around you while all you can hit him with is your damn sidearm. They already do this to HMG heavies and come out on top. So god damn sick of coming on this forum and hearing more people who don't even play heavy complain, or the ones that do who don't like the playstyle and just force themselves to use it, crying to CCP that they can't directly run up to a heavy, slap him in the face and get away with it. I don't give a **** what you think, the heavy is a CQC role. Take his range away if you want but leave turn speed the hell alone damnit! You people are bound and determined to ruin the sentinel and cater to your precious scouts. You should read the suggestions posed by Breakin and Fox Closed Beta Vet (E3 Build), Former PFBHz Best Corps Battled (Personally): Imperfects, TeamPlayers, Hellstorm
Breakin Stuff Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group 5391	Posted - 2014.11.27 16:29:00 - [4] - Quote Piercing Serenity wrote: DarthPlagueis TheWise wrote: If you're so damn anti-HMG, then just nerf the damage and the range CCP and leave it at that. I can't bloody believe the turn speed BS is already being brought back up again. Nerfing the heavy in CQC is the dumbest goddamn thing I have ever heard. It will completely ruin the role and no one will use sentinels. I can just see it now. A scout with a shotty dancing around you while all you can hit him with is your damn sidearm. They already do this to HMG heavies and come out on top. So god damn sick of coming on this forum and hearing more people who don't even play heavy complain, or the ones that do who don't like the playstyle and just force themselves to use it, crying to CCP that they can't directly run up to a heavy, slap him in the face and get away with it. I don't give a **** what you think, the heavy is a CQC role. Take his range away if you want but leave turn speed the hell alone damnit! You people are bound and determined to ruin the sentinel and cater to your precious scouts. You should read the suggestions posed by Breakin and Fox I'm willing to bet he has. EVE Online is what you get when engineers attempt to create "fun" without consulting someone who comprehends the word.
Vitantur Nothus Nos Nothi 753	Posted - 2014.11.27 17:42:00 - [5] - Quote insta-spin-and-win! for the win!
DarthPlagueis TheWise 434	Posted - 2014.11.27 17:55:00 - [6] - Quote Vitantur Nothus wrote: insta-spin-and-win! for the win! Oh yeah because scouts can't Instantly spin around Instantly cloak Instantly sprint away from a firefight before dying Instantly scan any heavy Instantly hack an objective Instantly pop you with knives/shotty Instantly outstrafe you at medium range Instantly run circles around a heavy faster than the CURRENT TURN SPEED F*k this cash grab fix the shit that matters: unkillable uplinks, invisible remotes on null cannon hack panels, etc.


Pages: 1 :: [one page]