| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Apothecary Za'ki
Biomass Positive
1581
   |
Posted - 2014.11.04 21:52:00 -
[1] - Quote
.. one word got out that the "patch" before 1.9 some how got undone EVERYONE and their MOTHER is useing rail rifles again.. kill padding before they get fixed again i think :P
what do you the community think?
[[LogiBro ADV/PRO]]
[[Level 1 Forum Warrior]]
[[Level 2 Forum Pariah]]
|
Auris Lionesse
Kang Lo Directorate
Gallente Federation
1108
|
Posted - 2014.11.04 22:00:00 -
[2] - Quote
rail rifles were fine all the way back to 1.7
they never needed to be changed.
the problem was combat rifles out dpsing ar's and doing more damage per shot than scramblers at one point.
i dont know why people complain about rails.
Don't vote for iron wolf saber.
Vote for someone who will help the community i.e. anyone else.
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
17590
|
Posted - 2014.11.04 22:02:00 -
[3] - Quote
Quite a few old returnees are back and RRs from their time were pretty must staple guns for a long time.
CPM 1
Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior
\\= Prototype Forge Gun=// Unlocked
|
Apothecary Za'ki
Biomass Positive
1581
|
Posted - 2014.11.04 22:02:00 -
[4] - Quote
Auris Lionesse wrote:rail rifles were fine all the way back to 1.7
they never needed to be changed.
the problem was combat rifles out dpsing ar's and doing more damage per shot than scramblers at one point.
i dont know why people complain about rails.
where the hell ahve you been for all of 1.8? RR were dominant in CQB all the way to 100m or so... and i agree with the damage profile change on CR's but still its back to seeing nothing but RRs all over the battlefield since 1.9 came out
[[LogiBro ADV/PRO]]
[[Level 1 Forum Warrior]]
[[Level 2 Forum Pariah]]
|
Apothecary Za'ki
Biomass Positive
1581
|
Posted - 2014.11.04 22:04:00 -
[5] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Quite a few old returnees are back and RRs from their time were pretty must staple guns for a long time.
shame.. RR needs to be 1sec spoolup and ARR can be 0.30 that seems fair :P
[[LogiBro ADV/PRO]]
[[Level 1 Forum Warrior]]
[[Level 2 Forum Pariah]]
|
CharacterNameWasTaken
G0DS AM0NG MEN
General Tso's Alliance
192
|
Posted - 2014.11.04 22:04:00 -
[6] - Quote
Auris Lionesse wrote:rail rifles were fine all the way back to 1.7
they never needed to be changed.
the problem was combat rifles out dpsing ar's and doing more damage per shot than scramblers at one point.
i dont know why people complain about rails.
because being trained on by an auto snuper rifle from 100+ meters while getting hit by almost all of ths shots and not being ablw to get to cover pisses people off. |
CharacterNameWasTaken
G0DS AM0NG MEN
General Tso's Alliance
192
|
Posted - 2014.11.04 22:04:00 -
[7] - Quote
Auris Lionesse wrote:rail rifles were fine all the way back to 1.7
they never needed to be changed.
the problem was combat rifles out dpsing ar's and doing more damage per shot than scramblers at one point.
i dont know why people complain about rails.
forum lag keeps causing me to double post. |
Auris Lionesse
Kang Lo Directorate
Gallente Federation
1108
|
Posted - 2014.11.04 22:05:00 -
[8] - Quote
Apothecary Za'ki wrote:Auris Lionesse wrote:rail rifles were fine all the way back to 1.7
they never needed to be changed.
the problem was combat rifles out dpsing ar's and doing more damage per shot than scramblers at one point.
i dont know why people complain about rails. where the hell ahve you been for all of 1.8? RR were dominant in CQB all the way to 100m or so... and i agree with the damage profile change on CR's but still its back to seeing nothing but RRs all over the battlefield since 1.9 came out
i quit before 1.8 came out. my ps3 is no longer hooked up anyway.
doesnt change the fact that they were fine from day 1 and never needed to be overnerfed several times.
a combat rifle did 90-100 damage with 1200rpm and a rail rifle had to charge to do 50-60 with a low firerate.
their hate is unwarranted.
Don't vote for iron wolf saber.
Vote for someone who will help the community i.e. anyone else.
|
Auris Lionesse
Kang Lo Directorate
Gallente Federation
1108
|
Posted - 2014.11.04 22:06:00 -
[9] - Quote
CharacterNameWasTaken wrote:Auris Lionesse wrote:rail rifles were fine all the way back to 1.7
they never needed to be changed.
the problem was combat rifles out dpsing ar's and doing more damage per shot than scramblers at one point.
i dont know why people complain about rails. forum lag keeps causing me to double post.
was never a problem for me.
i only got killed by cbrs.
Don't vote for iron wolf saber.
Vote for someone who will help the community i.e. anyone else.
|
Auris Lionesse
Kang Lo Directorate
Gallente Federation
1108
|
Posted - 2014.11.04 22:08:00 -
[10] - Quote
CharacterNameWasTaken wrote:Auris Lionesse wrote:rail rifles were fine all the way back to 1.7
they never needed to be changed.
the problem was combat rifles out dpsing ar's and doing more damage per shot than scramblers at one point.
i dont know why people complain about rails. forum lag keeps causing me to double post.
yeah its fine, happened to me earlier.
Don't vote for iron wolf saber.
Vote for someone who will help the community i.e. anyone else.
|
|
|
DDx77
Kinsho Swords
Caldari State
17
|
Posted - 2014.11.04 22:28:00 -
[11] - Quote
Auris Lionesse wrote:rail rifles were fine all the way back to 1.7
they never needed to be changed.
the problem was combat rifles out dpsing ar's and doing more damage per shot than scramblers at one point.
i dont know why people complain about rails.
This is especially true of the breach AR |
Apothecary Za'ki
Biomass Positive
1581
|
Posted - 2014.11.04 22:48:00 -
[12] - Quote
Auris Lionesse wrote:Apothecary Za'ki wrote:Auris Lionesse wrote:rail rifles were fine all the way back to 1.7
they never needed to be changed.
the problem was combat rifles out dpsing ar's and doing more damage per shot than scramblers at one point.
i dont know why people complain about rails. where the hell ahve you been for all of 1.8? RR were dominant in CQB all the way to 100m or so... and i agree with the damage profile change on CR's but still its back to seeing nothing but RRs all over the battlefield since 1.9 came out i quit before 1.8 came out. my ps3 is no longer hooked up anyway. doesnt change the fact that they were fine from day 1 and never needed to be overnerfed several times. a combat rifle did 90-100 damage with 1200rpm and a rail rifle had to charge to do 50-60 with a low firerate. their hate is unwarranted. i used rail rifles exclusively because i was sick of ars. the combat rifle was way more deadly than the rail ever was.
if you are not currently activly playing you revoke the right to even comment at this point
[[LogiBro ADV/PRO]]
[[Level 1 Forum Warrior]]
[[Level 2 Forum Pariah]]
|
Apothecary Za'ki
Biomass Positive
1581
|
Posted - 2014.11.04 22:49:00 -
[13] - Quote
DDx77 wrote:Auris Lionesse wrote:rail rifles were fine all the way back to 1.7
they never needed to be changed.
the problem was combat rifles out dpsing ar's and doing more damage per shot than scramblers at one point.
i dont know why people complain about rails.
This is especially true of the breach AR
breach ar 71m max RR 101m max. and has a zoom sight
[[LogiBro ADV/PRO]]
[[Level 1 Forum Warrior]]
[[Level 2 Forum Pariah]]
|
Apothecary Za'ki
Biomass Positive
1581
|
Posted - 2014.11.04 22:49:00 -
[14] - Quote
Auris Lionesse wrote:CharacterNameWasTaken wrote:Auris Lionesse wrote:rail rifles were fine all the way back to 1.7
they never needed to be changed.
the problem was combat rifles out dpsing ar's and doing more damage per shot than scramblers at one point.
i dont know why people complain about rails. forum lag keeps causing me to double post. was never a problem for me. i only got killed by cbrs.
you mean FOTM scouts.
[[LogiBro ADV/PRO]]
[[Level 1 Forum Warrior]]
[[Level 2 Forum Pariah]]
|
CharacterNameWasTaken
G0DS AM0NG MEN
General Tso's Alliance
194
|
Posted - 2014.11.05 01:22:00 -
[15] - Quote
Apothecary Za'ki wrote:Auris Lionesse wrote:CharacterNameWasTaken wrote:Auris Lionesse wrote:rail rifles were fine all the way back to 1.7
they never needed to be changed.
the problem was combat rifles out dpsing ar's and doing more damage per shot than scramblers at one point.
i dont know why people complain about rails. forum lag keeps causing me to double post. was never a problem for me. i only got killed by cbrs. you mean FOTM scouts.
^ i think you need to read what your quoting lionesse and apothecary not every fotm scouts used cbrs i mostly saw them with rrs but thats a weird thing for a cloaky scout to have so i could never understand why they used it. |
CharacterNameWasTaken
G0DS AM0NG MEN
General Tso's Alliance
194
|
Posted - 2014.11.05 01:22:00 -
[16] - Quote
Apothecary Za'ki wrote:Auris Lionesse wrote:CharacterNameWasTaken wrote:Auris Lionesse wrote:rail rifles were fine all the way back to 1.7
they never needed to be changed.
the problem was combat rifles out dpsing ar's and doing more damage per shot than scramblers at one point.
i dont know why people complain about rails. forum lag keeps causing me to double post. was never a problem for me. i only got killed by cbrs. you mean FOTM scouts.
^ i think you need to read what your quoting lionesse and apothecary not every fotm scouts used cbrs i mostly saw them with rrs but thats a weird thing for a cloaky scout to have so i could never understand why they used it. |
Apothecary Za'ki
Biomass Positive
1586
|
Posted - 2014.11.05 01:25:00 -
[17] - Quote
CharacterNameWasTaken wrote:Apothecary Za'ki wrote:Auris Lionesse wrote:CharacterNameWasTaken wrote:Auris Lionesse wrote:rail rifles were fine all the way back to 1.7
they never needed to be changed.
the problem was combat rifles out dpsing ar's and doing more damage per shot than scramblers at one point.
i dont know why people complain about rails. forum lag keeps causing me to double post. was never a problem for me. i only got killed by cbrs. you mean FOTM scouts. ^ i think you need to read what your quoting lionesse and apothecary not every fotm scouts used cbrs i mostly saw them with rrs but thats a weird thing for a cloaky scout to have so i could never understand why they used it.
i thought you ment CR's but you mean Breach ARs right?
[[LogiBro ADV/PRO]]
[[Level 1 Forum Warrior]]
[[Level 2 Forum Pariah]]
|
CharacterNameWasTaken
G0DS AM0NG MEN
General Tso's Alliance
194
|
Posted - 2014.11.05 13:31:00 -
[18] - Quote
^ no i was talking about Rail Rifles |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |