| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
SoTa Senpai
Ametat Security
Amarr Empire
194
   |
Posted - 2014.09.29 15:45:00 -
[1] - Quote
Wouldn't it make sense to cut the price on clone packs for corps with no districts?
organizing your own team of 16 to fight another team of 16 is where this game fun really lies, but there's no reason to work so much to just enjoy a single match you'll likely lose to established corps.
So, give them price cuts, discounts, until they're able to obtain land. This will work as a great method for corps who just want to 16 vs 16 without actually holding land, yet still fight it out with the other corps. Long as prices are low and they don't hold anything - they can continue to fight, as mercenaries even, at a cheap price.
However, holding land should seriously, hold value. But not as much as before. Just cut down the amount of ISK generated compared to last time and reinstate it.
|
valad II
NoGameNoLife
141
|
Posted - 2014.09.29 15:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
SoTa Senpai wrote:Wouldn't it make sense to cut the price on clone packs for corps with no districts?
organizing your own team of 16 to fight another team of 16 is where this game fun really lies, but there's no reason to work so much to just enjoy a single match you'll likely lose to established corps.
So, give them price cuts, discounts, until they're able to obtain land. This will work as a great method for corps who just want to 16 vs 16 without actually holding land, yet still fight it out with the other corps. Long as prices are low and they don't hold anything - they can continue to fight, as mercenaries even, at a cheap price.
However, holding land should seriously, hold value. But not as much as before. Just cut down the amount of ISK generated compared to last time and reinstate it.
NO. |
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe.
General Tso's Alliance
4767
|
Posted - 2014.09.29 15:50:00 -
[3] - Quote
SoTa Senpai wrote:Wouldn't it make sense to cut the price on clone packs for corps with no districts?
organizing your own team of 16 to fight another team of 16 is where this game fun really lies, but there's no reason to work so much to just enjoy a single match you'll likely lose to established corps.
So, give them price cuts, discounts, until they're able to obtain land. This will work as a great method for corps who just want to 16 vs 16 without actually holding land, yet still fight it out with the other corps. Long as prices are low and they don't hold anything - they can continue to fight, as mercenaries even, at a cheap price.
However, holding land should seriously, hold value. But not as much as before. Just cut down the amount of ISK generated compared to last time and reinstate it.
First step might be to give ISK to players that enter battles in squads.
If we get the number down to 50% of players in battles deploying solo then we can talk about PC.
Current playerbase in general seems to be miles and miles if not light years from thinking about PC.
Level 4 Forum Warrior
PSN: wbrom42
|
Atiim
12596
|
Posted - 2014.09.29 16:16:00 -
[4] - Quote
At first I though that increased end-match payouts would balance out the loss of Passive ISK, but since you only get ISK for winning this encourages players to only attack weak and new corps, as that's the only way to ensure a profit.
Not only that, but there's no incentive, nor practical purpose to holding more than 1 district.
The 1st Matari Commando
-HAND
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution
17918
|
Posted - 2014.09.29 16:57:00 -
[5] - Quote
It's a little sad that the only reason anyone plays PC anymore is because it's literally the only place you can fight with proper teams.
The forums have ruined me.
|
John ShepardIII
DUST University
726
|
Posted - 2014.09.29 17:02:00 -
[6] - Quote
SoTa Senpai wrote:Wouldn't it make sense to cut the price on clone packs for corps with no districts?
organizing your own team of 16 to fight another team of 16 is where this game fun really lies, but there's no reason to work so much to just enjoy a single match you'll likely lose to established corps.
So, give them price cuts, discounts, until they're able to obtain land. This will work as a great method for corps who just want to 16 vs 16 without actually holding land, yet still fight it out with the other corps. Long as prices are low and they don't hold anything - they can continue to fight, as mercenaries even, at a cheap price.
However, holding land should seriously, hold value. But not as much as before. Just cut down the amount of ISK generated compared to last time and reinstate it.
This is a good idea +1 for you
The True Shepard.
Helping noobs everywhere
|
Viktor Hadah Jr
Negative-Impact
Gentlemen's.Club
5226
|
Posted - 2014.09.29 17:19:00 -
[7] - Quote
It would make it easier to farm and lock districts from alt corps.
EVE 21 Day Trial
|
valad II
NoGameNoLife
143
|
Posted - 2014.09.29 17:29:00 -
[8] - Quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neEevCiZjfc |
Immortal John Ripper
24890
|
Posted - 2014.09.29 17:34:00 -
[9] - Quote
Atiim wrote:
Not only that, but there's no incentive, nor practical purpose to holding more than 1 district.
unless you have a large corp that can actively use those districts. no sense for a few good players in a small corp to hoard more land than a larger corp with weaker players. Since pc is no longer competitive, and interest has died down... Things have changed and land ownership should reflect these changes. The more practice these scrubby people get, the sooner pc can start being fun again without facing the exact same damn people every game because no one else knows how to fight back...
Hey I just met you, and this is crazy
Now heres my number : 192.168.0.6:5555
Ping me maybe?
|
SoTa Senpai
Ametat Security
Amarr Empire
197
|
Posted - 2014.09.29 18:05:00 -
[10] - Quote
Viktor Hadah Jr wrote:It would make it easier to farm and lock districts from alt corps.
Locking districts wouldn't be possible if they just set it so corp has to be a certain size to participate.
Which feeds into the whole concept of corp leveling I wanted back in closed beta - corp members would get taxed SP as well that the corp can spend to unlock PC. |
|
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
16894
|
Posted - 2014.09.29 18:11:00 -
[11] - Quote
I think there can be much better results if we nuke pc and start over in terms of rules, how clones are gained, and takes overs are done.
Meanwhile as others said this is a highly exploitable move.
CPM 1
Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior
\\= Prototype Sniper Rifles =// Unlocked
|
Viktor Hadah Jr
Negative-Impact
Gentlemen's.Club
5227
|
Posted - 2014.09.29 18:21:00 -
[12] - Quote
SoTa Senpai wrote:Viktor Hadah Jr wrote:It would make it easier to farm and lock districts from alt corps. Locking districts wouldn't be possible if they just set it so corp has to be a certain size to participate. Which feeds into the whole concept of corp leveling I wanted back in closed beta - corp members would get taxed SP as well that the corp can spend to unlock PC.
Get 20 alts or even 20 recruits is not that hard look at Fac warfare army or duna corp
EVE 21 Day Trial
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |