DUST Search - pythons need a pg buff

All Channels

General Discussions

pythons need a pg buff

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
saxonmish Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance 314	Posted - 2014.08.27 17:23:00 - [1] - Quote I'm thinking a buff of like 250 pg will be alright SLAYER.
Atiim 11654	Posted - 2014.08.27 17:27:00 - [2] - Quote We could just reduce the CPU/PG of Small/20GJ Turrets. DUST 514's 1st Matari Commando -HAND
saxonmish Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance 314	Posted - 2014.08.27 17:30:00 - [3] - Quote Atiim wrote: We could just reduce the CPU/PG of Small/20GJ Turrets. or increase the pg upgrade mod SLAYER.
Vulpes Dolosus Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1926	Posted - 2014.08.27 17:39:00 - [4] - Quote Eh, I'm ok with this. I messed around with protofits and really could only milk out an extra 400 shields above my normal fit. This could also possibly encourage side gunners without compromising tank too much, but I haven't looked to much into that.
Rusty Shallows Caldari State 2031	Posted - 2014.08.27 17:44:00 - [5] - Quote I'd kill for an extra 50pg on the IW Saga. I have a lot of respect for Classic Logis. New Eden could use more Healers. Forums > Game: Biggest understatement ever
Vulpes Dolosus Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1926	Posted - 2014.08.27 17:55:00 - [6] - Quote Rusty Shallows wrote: I'd kill for an extra 50pg on the IW Saga. The Saga, Myron, and to a lesser extent the Grimsnes and Methana need serious rework. The Myron worst of all.
Pvt Numnutz Prophets of the Velocirapture 1844	Posted - 2014.08.27 19:58:00 - [7] - Quote With that we could fit a couple hundred more shields. Nothing in lows worth replacing so yeah basically more shields. Master Skyshark rider Kaalaka dakka tamer
bamboo x Eternal Beings Proficiency V. 1046	Posted - 2014.08.27 20:28:00 - [8] - Quote no. forge gunners just got a fitting nerf. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO *Eternal Beings* - #76 in All Time WP - #90 in All Time Kills. Member since day one, 10 months ago.
HOWDIDHEKILLME Dying to Reload 406	Posted - 2014.08.27 20:44:00 - [9] - Quote saxonmish wrote: I'm thinking a buff of like 250 pg will be alright So it will perform like your incubus?!? Hellllllll no!!! Lonewolf till I die
saxonmish Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance 315	Posted - 2014.08.27 20:51:00 - [10] - Quote HOWDIDHEKILLME wrote: saxonmish wrote: I'm thinking a buff of like 250 pg will be alright So it will perform like your incubus?!? Hellllllll no!!! there small rail needs a nerf then SLAYER.

Zindorak 1.U.P 698	Posted - 2014.08.27 21:09:00 - [11] - Quote +1 yea i agree Pokemon master! CCP undo ScP nerf. It hurt my feering very bad
Darth-Carbonite GIO Abandoned Privilege Top Men. 746	Posted - 2014.08.27 21:30:00 - [12] - Quote I'd love a python buff, of almost any sort Living proof that the Amarr can't do anything without the Caldari
Yeeeuuuupppp Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire 558	Posted - 2014.08.27 23:14:00 - [13] - Quote The only buff I would like at the moment is the resistance to vehicle collision, so incubus' can't fuckin ram you and continue flying... I'd probably only use the extra pg for a second gun, since 3.2k shields is enough for me.. Whatever won't break pythons, I'm all for Wannabe Slayer PSN: GMANCASH Rage Proficiency V
Soulja Ghostface MCDUSTDONALDS Top Men. 2664	Posted - 2014.08.27 23:18:00 - [14] - Quote 600 more shields Price reduction Pg buff More resilient to collisions Bring These Back i Tanker Turned Ads Pilot !
Rusty Shallows Caldari State 2032	Posted - 2014.08.27 23:27:00 - [15] - Quote bamboo x wrote: no. forge gunners just got a fitting nerf. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Charlie did wonders for the usefulness of Forge Guns. The first answer to any vehicle should be a Large Rail. If forced to go infantry AV then do Swarms. Only whip out a FG if you're in a Hipster mood. Very cool and stylish but inefficient. I have a lot of respect for Classic Logis. New Eden could use more Healers. Forums > Game: Biggest understatement ever
saxonmish Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance 315	Posted - 2014.08.27 23:34:00 - [16] - Quote Rusty Shallows wrote: bamboo x wrote: no. forge gunners just got a fitting nerf. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Charlie did wonders for the usefulness of Forge Guns. The first answer to any vehicle should be a Large Rail. If forced to go infantry AV then do Swarms. Only whip out a FG if you're in a Hipster mood. Very cool and stylish but inefficient. FG is very efficient https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uXAu1_hsWE watch and learn SLAYER.
ladwar SHAKING BABIES FACTION WARFARE ALLIANCE 2076	Posted - 2014.08.28 01:54:00 - [17] - Quote If they only added that 600 hp i wouldn't have to slap on a heavy extender just to prevent from getting one shot. seriously add that change back in Level 2 Forum Warrior, bitter vet. I shall smite Thy Trolls with numbers and truth doing reviews in free time, want 1?
TYCHUS MAXWELL The Fun Police 528	Posted - 2014.08.28 02:12:00 - [18] - Quote If the Python gets more e/hp I'm not sure how balanced that will be in relation to the Incubus. My proto breach forge can two shot pretty much any Python or Incubus without a hardener being applied. Right now any serious Anti air weapons are all armor profiled. This means that although the incubus has more e/hp it also takes more damage from forges, swarms, missles, and rails. Also keep in mind, that a Caldari Dropship is quite a bit skinnier frame wise than the Gallente Dropships. This means that for anything but the swarms, it is more difficult to hit than an Incubus when it's dancing through the sky with its evasive maneuvers. Right now I actually prefer to see Incubus ships because they are significantly easier to shoot down and their weakspot is gigantic. I still haven't even figured out where the Python's weakspot is located. Also keep in mind shield hardeners have double the bonus to resistance than armor hardeners.
Rusty Shallows Caldari State 2032	Posted - 2014.08.28 02:13:00 - [19] - Quote saxonmish wrote: Rusty Shallows wrote: bamboo x wrote: no. forge gunners just got a fitting nerf. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Charlie did wonders for the usefulness of Forge Guns. The first answer to any vehicle should be a Large Rail. If forced to go infantry AV then do Swarms. Only whip out a FG if you're in a Hipster mood. Very cool and stylish but inefficient. FG is very efficient https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uXAu1_hsWE watch and learn Fun Fact: Back in the day a montage video was presented as proof that the Flaylock was OP. We all know how that story ended. I used Forge Guns from a lot from second round Closed Beta until December of 2013. If you want to discuss them that's great but there is nothing you've done that I have not except for pulling out the officer. I hoard those like Scrooge McDuck. Glad you are having a blast Saxonmish. Keep at it! I have a lot of respect for Classic Logis. New Eden could use more Healers. Forums > Game: Biggest understatement ever
ladwar SHAKING BABIES FACTION WARFARE ALLIANCE 2076	Posted - 2014.08.28 02:31:00 - [20] - Quote TYCHUS MAXWELL wrote: If the Python gets more e/hp I'm not sure how balanced that will be in relation to the Incubus. My proto breach forge can two shot pretty much any Python or Incubus without a hardener being applied. Right now any serious Anti air weapons are all armor profiled. This means that although the incubus has more e/hp it also takes more damage from forges, swarms, missles, and rails. Also keep in mind, that a Caldari Dropship is quite a bit skinnier frame wise than the Gallente Dropships. This means that for anything but the swarms, it is more difficult to hit than an Incubus when it's dancing through the sky with its evasive maneuvers. Right now I actually prefer to see Incubus ships because they are significantly easier to shoot down and their weakspot is gigantic. I still haven't even figured out where the Python's weakspot is located. Also keep in mind shield hardeners have double the bonus to resistance than armor hardeners. Same spot, u see the aft end of a ads shoot it 4 most damage its just as large. Btw theirs last longer and will always have any effect while active. Level 2 Forum Warrior, bitter vet. I shall smite Thy Trolls with numbers and truth doing reviews in free time, want 1?

Anjelique Avengineer SHAKING BABIES FACTION WARFARE ALLIANCE 17	Posted - 2014.08.28 03:02:00 - [21] - Quote remove collision damage dealt by mlt dropships should fix the python
Anmol Singh G0DS AM0NG MEN General Tso's Alliance 850	Posted - 2014.08.28 03:20:00 - [22] - Quote Atiim wrote: We could just reduce the CPU/PG of Small/20GJ Turrets. That would also help out tankers. A python PG buff would be nice. It's quite annyoing having to permanently fill low slot with a PG extender. If you try to fill it with armor repair or Ammo, PG is so limited you're going to be using STD mods and turrets. *Sagaris lover!!!* Commando <3
Riptalis Horizons' Edge Proficiency V. 55	Posted - 2014.08.28 04:18:00 - [23] - Quote The Python is good in its position at the moment. First, above all, fix the collision damage! This should be the #1 priority but instead it's been sitting there useless! Logistics ak.0 ADS Pilot PSN: Riptalis


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.