| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
LT SHANKS
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
3238
   |
Posted - 2014.08.21 03:06:00 -
[1] - Quote
give me more WP than killing a player decked out in proto?
I knifed a dude out of his LAV and was on my way to destroy it. I threw a flux and bam, +75 WP. So, I dropped a hive down and waited for the shields to recharge: which didn't take long at all. I then repeated this over and over until the Onikuma eventually blew up for unknown reasons. Many underserved +75s were had, but I felt no shame.
So, should vehicle damage WP be reduced? |
TechMechMeds
Level 5 Forum Warrior
5262
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 03:30:00 -
[2] - Quote
Thanks lol.
"Oh, look!,
There's, uh, two women f ing a polar bear".
"Don't tell me those things".
|
Breakin Stuff
Goonfeet
Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
2278
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 03:37:00 -
[3] - Quote
LT SHANKS wrote:give me more WP than killing a player decked out in proto? I knifed a dude out of his LAV and was on my way to destroy it. I threw a flux and bam, +75 WP. So, I dropped a hive down and waited for the shields to recharge: which didn't take long at all. I then repeated this over and over until the Onikuma eventually blew up for unknown reasons. Many underserved +75s were had, but I felt no shame. So, should vehicle damage WP be reduced?
No.
Vehicles autodestruct after the owner is outside a certain range for longer than a minute. |
Thumb Green
Raymond James Corp
1269
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 03:41:00 -
[4] - Quote
How about no damage WP's if there's nobody inside of it?
At the RJC we don't kick ass, we kick dick and we kick it hard.
Kill Scotty
|
Atiim
11548
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 03:44:00 -
[5] - Quote
LT SHANKS wrote:So, should vehicle damage WP be reduced?
No, it should not be. Literally every other role in the game can place 1st on the scoreboard by performing well, and I fail to see why AV should be an exception.
What does need to happen however, is a shorter time for LAVs to be inactive before the vehicle self-destructs.
DUST 514's 1st Matari Commando
-HAND
|
Fizzer XCIV
Company of Marcher Lords
Amarr Empire
121
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 03:47:00 -
[6] - Quote
Atiim wrote:LT SHANKS wrote:So, should vehicle damage WP be reduced? No, it should not be. Literally every other role in the game can place 1st on the scoreboard by performing well, and I fail to see why AV should be an exception. What does need to happen however, is a shorter time for LAVs to be inactive before the vehicle self-destructs.
How about diminishing returns for WPs that are happening withing a short period of time?
75...75...50...25...25...25... |
Tectonic Fusion
2045
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 05:00:00 -
[7] - Quote
Fizzer XCIV wrote:Atiim wrote:LT SHANKS wrote:So, should vehicle damage WP be reduced? No, it should not be. Literally every other role in the game can place 1st on the scoreboard by performing well, and I fail to see why AV should be an exception. What does need to happen however, is a shorter time for LAVs to be inactive before the vehicle self-destructs. How about diminishing returns for WPs that are happening withing a short period of time? 75...75...50...25...25...25...
Because LAV spam. We deserve those WPs for destroying enemy roadblocks so you guys can hack the point.
|
M1A1 Blaster Master
Capital Acquisitions LLC
General Tso's Alliance
26
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 05:03:00 -
[8] - Quote
I have 2 different LAV BPOs. When I get to where I am going I just leave them. Do with them what you want, no skin out of my wallet. |
Sgt Buttscratch
R 0 N 1 N
2355
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 05:05:00 -
[9] - Quote
It's fine. You had an easy run, the whole time you were stood with a hive fluxing a vacant LAV, you were a sitting duck.
Give me my scrambler pistol back....**
|
I-Shayz-I
I----------I
4643
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 08:02:00 -
[10] - Quote
Try shooting small missiles at a armor LAV with all reps
You'll get so many wp.
7162 wp with a Repair Tool!
List of Legion Feedback Threads!
|
|
|
Atiim
11554
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 11:00:00 -
[11] - Quote
Fizzer XCIV wrote:Atiim wrote:LT SHANKS wrote:So, should vehicle damage WP be reduced? No, it should not be. Literally every other role in the game can place 1st on the scoreboard by performing well, and I fail to see why AV should be an exception. What does need to happen however, is a shorter time for LAVs to be inactive before the vehicle self-destructs. How about diminishing returns for WPs that are happening withing a short period of time? 75...75...50...25...25...25...
So basically punish people who are using Assault SLs or fighting multiple vehicles? No thanks.
It's not broken, so let's not fix it.
DUST 514's 1st Matari Commando
-HAND
|
Chunky Munkey
5143
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 15:37:00 -
[12] - Quote
Atiim wrote:[quote=LT SHANKS]
What does need to happen however, is a shorter time for LAVs to be inactive before the vehicle self-destructs.
Absolutely not. In the time it takes for someone to jump out of a LAV, hack an objective, and return to the LAV, the thing has started its suicidal countdown.
The method of potential WP farming mentioned in this thread does not seem to be prolific enough to justify your suggestion.
Destiny won't kill Dust.
CCP already did that.
|
CELESTA AUNGM
Kang Lo Directorate
Gallente Federation
224
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 16:42:00 -
[13] - Quote
I THINK, that the attacker is making a wrong conclusion about what he/she did...
I'm not sure why you threw a FLUX grenade at an unoccupied vehicle (since flux-es are supposed to unstabilize the sheild-envelope only, and not be able to damage ARMOUR or surface).
I believe we had a debate a long while ago whether "75 WP damage to X-men's private jet" should be awarded when you haven't DAMAGED the jet at all, your attack simply made the vehicle's shield do its job (which is to absorb a blast and PREVENT damage to the vehicle).
Is cancelling someone's sheild momentarily the same as DAMAGE to the vehicle? I thought CCP' designed it to function as a NO to that question.
And Breakin-STuff's response is very correct. YOU didn't deestroy the Lav wtih Flux-es. It self-destructed.
But is it verifed and TRUE, that you get Damage-WP credit just for reducing a vehicle's sheild without nicking it's armour???
Universe of good wishes for the 49, especially CCP Eterne...
No story can have life without writers and publishers.
|
LT SHANKS
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
3243
|
Posted - 2014.08.22 00:17:00 -
[14] - Quote
CELESTA AUNGM wrote:YOU didn't deestroy the Lav wtih Flux-es. It self-destructed.
Did you bother to read my opening post at all. I never claimed to have destroyed the LAV. As stated earlier, "the Onikuma eventually blew up for unknown reasons."
It's so funny how you emphasized "YOU" in your statement as well. Lol.
Anyway, fluxes do grant WP for vehicle shield damage. If it's hard for you to believe, try it out yourself. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |