| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
The dark cloud
The Rainbow Effect
3741
   |
Posted - 2014.07.28 15:08:00 -
[1] - Quote
I would really like it if LAV's would get the same rate of fire bonus like assault dropships. That would make them actually a threat rather then beeing laughed at. So could you please rename the "caldari/gallente assault dropship" skillbook into "caldari/gallente assault vehicles"? Then you just link the LAV's to that skill and now you have ADS and LAV's sharing the same skillbook. And it wouldnt hurt the gameplay to give LAV's a actual bonus for small turrets.
New shield module!
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
2544
|
Posted - 2014.07.28 15:22:00 -
[2] - Quote
This is the sort of thing I expected to Scout LAV to have back in the day. I think in general the idea of using LAVs for actual....you know, attacking, is a good one. |
The dark cloud
The Rainbow Effect
3741
|
Posted - 2014.07.28 15:27:00 -
[3] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:This is the sort of thing I expected to Scout LAV to have back in the day. I think in general the idea of using LAVs for actual....you know, attacking, is a good one.
Nah scout LAV's where supposed to be quicker. However they had less HP then a militia LAV and the fact that you flip your ride upside down at allmost every little bump on the road killed the idea. Instead every 1 went with logi LAV's which where allmost indestructable.
New shield module!
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
2544
|
Posted - 2014.07.28 15:36:00 -
[4] - Quote
The dark cloud wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:This is the sort of thing I expected to Scout LAV to have back in the day. I think in general the idea of using LAVs for actual....you know, attacking, is a good one. Nah scout LAV's where supposed to be quicker. However they had less HP then a militia LAV and the fact that you flip your ride upside down at allmost every little bump on the road killed the idea. Instead every 1 went with logi LAV's which where allmost indestructable.
Well yes, I suppose Assault LAV would be more appropriate to maintain consistency in the nomenclature? |
The dark cloud
The Rainbow Effect
3742
|
Posted - 2014.07.28 15:45:00 -
[5] - Quote
Well the name itself allready is "Light Assault Vehicle" so adding another assault infront of the name looks a bit silly.
New shield module!
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
2545
|
Posted - 2014.07.28 16:42:00 -
[6] - Quote
I always thought it was Light Attack Vehicle? Well regardless of the name, a bonus like this is a good idea. |
Peregrinuus
21
|
Posted - 2014.07.28 17:44:00 -
[7] - Quote
Only if basic HAVs and dropships get a skill bonus as well. There should be no reason why you can train LAV beyond level 1 but not HAV beyond 1 or dropship beyond 3.
Otherwise any LAV bonus must come from a specialized vehicle: SLAV, LLAV, or ALAV. I'm thinking LAV should instead stand for Light Armor Vehicle, which would then give you the Assault Light Armor Vehicle.
Hi.
|
The dark cloud
The Rainbow Effect
3744
|
Posted - 2014.07.28 17:48:00 -
[8] - Quote
Peregrinuus wrote:Only if basic HAVs and dropships get a skill bonus as well. There should be no reason why you can train LAV beyond level 1 but not HAV beyond 1 or dropship beyond 3.
Otherwise any LAV bonus must come from a specialized vehicle: SLAV, LLAV, or ALAV. I'm thinking LAV should instead stand for Light Armor Vehicle, which would then give you the Assault Light Armor Vehicle.
I suggested this because there is no variant for that. Tanks have 3 turrets and normal dropships can fit 2. The reason why i want this is because LAV's are the most fragile vehicle in the game and could need a bit more firepower. And additionally you need 2 people to make a LAV actually work. The gunner and the driver. Both can be shot out of the LAV at any given time aswell.
New shield module!
|
Atiim
Onslaught Inc
RISE of LEGION
11017
|
Posted - 2014.07.28 18:29:00 -
[9] - Quote
In my opinion, the LAVs should get the ADS' bonus.
And nothing of value was lost that day...
-HAND
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |