| Pages: 1  :: [one page] | 
      
      
        | Author | Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) | 
      
      
        |  OP FOTM
 Commando Perkone
 Caldari State
 
 99
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.06.30 03:52:00 -
          [1] - Quote 
 I think this is pretty sad. I overlooked it until someone pointed it out to me, because I don't play the game to farm WP unless I'm using my Logi, and when I pull out my AV I'm trying to kill vehicles and that's my sole focus.
 
 But wasn't the whole point to reward AV users to encourage new players to skill into AV, and old players to pull it out when a vehicle starts messing their team up?
 
 That's not much of an incentive to run AV with a pair of enemy Gunnlogis with missile turrets (which were not nerfed alongside the blaster and rail, but that's another thread) who are virtually invincible as long as they cover each other's asses.
 
 I don't know who perpetrates the rumor that Gunnlogis are inferior, but they're wrong in my opinion.
 | 
      
      
        |  Lorhak Gannarsein
 Legio DXIV
 
 3900
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.06.30 04:58:00 -
          [2] - Quote 
 They do, but it seems like it takes more shield damage to trigger the points than armour damage.
 
 So a Gunnlogi gives fewer points than a Madrugar.
 
 
 
 As for the rumour, it was pub scrubs being stomped by reppers. While we had hardeners and now that we have no rep tanks, Gunnlogi is back to being better.
 
 CCP Rattati Best Dev AmLogi 5 GÇó AmAss 5 GÇó AmSent 4 GÇó CalScout 5 CalLogi, you're next! | 
      
      
        |  Vitharr Foebane
 Terminal Courtesy
 
 1540
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.06.30 06:42:00 -
          [3] - Quote 
 My ADV breach forge gets the +75 and if i tag the weak spot gets a kill as well unless they've buffer tanked
 
 Amarr: Sentinel V Scout V Assault IV Commando IV Logistics IV I place my faith in my God, my Empress, and my Laz0r | 
      
      
        |  Bojo The Mighty
 Spaceman Drug Cartel-Uno
 
 3930
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.06.30 07:09:00 -
          [4] - Quote 
 I think the damage points only come in when you damage armor so you have to eat off all that shielding on Gunnlogis to get to the sweet core. Basically you have to kill a Gunnloggi to get the damage points for it. It's usually +95 Followed by the +180 for the kill.
 
 I'm not resting in peace but rather wandering as a zombie in vengeance of no good reason | 
      
      
        |  OP FOTM
 Commando Perkone
 Caldari State
 
 107
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.06.30 08:02:00 -
          [5] - Quote 
 No they're probably right. When I tried the Gunnlogis were hardened. I should check and see if it works when their hardener is off.
 
 CCP, I thought I was going to start liking you again. I really did. Then you announced this event. | 
      
      
        |  Tebu Gan
 Dem Durrty Boyz
 General Tso's Alliance
 
 1040
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.06.30 17:27:00 -
          [6] - Quote 
 
 OP FOTM wrote:No they're probably right. When I tried the Gunnlogis were hardened. I should check and see if it works when their hardener is off. 
 I'm almost positive that it does. I think you have to reach a certain damage threshold to get the points. I'm sure if you were using a plasma cannon, you would get those points as it gains a bonus to shield damage. And I want to say that when I used my own forge, I got points off sica's and gunnlogis that were not hardened.
 
 Tanks - Balancing Turrets | 
      
      
        |  KEROSIINI-TERO
 The Rainbow Effect
 
 1093
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.06.30 17:35:00 -
          [7] - Quote 
 Almost positive that only ARMOR damage triggers '+WP Vehicle Damage'.
 
 :-S | 
      
      
        |  THE-PIMP-NAMED-SLICKBACK
 Intrepidus XI
 EoN.
 
 173
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.06.30 20:06:00 -
          [8] - Quote 
 Damaging shield tanks does give you WP, you see it more on those 4000-5000 shield tanks. Try blasting a plasma cannon at their weak point that usually gets you the bonus points. Works quite frequently for me when I hit them with my adv PLC.
 
 Planetside 2 Eventually Eh | 
      
      
        |  Harpyja
 Legio DXIV
 
 1970
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.07.01 03:23:00 -
          [9] - Quote 
 
 OP FOTM wrote:I think this is pretty sad. I overlooked it until someone pointed it out to me, because I don't play the game to farm WP unless I'm using my Logi, and when I pull out my AV I'm trying to kill vehicles and that's my sole focus.
 But wasn't the whole point to reward AV users to encourage new players to skill into AV, and old players to pull it out when a vehicle starts messing their team up?
 
 That's not much of an incentive to run AV with a pair of enemy Gunnlogis with missile turrets (which were not nerfed alongside the blaster and rail, but that's another thread) who are virtually invincible as long as they cover each other's asses.
 
 I don't know who perpetrates the rumor that Gunnlogis are inferior, but they're wrong in my opinion.
 Missiles are fine. When was the last time you saw a tank fit a missile turret instead of a blaster turret for the sole purpose of killing infantry?
 
 Killing infantry with a missile turret is probably one of the most skillful things in this game...
 
 "By His light, and His will"- The Scriptures, 12:32 -- "Scouts should fart repeatedly while cloaked"- TechMechMeds | 
      
      
        |  OP FOTM
 Commando Perkone
 Caldari State
 
 132
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.07.01 04:04:00 -
          [10] - Quote 
 
 Harpyja wrote:Missiles are fine. When was the last time you saw a tank fit a missile turret instead of a blaster turret for the sole purpose of killing infantry?
 Killing infantry with a missile turret is probably one of the most skillful things in this game...
 
 Because all you need is ADV to instakill an enemy tank if you hit with every shot in the volley. It's unfair to Rail tanks now that they nerfed them, in my opinion.
 
 CCP, I thought I was going to start liking you again. I really did. Then you announced this event. | 
      
      
        |  Harpyja
 Legio DXIV
 
 1971
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.07.01 04:12:00 -
          [11] - Quote 
 
 OP FOTM wrote:Harpyja wrote:Missiles are fine. When was the last time you saw a tank fit a missile turret instead of a blaster turret for the sole purpose of killing infantry?
 Killing infantry with a missile turret is probably one of the most skillful things in this game...
 Because all you need is ADV to instakill an enemy tank if you hit with every shot in the volley. It's unfair to Rail tanks now that they nerfed them, in my opinion. Proper railgun Gunnlogis are still powerful. They are just balanced now because it's no longer an iWin button. If they play it smart I'm in big trouble, because even proto missiles don't do much to a Gunnlogi with an extender and a hardener.
 
 "By His light, and His will"- The Scriptures, 12:32 -- "Scouts should fart repeatedly while cloaked"- TechMechMeds | 
      
      
        |  OP FOTM
 Commando Perkone
 Caldari State
 
 133
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.07.01 04:19:00 -
          [12] - Quote 
 
 Harpyja wrote:OP FOTM wrote:Harpyja wrote:Missiles are fine. When was the last time you saw a tank fit a missile turret instead of a blaster turret for the sole purpose of killing infantry?
 Killing infantry with a missile turret is probably one of the most skillful things in this game...
 Because all you need is ADV to instakill an enemy tank if you hit with every shot in the volley. It's unfair to Rail tanks now that they nerfed them, in my opinion. Proper railgun Gunnlogis are still powerful. They are just balanced now because it's no longer an iWin button. If they play it smart I'm in big trouble, because even proto missiles don't do much to a Gunnlogi with an extender and a hardener. 
 You're wrong. I had a proto extender, proto hardener, proto rail and I was engaging at range. As long as they have a clear shot on you and have ATs hitting you with every single missile in the volley, you're dead even with the hardener.
 
 CCP, I thought I was going to start liking you again. I really did. Then you announced this event. | 
      
        |  |  | 
      
      
        | Pages: 1  :: [one page] |