| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
SCATTORSHOT RINNEGATE
A.P.E.X BRUTE FORCE
74
   |
Posted - 2014.06.17 08:08:00 -
[1] - Quote
This is probably what the players missed out, anyway here is my opinion.
Sica: 1300/750 SLOTS: 2 High 1 Low ISK: 67.645
Soma: 1250/2700 SLOTS: 1 High 2 Low ISK: 67.645
Gunnlogi: 2650/1500 SLOTS: 3 High 2 Low ISK: 129.762
Madrugar: 1250/4000 SLOTS: 2 High 3 Low ISK: 129.762
Falchion: 3000/1500 SLOTS: 4 High 3 Low ISK: 567,981
Vayu: 1250/4500 SLOTS: 3 High 4 Low ISK: 567,981
Sagaris: 3500/1500 SLOTS: 5 High 4 Low ISK: 1,234.980
Surya: 1250/5000 SLOTS: 4 High 5 Low ISK: 1,234.980
Chakram: 4000/1500 SLOTS: 5 High 5 Low ISK: 2,897,900
Kubera: 1250/5500 SLOTS: 5 Low 5 High ISK: 2,897,900
DROPSHIPS (Only the old)
Eryx: 2000/650 SLOTS: 4 High 3 Low ISK: 450,760
Prometheus: 650/2000 SLOTS: 4 Low 3 High ISK: 450,760
LAVS
Charybdis: 1800/650 SLOTS: 2 High 1 Low ISK: 112.780
Limbus: 650/1950 SLOTS: 2 Low 1 High ISK: 112.780
Scout LAVS must have something for their roles, yes they are fast but not invisible to scanners.
Rattati, don't do this for me, but for who want to play the tanker/pilot roles, please, we have dropsuit roles why don't give them vehicle variations too? im counting on you, i hope you read this also tell us if is viable for the server.
Waiting The Sagaris From Ages.
CCP: SoonTM
|
Godin Thekiller
The Corporate Raiders
2619
|
Posted - 2014.06.17 08:18:00 -
[2] - Quote
The Reverse CRU didn't work for the BO HAV's, the siege module never came into existance for the Marauders, there's no bloody point for the Enforcer, the LDS's were only given a bit more eHP and came pre fitted with a shite CRU and handled like a brick, and the LLV's although were good stat wise couldn't fit large r reps, as well as having a shite infantry rep on them, and the only one you want to keep out is the SLAV's until it's fixed? Bro, lol.
Also, to the prices, hell no.
click me
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
SCATTORSHOT RINNEGATE
A.P.E.X BRUTE FORCE
74
|
Posted - 2014.06.17 08:27:00 -
[3] - Quote
Bo was too overpriced around 2.980.641 ISK, the reason? is because it must be OP
Siege and cru mods can be always implemented if rattati wants to.
Scout LAVS were the less used cause of the PG/CPU Set up.
Also i want to see now what happens if old mods strikes back.
Waiting The Sagaris From Ages.
CCP: SoonTM
|
richiesutie 2
The Rainbow Effect
855
|
Posted - 2014.06.17 09:24:00 -
[4] - Quote
Dont forget remote rep mods!
compilation of Patch/build notes
Check it out! :)
|
DeathwindRising
ROGUE RELICS
361
|
Posted - 2014.06.17 09:43:00 -
[5] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:The Reverse CRU didn't work for the BO HAV's, the siege module never came into existance for the Marauders, there's no bloody point for the Enforcer, the LDS's were only given a bit more eHP and came pre fitted with a shite CRU and handled like a brick, and the LLV's although were good stat wise couldn't fit large r reps, as well as having a shite infantry rep on them, and the only one you want to keep out is the SLAV's until it's fixed? Bro, lol.
Also, to the prices, hell no.
to be fair... the shield LLAV was the only way to rep infantry shields |
Lorhak Gannarsein
Legio DXIV
3585
|
Posted - 2014.06.17 13:01:00 -
[6] - Quote
SCATTORSHOT RINNEGATE wrote:Bo was too overpriced around 2.980.641 ISK, the reason? is because it must be OP
Siege and cru mods can be always implemented if rattati wants to.
Scout LAVS were the less used cause of the PG/CPU Set up.
Also i want to see now what happens if old mods strikes back.
No.
They were less used because they were MLT LAVs with better acceleration and an 84k price tag. For that, you were better off speed-tanking an LLAV.
CCP Rattati Best Dev
AmLogi 5 GÇó AmAss 5 GÇó AmSent 4 GÇó CalScout 5
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |