DUST Search - Fittings that use precisely 100% of your fitting resources

All Channels

General Discussions

Fittings that use precisely 100% of your fitting resources

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Awry Barux Ametat Security Amarr Empire 1965	Posted - 2014.04.17 22:43:00 - [1] - Quote I love when this happens. The fit that inspired this post: With PG/CPU skills at 3 Scout Ck.0 BK-42 ACR M512-A SMG Flux grenade ARN-18 cloak X-3 quantum nanohive 4x complex shield extender Basic reactive plate Basic dampener Do you have any fittings that use exactly every ounce of your PG/CPU? Nerdier than thou
Shadowswipe Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 238	Posted - 2014.04.17 22:50:00 - [2] - Quote Ya, that is pretty sweet when it happens. I have many builds that use exactly all my PG... but usually overkill on CPU because Amarr just does that, or when I don't have enough CPU, a basic CPU upgrade over kills it by a lot.
Sourdough Muffins Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 178	Posted - 2014.04.17 22:52:00 - [3] - Quote Why bother with the damp when you are obviously going to be scanned passively by any other scout?
DozersMouse XIII Ultramarine Corp 453	Posted - 2014.04.17 22:54:00 - [4] - Quote lol at 4 complex shield extender on a caldari scout Bacon pancakes makin' bacon pancakes Take some bacon and I'll put it a pancake Bacon pancakes thats what it's gonna make
DozersMouse XIII Ultramarine Corp 453	Posted - 2014.04.17 22:55:00 - [5] - Quote Sourdough Muffins wrote: Why bother with the damp when you are obviously going to be scanned passively by any other scout? now laughing even harder Bacon pancakes makin' bacon pancakes Take some bacon and I'll put it a pancake Bacon pancakes thats what it's gonna make
Awry Barux Ametat Security Amarr Empire 1966	Posted - 2014.04.17 23:10:00 - [6] - Quote Sourdough Muffins wrote: Why bother with the damp when you are obviously going to be scanned passively by any other scout? Actually, the basic damp gets me under the precision non-precision-enhanced Cal Scout V cal scouts. That's important- it gives me a major advantage over truly bricked Cal scouts. DozersMouse XIII wrote: lol at 4 complex shield extender on a caldari scout It's not an anti-scout scout, it's a heavy killer. I fully accept that an EWAR scout is my hard counter. That's the price I pay for the superior anti-heavy and anti-medium capability. Get off your "real scout" high horse. Nerdier than thou
DozersMouse XIII Ultramarine Corp 456	Posted - 2014.04.17 23:13:00 - [7] - Quote Awry Barux wrote: Sourdough Muffins wrote: Why bother with the damp when you are obviously going to be scanned passively by any other scout? Actually, the basic damp gets me under the precision non-precision-enhanced Cal Scout V cal scouts. That's important- it gives me a major advantage over truly bricked Cal scouts. DozersMouse XIII wrote: lol at 4 complex shield extender on a caldari scout It's not an anti-scout scout, it's a heavy killer. I fully accept that an EWAR scout is my hard counter. That's the price I pay for the superior anti-heavy and anti-medium capability. Get off your "real scout" high horse. in reality if numbers are rounded up like most say your damp will do nothing Bacon pancakes makin' bacon pancakes Take some bacon and I'll put it a pancake Bacon pancakes thats what it's gonna make
DozersMouse XIII Ultramarine Corp 456	Posted - 2014.04.17 23:15:00 - [8] - Quote Awry Barux wrote: Sourdough Muffins wrote: Why bother with the damp when you are obviously going to be scanned passively by any other scout? Actually, the basic damp gets me under the precision non-precision-enhanced Cal Scout V cal scouts. That's important- it gives me a major advantage over truly bricked Cal scouts. DozersMouse XIII wrote: lol at 4 complex shield extender on a caldari scout It's not an anti-scout scout, it's a heavy killer. I fully accept that an EWAR scout is my hard counter. That's the price I pay for the superior anti-heavy and anti-medium capability. Get off your "real scout" high horse. p.s. I kill heavy's all the time with 249 ehp try re's Bacon pancakes makin' bacon pancakes Take some bacon and I'll put it a pancake Bacon pancakes thats what it's gonna make
Awry Barux Ametat Security Amarr Empire 1967	Posted - 2014.04.17 23:21:00 - [9] - Quote DozersMouse XIII wrote: Awry Barux wrote: Sourdough Muffins wrote: Why bother with the damp when you are obviously going to be scanned passively by any other scout? Actually, the basic damp gets me under the precision non-precision-enhanced Cal Scout V cal scouts. That's important- it gives me a major advantage over truly bricked Cal scouts. DozersMouse XIII wrote: lol at 4 complex shield extender on a caldari scout It's not an anti-scout scout, it's a heavy killer. I fully accept that an EWAR scout is my hard counter. That's the price I pay for the superior anti-heavy and anti-medium capability. Get off your "real scout" high horse. in reality if numbers are rounded up like most say your damp will do nothing Oh, are they rounded up? Has any real testing been done to confirm/deny this? I assumed that wasn't the case. Thanks for the info. As for your other post- I know you can kill heavies with less EHP, I also run a triple precision enhanced C/1 scout and kill heavies in that too, but that doesn't change the fact the more EHP makes it much easier, especially without REs. You can kill anything with anything, but easier is always better when you're trying to win. Easier = higher chance of cutting through several heavies in a row = more effective. Nerdier than thou
DozersMouse XIII Ultramarine Corp 456	Posted - 2014.04.17 23:27:00 - [10] - Quote Awry Barux wrote: DozersMouse XIII wrote: Awry Barux wrote: Sourdough Muffins wrote: Why bother with the damp when you are obviously going to be scanned passively by any other scout? Actually, the basic damp gets me under the precision non-precision-enhanced Cal Scout V cal scouts. That's important- it gives me a major advantage over truly bricked Cal scouts. DozersMouse XIII wrote: lol at 4 complex shield extender on a caldari scout It's not an anti-scout scout, it's a heavy killer. I fully accept that an EWAR scout is my hard counter. That's the price I pay for the superior anti-heavy and anti-medium capability. Get off your "real scout" high horse. in reality if numbers are rounded up like most say your damp will do nothing Oh, are they rounded up? Has any real testing been done to confirm/deny this? I assumed that wasn't the case. Thanks for the info. As for your other post- I know you can kill heavies with less EHP, I also run a triple precision enhanced C/1 scout and kill heavies in that too, but that doesn't change the fact the more EHP makes it much easier, especially without REs. You can kill anything with anything, but easier is always better when you're trying to win. Easier = higher chance of cutting through several heavies in a row = more effective. +1 to the triple precision cal scout I just laugh because the way its set up in the post is killing the suits best assets Bacon pancakes makin' bacon pancakes Take some bacon and I'll put it a pancake Bacon pancakes thats what it's gonna make

Joel II X Dah Gods O Bacon 2326	Posted - 2014.04.17 23:40:00 - [11] - Quote I used to, but then the scouts got a CPU and PG buff.
Awry Barux Ametat Security Amarr Empire 1971	Posted - 2014.04.17 23:41:00 - [12] - Quote DozersMouse XIII wrote: +1 to the triple precision cal scout I just laugh because the way its set up in the post is killing the suits best assets I completely disagree. I can see uncloaked and undampened non-Gal scouts, which I run into quite often, as well as cloaked logis (surprisingly common). Being able to see uncloaked scouts is often enough- I can see where they disappeared, and their facing when they disappeared, which is plenty to hunt them down through the cloak. The reality is that there's not actually that many scouts out there, for all that people scream that they're FOTM- I still see about 40% mediums, 40% heavies, 20% scouts on most teams. The real issue is that no amount of precision enhancers will allow me to see a cloaked and single-dampened Gal scout V shotgun scout, which is my nemesis- therefore tanking is all I can do, since this way I can generally survive one shotgun round, and it makes me do much better against the rest of the enemy team. Nerdier than thou
Joel II X Dah Gods O Bacon 2326	Posted - 2014.04.17 23:41:00 - [13] - Quote Awry Barux wrote: DozersMouse XIII wrote: Awry Barux wrote: Sourdough Muffins wrote: Why bother with the damp when you are obviously going to be scanned passively by any other scout? Actually, the basic damp gets me under the precision non-precision-enhanced Cal Scout V cal scouts. That's important- it gives me a major advantage over truly bricked Cal scouts. DozersMouse XIII wrote: lol at 4 complex shield extender on a caldari scout It's not an anti-scout scout, it's a heavy killer. I fully accept that an EWAR scout is my hard counter. That's the price I pay for the superior anti-heavy and anti-medium capability. Get off your "real scout" high horse. in reality if numbers are rounded up like most say your damp will do nothing Oh, are they rounded up? Has any real testing been done to confirm/deny this? I assumed that wasn't the case. Thanks for the info. As for your other post- I know you can kill heavies with less EHP, I also run a triple precision enhanced C/1 scout and kill heavies in that too, but that doesn't change the fact the more EHP makes it much easier, especially without REs. You can kill anything with anything, but easier is always better when you're trying to win. Easier = higher chance of cutting through several heavies in a row = more effective. Computers always round up decimals unless told otherwise. Knowing CCP and their lousy coding, I'm guessing this is the case. You've been enlightened.
Awry Barux Ametat Security Amarr Empire 1971	Posted - 2014.04.17 23:46:00 - [14] - Quote Joel II X wrote: Computers always round up decimals unless told otherwise. Knowing CCP and their lousy coding, I'm guessing this is the case. You've been enlightened. I'm about to graduate as a comp sci major, I know what they do unless told otherwise. I was assuming it was a float, not an int, since giving percentage bonuses to integers is just asking for annoying little bugs that are a pain in the ass to diagnose... but now that you mention it, yeah, I bet CCP was sloppy like that. Nerdier than thou
Joel II X Dah Gods O Bacon 2326	Posted - 2014.04.17 23:56:00 - [15] - Quote Awry Barux wrote: Joel II X wrote: Computers always round up decimals unless told otherwise. Knowing CCP and their lousy coding, I'm guessing this is the case. You've been enlightened. I'm about to graduate as a comp sci major, I know what they do unless told otherwise. I was assuming it was a float, not an int, since giving percentage bonuses to integers is just asking for annoying little bugs that are a pain in the ass to diagnose... but now that you mention it, yeah, I bet CCP was sloppy like that. Haha, nice! For percentages, I prefer to convert floats to ints at the last calculation, that way you don't end up with 1.538549840263 reload speed. What language did you practice, if you don't mind me asking?
Awry Barux Ametat Security Amarr Empire 1973	Posted - 2014.04.18 00:02:00 - [16] - Quote Joel II X wrote: Awry Barux wrote: Joel II X wrote: Computers always round up decimals unless told otherwise. Knowing CCP and their lousy coding, I'm guessing this is the case. You've been enlightened. I'm about to graduate as a comp sci major, I know what they do unless told otherwise. I was assuming it was a float, not an int, since giving percentage bonuses to integers is just asking for annoying little bugs that are a pain in the ass to diagnose... but now that you mention it, yeah, I bet CCP was sloppy like that. Haha, nice! For percentages, I prefer to convert floats to ints at the last calculation, that way you don't end up with 1.538549840263 reload speed. What language did you practice, if you don't mind me asking? I go to a liberal arts school, and the professors mostly have a boner for Scheme, a functional language created by MIT and really only used for teaching. Functional programming is cool, especially Haskell, but it's terribly impractical for the job market . I've taken classes in Java, C, Python, and Ruby/ROR, as well, though, and taught myself the basics of PHP. I know a little bit of everything and have mastered nothing- such is a liberal arts school... If I could do it all again, I'd go to a university and get a more practical education, but of course I say that now. Edit: Oh, also learned matlab and prolog. Nerdier than thou
Joel II X Dah Gods O Bacon 2326	Posted - 2014.04.18 00:07:00 - [17] - Quote Awry Barux wrote: Joel II X wrote: Awry Barux wrote: Joel II X wrote: Computers always round up decimals unless told otherwise. Knowing CCP and their lousy coding, I'm guessing this is the case. You've been enlightened. I'm about to graduate as a comp sci major, I know what they do unless told otherwise. I was assuming it was a float, not an int, since giving percentage bonuses to integers is just asking for annoying little bugs that are a pain in the ass to diagnose... but now that you mention it, yeah, I bet CCP was sloppy like that. Haha, nice! For percentages, I prefer to convert floats to ints at the last calculation, that way you don't end up with 1.538549840263 reload speed. What language did you practice, if you don't mind me asking? I go to a liberal arts school, and the professors mostly have a boner for Scheme, a functional language created by MIT and really only used for teaching. Functional programming is cool, especially Haskell, but it's terribly impractical for the job market . I've taken classes in Java, C, Python, and Ruby/ROR, as well, though, and taught myself the basics of PHP. I know a little bit of everything and have mastered nothing- such is a liberal arts school... If I could do it all again, I'd go to a university and get a more practical education, but of course I say that now. Nice! I'm just a freshman so I haven't started yet in my field, but I taught myself C++. I'll be learning Java and some other one that I forgot next year. Sorry for derailing your thread lol carry on o7
Harpyja Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1608	Posted - 2014.04.18 00:09:00 - [18] - Quote My Gunnlogi has only 1 free PG "By His light, and His will" - The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32
Awry Barux Ametat Security Amarr Empire 1973	Posted - 2014.04.18 00:17:00 - [19] - Quote Joel II X wrote: Awry Barux wrote: Joel II X wrote: Awry Barux wrote: Joel II X wrote: Computers always round up decimals unless told otherwise. Knowing CCP and their lousy coding, I'm guessing this is the case. You've been enlightened. I'm about to graduate as a comp sci major, I know what they do unless told otherwise. I was assuming it was a float, not an int, since giving percentage bonuses to integers is just asking for annoying little bugs that are a pain in the ass to diagnose... but now that you mention it, yeah, I bet CCP was sloppy like that. Haha, nice! For percentages, I prefer to convert floats to ints at the last calculation, that way you don't end up with 1.538549840263 reload speed. What language did you practice, if you don't mind me asking? I go to a liberal arts school, and the professors mostly have a boner for Scheme, a functional language created by MIT and really only used for teaching. Functional programming is cool, especially Haskell, but it's terribly impractical for the job market . I've taken classes in Java, C, Python, and Ruby/ROR, as well, though, and taught myself the basics of PHP. I know a little bit of everything and have mastered nothing- such is a liberal arts school... If I could do it all again, I'd go to a university and get a more practical education, but of course I say that now. Nice! I'm just a freshman so I haven't started yet in my field, but I taught myself C++. I'll be learning Java and some other one that I forgot next year. Sorry for derailing your thread lol carry on o7 Hey, no problem, it's not as though these forums are a paragon of useful and intelligent debate , might as well discuss whatever wherever. Comp sci is fun, stick with it! It's basically a scam- we've built up this idea in the general populace that "ooohh, scary computer, must call in the tech-priest to make it work", and now we're just cashing in on it. IT work is the sweetest- getting paid nearly $100 an hour to set up some idiot's desktop email client and install a printer = trololololo all the way to the bank. Nerdier than thou
Awry Barux Ametat Security Amarr Empire 1973	Posted - 2014.04.18 00:18:00 - [20] - Quote Harpyja wrote: My Gunnlogi has only 1 free PG I'll count it, rounds up to 100% Nerdier than thou



Pages: 1 :: [one page]