| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Motoko KitsunePilot
Freek Coalition
Freek Alliance
2
   |
Posted - 2014.04.15 21:55:00 -
[1] - Quote
Ok so maybe not everyone will agree with My idea's but I think there pretty good & I hope some people can appreciate them.
Gunboat
The Gunboat (I know sounds similar to Gunship) is a Heavy Air Vehicle that can carry up to 10 people, The Gunboat is no where as manoeuvrable a Dropship but more so then a ground HAV but with less armour then its ground counterpart, the Gunboat has Dual Medium Turrets on the front (Blaster, Rail or Missile) that can be manually Aimed by the Pilot, The Gunboat can also allow up to 6 people to Fire there own weapons from the side of the ship, the Gunboat can carry 1 Pilot & 9 Passengers, 3 on the right hand, 3 on the left side & 3 in the middle that can not be shot, The Gunboat is a slow moving Air Assault platform for large scale objective attacks.
Armoured Personnel Carrier or MAV
The MAV is a Medium Armour Vehicle designed for transporting people into & out of Hostile areas, the MAV is more armoured then a Dropship but being a ground vehicle it is not as manoeuvrable, the MAV can have 1 medium Turret on top that is controlled by a passenger, the MAV can carry up to 6 people, 1 Driver, 1 Turret Gunner & up to 4 passengers, the MAV is the heavy brother to the LAV and is great for pushing into enemy territory.
Fighter Bird
The Fighter Bird is a Light 1 person air vehicle, The Fighter Bird can be equipped with a Armour Damaging Gatling gun or a Shield Destroying Lazar cannon, the Fighter Bird is very lightly armoured & can take sufficient damage from Light arm's, the Fighter bird relies on its pure speed & manoeuvrability to swoop in helping Infantry pushes with its sheer anti Infantry power, with not much more Armour & Shield then an normal Infantry suit the Fighter Bird Truly relies on its speed to out class its enemies. |
Godin Thekiller
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
2009
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 22:08:00 -
[2] - Quote
1: Gunboat would be full of swarms and forges killing anything in the air or on the ground. No.
2: MAV from pics that I've seen looks to have a medium and small turret, so probably a medium for the pilot, a small for a gunner. There should be 6 passengers imo, as to carry a full squad, and still have a full crew, not just a move and despawn mobile.
3: lolwut? First off do you even get how our fitting system works? Secondly, it already has a name which is LAA. Thirdly, it would still survide even light arms, as ou know, vehicle resistance FTW (and it would have around the same eHP as a LAV).
So no to everything.
click me
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
Motoko KitsunePilot
Freek Coalition
Freek Alliance
2
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 22:46:00 -
[3] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:1: Gunboat would be full of swarms and forges killing anything in the air or on the ground. No.
2: MAV from pics that I've seen looks to have a medium and small turret, so probably a medium for the pilot, a small for a gunner. There should be 6 passengers imo, as to carry a full squad, and still have a full crew, not just a move and despawn mobile.
3: lolwut? First off do you even get how our fitting system works? Secondly, it already has a name which is LAA. Thirdly, it would still survide even light arms, as ou know, vehicle resistance FTW (and it would have around the same eHP as a LAV).
So no to everything.
1. the hole point in the gun boat is to create a platform for stuff like swarms & Forges, the idea is though its so slow it can also be taken down quite easy when it go's low for people to fire.
2. I think 2 guns would make it too OP, its better with 1 gun, not only is it more realistic to have just 1 top revolving turret but that way it relies on team work, ALSO it does carry an entire squad silly, its a 6 person vehicle, you dont see an LAV with more then 1 passenger spot do you ? so 4 is still 4x more then an LAV.
3. YES I know how the fitting system works & what about it ? =_=, as for already having a name well I'm afraid its my Idea I can call it what ever the bloody hell I want ty very much, if someone else has a similar idea then that's there idea not mine, no 2 ideas are identical, ALSO the idea is it wouldn't survive light arms silly or did you not read it ? my Idea my rules & if it got implemented then that could easily be something that's put in so your argument is null & void |
Godin Thekiller
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
2014
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 23:11:00 -
[4] - Quote
Motoko KitsunePilot wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:1: Gunboat would be full of swarms and forges killing anything in the air or on the ground. No.
2: MAV from pics that I've seen looks to have a medium and small turret, so probably a medium for the pilot, a small for a gunner. There should be 6 passengers imo, as to carry a full squad, and still have a full crew, not just a move and despawn mobile.
3: lolwut? First off do you even get how our fitting system works? Secondly, it already has a name which is LAA. Thirdly, it would still survide even light arms, as ou know, vehicle resistance FTW (and it would have around the same eHP as a LAV).
So no to everything. 1. the hole point in the gun boat is to create a platform for stuff like swarms & Forges, the idea is though its so slow it can also be taken down quite easy when it go's low for people to fire. 2. I think 2 guns would make it too OP, its better with 1 gun, not only is it more realistic to have just 1 top revolving turret but that way it relies on team work, ALSO it does carry an entire squad silly, its a 6 person vehicle, you dont see an LAV with more then 1 passenger spot do you ? so 4 is still 4x more then an LAV. 3. YES I know how the fitting system works & what about it ? =_=, as for already having a name well I'm afraid its my Idea I can call it what ever the bloody hell I want ty very much, if someone else has a similar idea then that's there idea not mine, no 2 ideas are identical, ALSO the idea is it wouldn't survive light arms silly or did you not read it ? my Idea my rules & if it got implemented then that could easily be something that's put in so your argument is null & void
1:the whole point of it is stupid. That's an extreme that would just cause unnecessary QQ.
2: a small turret on top of a medium is not OP. As for the seating, read it again silly 
3: You clearly don't, as you're trying to restrict something to only 2 turret types, which I assume is beam laser and autocannon. The name is by CCP, so your idea is moot. YOu can help shape their idea, but making something new that already exists is simply impossible and you are silly to think so. So not your idea, CCP's idea. You're an idiot if you think otherwise tbh........
click me
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
Nitrobeacon
Freek Coalition
Freek Alliance
257
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 00:44:00 -
[5] - Quote
I like the ideas, we definitely need MAVs, and it'd be great if we could also choose which person controls the turret. That way the pilot could also be the gunner, for solo gaming, whilst having the opportunity to let a squad mate control the gun in the case of squad play. |
Motoko KitsunePilot
Freek Coalition
Freek Alliance
4
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 02:16:00 -
[6] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:Motoko KitsunePilot wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:1: Gunboat would be full of swarms and forges killing anything in the air or on the ground. No.
2: MAV from pics that I've seen looks to have a medium and small turret, so probably a medium for the pilot, a small for a gunner. There should be 6 passengers imo, as to carry a full squad, and still have a full crew, not just a move and despawn mobile.
3: lolwut? First off do you even get how our fitting system works? Secondly, it already has a name which is LAA. Thirdly, it would still survide even light arms, as ou know, vehicle resistance FTW (and it would have around the same eHP as a LAV).
So no to everything. 1. the hole point in the gun boat is to create a platform for stuff like swarms & Forges, the idea is though its so slow it can also be taken down quite easy when it go's low for people to fire. 2. I think 2 guns would make it too OP, its better with 1 gun, not only is it more realistic to have just 1 top revolving turret but that way it relies on team work, ALSO it does carry an entire squad silly, its a 6 person vehicle, you dont see an LAV with more then 1 passenger spot do you ? so 4 is still 4x more then an LAV. 3. YES I know how the fitting system works & what about it ? =_=, as for already having a name well I'm afraid its my Idea I can call it what ever the bloody hell I want ty very much, if someone else has a similar idea then that's there idea not mine, no 2 ideas are identical, ALSO the idea is it wouldn't survive light arms silly or did you not read it ? my Idea my rules & if it got implemented then that could easily be something that's put in so your argument is null & void 1:the whole point of it is stupid. That's an extreme that would just cause unnecessary QQ. 2: a small turret on top of a medium is not OP. As for the seating, read it again silly 3: You clearly don't, as you're trying to restrict something to only 2 turret types, which I assume is beam laser and autocannon. The name is by CCP, so your idea is moot. YOu can help shape their idea, but making something new that already exists is simply impossible and you are silly to think so. So not your idea, CCP's idea. You're an idiot if you think otherwise tbh........
1. that's your personal opinion, you cant just pass the idea completely off cus it don't suit your personal agenda.
2. I did read it, you wanted a squad of 6 people as passengers but I just think that's a bit much for a "medium Vehicle" maybe a 7 person vehicle would be the most I would say & that would only be really if the turret was fully operated by the driver & then have 6 passengers like a standard dropship (but obviously with the use of a turret), as for making it OP yes I do think a small turret would make it op, have you seen the devastation a Proto Small Missile Turret can cause ? its pretty beast, you got to remember the Armoured personnel carrier is exactly that, its a personnel carrier not a Mini Tank.
3. I think you are seriously stupid, the Fighter Bird is NOT A FLYING LAV, in the ways of categories the Fighter Bird would be a "Extra Light Air Vehicle" not a "Light Armoured Air Vehicle", the point of the Fighter Bird would be that the thing has no armour its self, the Character would be in a Glass (or equivalent) Orb with a fuel cell & jets on the side with the weapon mounter on the bottom, the Vehicle would give the Pilot a Tiny boost of armour due to the shell there in but mainly the ship will only have the armour of the person who pilots it, the vehicle would only be able to be used by someone like a Light dropsuit (maybe Pilot Light suit) as any other drop suit would be classified as "too Heavy" for the Fighter Bird to lift, the weapon slot on the Fighter Bird would be classified as a drop suit H slot (aka Heavy slot) & the player would have to by the skills for these weapons to use them on there Fighter Bird, the Pilot suit could even be made with out a gun slot altogether or at most a Side Arm slot, so yer its not CCP's bloody Idea its my Idea so stop telling me how I can or can not think up an Idea. |
Lightning35 Delta514
Vendetta Reactionary Force
11
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 04:39:00 -
[7] - Quote
The mav would be cool, 2 turrets though, 7 people (1 driver 2 gunners 4 passengers) like a drop ship but on ground, make it faster then hav but slower than lav, 2 high and low slots 6 wheels, Amarr and minmatar, real nice |
Nitrobeacon
Freek Coalition
Freek Alliance
257
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 11:37:00 -
[8] - Quote
Confirmed future vehicles/stuff |
Motoko KitsunePilot
Freek Coalition
Freek Alliance
4
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 23:14:00 -
[9] - Quote
I do love the look of the Minmitar LAV, looks so much like an awesome dune buggy, as fr the Knifes it will be interesting what there gunna do to make them different as I wouldn't think CCP would just bring them out to be Ascetic differences, obviously they have done a great job in defining the rolls of all the different Pistols (although its too bad the Flaylock is so dang weak now). |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
1974
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 23:54:00 -
[10] - Quote
Godin, stop being an ass. Voice your opinion in a polite manner.
Like my ideas?
Pokey Dravon for CPM1
|
|
|
Harpyja
Molon Labe.
General Tso's Alliance
1603
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 00:00:00 -
[11] - Quote
Gimme that Amarr dropship and HAV already. Though I'd probably switch to the dropship as my main vehicle specialization at that point
"By His light, and His will"
- The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32
|
a brackers
Vanguardian Remnant
16
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 00:03:00 -
[12] - Quote
I'll add my thoughts for the air vehicles:
heavy: ccp have already shown rdv's are medium, meaning the heavy aircraft has to be stronger with more health. Given this would be op I suggest the rdv becomes a heavy aircraft on minimap, and also becomes the caldari heavy aircraft (as it looks like a caldari)
In place of the electromagnetic lifter there is a pilot controlled heavy turret. This has the same characteristics as a hav turret and as it is mounted on the bottom it can only hit any turret or tank which can hit it (it cant fire up at all and can only fire ~45-¦ down). There should also be two secondary small turrets, one on the top for protection against aerial threats (although it is like a tank's top turret and can't look very far up), and a second on the front just below where the pilot sits. It should have a similar amount of health to a tank so it is fairly even between tanks and heavy aircraft, however the tanks shots will knock the aim of the pilot off so the aircraft needs to catch the tank by surprise.
It should have a higher top speed than a tank but much slower acceleration (especially vertically). It should accelerate very quickly downwards and very slowly upwards. It should lose altitude very quickly if you tip it forwards or backwards to move. Basically it should feel underpowered and difficult to fly. It also has two weaknesses, fast moving targets and attack from above.
Light:
This should have a similar design to the f35 (type b). It should have two modes, changeable by x/Gûí (which ever currently opens doors in dropships). These two modes should be hover and forwards flight. It should also be on a cooldown timer so you can't change mode too often. Forwards flight requires a high speed to be maintained or it will stall.
It should have similar health to a milita lav when well fitted. It should have dual pilot operates light turrets which are locked facing forwards, even when hovering. This will be good for dive booming. It should also have a secondary light turret mounted on a pivot towards the rear, controlled be a person in the Gunner seat. This limits use for anti ground targets, unless it is on the ground landed, but it makes it an excellent choice for attacking air targets such as the heavy aircraft mentioned earlier.
I'm open to suggestions and really interested in these given I fly ads
Proto dropship pilot
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |