DUST Search - Question for Drop Ship Pilots .

All Channels

General Discussions

Question for Drop Ship Pilots .

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui The Containment Unit 537	Posted - 2014.04.12 00:21:00 - [1] - Quote I don't know if anyone has brought this up and it would surprise me if it hasn't but , wouldn't the Assault Drop Ships perform better if the slot layout's between the two were switched . Standard switches with Assault . Assault Drop Ships cost way more and just the slot layout alone gimps them . I think that both ships performance would increase . I can fit a lot better mod layout on my Standard's and it would just make since to maximize the potential , that it would have more slots then a Drop Ship that is basically used for some offence and troop transport being the main focal point , while the Assaults job ... is just that " ASSAULT " . I'm a part time pilot and it just seems kind of off about that whole thing but , just had to ask some " REAL " pilots that question . Stop asking for tiercide , your killing variety and the fun of this game at the same dam time .
Patrick57 6924	Posted - 2014.04.12 00:34:00 - [2] - Quote No, because then they'd be really OP. Hell is empty and all the devils are here. -William Shakespeare
VikingKong iBUN Third Rock From The Sun 54	Posted - 2014.04.12 00:40:00 - [3] - Quote Patrick57 wrote: No, because then they'd be really OP. cos they're OP now? say that to my breach forge gun.
Taurion Bruni D3ATH CARD 219	Posted - 2014.04.12 00:45:00 - [4] - Quote as a pilot, I have to say no. 3/1 is enough for me, don't know what I would do with an extra 2 slots (but I do) Pilot // Scout
Patrick57 6929	Posted - 2014.04.12 00:54:00 - [5] - Quote VikingKong iBUN wrote: Patrick57 wrote: No, because then they'd be really OP. cos they're OP now? say that to my breach forge gun. According to all the people who've never heard of a Railgun and a Sica, yes, they're OP. Hell is empty and all the devils are here. -William Shakespeare
MINA Longstrike 2Shitz 1Giggle United Brotherhood Alliance 475	Posted - 2014.04.12 00:55:00 - [6] - Quote I'm already pretty happy with my rail incubus with damage mod, I'd be happier if I could actually afford to take gallente ADS & regular ADS up to 5
Pvt Numnutz R 0 N 1 N 1088	Posted - 2014.04.12 01:13:00 - [7] - Quote They use to have the same slot layout but that changed when they removed logi vehicles, and they didn't drop the price. It would be nice to have the old slot layout but without upping the pg and CPU there wouldn't be much you could fit.
VikingKong iBUN Third Rock From The Sun 65	Posted - 2014.04.25 11:57:00 - [8] - Quote MINA Longstrike wrote: I'm already pretty happy with my rail incubus with damage mod, I'd be happier if I could actually afford to take gallente ADS & regular ADS up to 5 I have my Incubus at lvl 5 with a particle cannon, damage mods do not work. They add no damage and actually sometimes make me lose the RoF bonus from my incubus skill. Good job CCP.
Yoma Carrim Kinsho Swords Caldari State 448	Posted - 2014.04.25 12:06:00 - [9] - Quote VikingKong iBUN wrote: Patrick57 wrote: No, because then they'd be really OP. cos they're OP now? say that to my breach forge gun. Dear sir if you cannot knock an ADS out of the air with two shots from your Breach Forge Gun your aiming at the wrong part of the dropships. In other words ya do'in it wrong Aim for the venerable area between the two rear engines. Even if they hit their After Burner you should be able to lead them enough the put the second round on target (assuming of course you have enough practice to hit them when they move). Oh Heck Logi, Tanker, Heavy
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 3471	Posted - 2014.04.25 12:22:00 - [10] - Quote Having a 4/2 layout of the python with the increased agility would be boss It would give us a better variety of fittings also and and increased tank to boot Problem is dont expect it, infantry will cry OP

Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui The Containment Unit 636	Posted - 2014.04.25 12:27:00 - [11] - Quote VikingKong iBUN wrote: MINA Longstrike wrote: I'm already pretty happy with my rail incubus with damage mod, I'd be happier if I could actually afford to take gallente ADS & regular ADS up to 5 I have my Incubus at lvl 5 with a particle cannon, damage mods do not work. They add no damage and actually sometimes make me lose the RoF bonus from my incubus skill. Good job CCP. I'm working on that right now so this info is helpful . Thanks because I was wondering about that one . I would find it hard to use a damage mod on a Incubus seeing as they only have one high slot and I put burners on mine for the escape factor . To me it would help if the slot counts were switched . On both because the Python is kind of frail but you can say that somewhat about all Caldari vehicles . Stop asking for tiercide , your killing variety and the fun of this game at the same dam time .
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui The Containment Unit 636	Posted - 2014.04.25 12:28:00 - [12] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Having a 4/2 layout of the python with the increased agility would be boss It would give us a better variety of fittings also and and increased tank to boot Problem is dont expect it, infantry will cry OP That's why I asked and your right Takahiro . Stop asking for tiercide , your killing variety and the fun of this game at the same dam time .
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui The Containment Unit 636	Posted - 2014.04.25 12:31:00 - [13] - Quote It just seems to make since seeing as how you pay way more in ISK's and the fact that the skill set helps with the damage rate increase on the turret but the over all aircraft is kinda frail besides the damage factor . It takes a hell of a lot of SP's to increase the damage rate but I'm not complaining . Stop asking for tiercide , your killing variety and the fun of this game at the same dam time .
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui The Containment Unit 636	Posted - 2014.04.25 12:46:00 - [14] - Quote Pvt Numnutz wrote: They use to have the same slot layout but that changed when they removed logi vehicles, and they didn't drop the price. It would be nice to have the old slot layout but without upping the pg and CPU there wouldn't be much you could fit. I miss the logi vehicle's . They were strong and fun to use . I just couldn't get that spider to work on the LAV . I use to hate that . Stop asking for tiercide , your killing variety and the fun of this game at the same dam time .
buzzzzzzz killllllllll TRA1LBLAZERS 477	Posted - 2014.04.25 13:29:00 - [15] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Having a 4/2 layout of the python with the increased agility would be boss It would give us a better variety of fittings also and and increased tank to boot Problem is dont expect it, infantry will cry OP ads doesnt need a buff, just a massive price reduction. right now it is an unfair force multiplier, but it also is incredibly expensive, so there is some balance. however, if it got a buff, 1 ads would be greater force than a single infantry, therefore "OP". Dedicated heavy through the hard times, still supporter of A FULL 1.8 respec and MOAR HEAVY WEAPONS!


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.