DUST Search - WP rewards for vehicles - observations and oddities

All Channels

General Discussions

WP rewards for vehicles - observations and oddities

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Justicar Karnellia Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State 798	Posted - 2014.04.11 12:12:00 - [1] - Quote After the introduction of WP rewards for vehicle damage in 1.8 I have done some testing to come up with an explanation of how it works. First of all, the mechanic is a welcome addition to encourage those that felt chasing a HAV with a forge gun around a map was a thankless task post 1.7 (NB: It was). I also believe it could be modified to make it fairer and to avoid farming opportunities. The rewards,as far as can be ascertained are from battlefield conditions, keep in mind it's hell on earth working with forge guns at the moment trying to kill things. Feel free to add whatever your findings may be. Of course these war points exclude the +50 you would get for killing the pilot with his vehicle. HAV - Damage a HAV beyond it's shields - 75 WP Damage a HAV below 25% of its armor - 75 WP Destroy a HAV - 150 WP Dropship - Damage a Dropship almost to shield depletion - 75 WP Damage a Dropship almost to armor depletion - 75 WP Destroy a dropship - 75 WP LAV - Damage a LAV beyond its shields - 75 WP Destroy an LAV - 40 WP Now for the oddities: HAV's The war points aren't applied uniformly and I can't find an explanation for this. You can sometimes get a shield tanked HAV beyond its shields and receive no war points, at all. Yet, you get rid of the shields on an armor tanked HAV and you will receive +75. If anyone has a more precise explanation for this I'm open to it. Likewise if you somehow outright skip the 25% threshold and kill the HAV outright, you don't receive the +75 WP. LAV's Major issues with LAV's: - I don't think it's really fair that you receive more WP for DAMAGING an LAV than actually destroying it - If you place 2 x remote explosives on LAV's you can sometimes receive 2 x 75 WP for damage + the 40 WP for destroying it, for a total of 190 WP for destroying a parked LAV! I haven't experimented enough but it seems that if you place the remote explosives on opposite ends of the LAV, the 2 x damage reward is activated... if they are close together, you only receive the 75 WP for damage + 40 WP for destroying it. Either way, I think this should be reduced for LAV's to +25 WP for damaging it, and maybe upping the WP for destroy it to +50 WP. Again, LAV's can potentially be farmed as people still own BPO's of these, so I think reducing WP rewards to acceptable levels would prevent this kind of behaviour. Dropships - For dropships, same problem again, you get the same amount of WP for damaging it than you do for destroying it. You could adopt either the stance of increasing the WP rewards for destroying it - but not to the same level as HAV's or reduce the WP reward for damaging it. In my opinion Dropships are not as difficult to destroy as HAV's. Maybe a 100 WP reward for destruction and lowering the damage threshold to 50 WP might help this. I'm open to anyone's experience with the WP rewards for vehicles. You've probably noticed some oddities I haven't. Has anyone played around with flux grenades and received WP rewards for stripping shields?
Matoncito Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 4	Posted - 2014.04.11 12:59:00 - [2] - Quote Thanks for this... haven't ever registered any WP rewards for hitting vehicles with fluxes or for that matter locus grenades... but then they probably didn't do enough damage.
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 6585	Posted - 2014.04.11 13:40:00 - [3] - Quote If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Is this really gamebreaking? You can't farm the WP because of CCP's WP cap, and it allows AVers to place higher than 8th place. the 75WP is also neccesary due to the difficulty of killing Dropships and Fitted LAVs. #LivingLikeLarry [s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through -HAND
Justicar Karnellia Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State 799	Posted - 2014.04.11 13:56:00 - [4] - Quote Atiim wrote: If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Is this really gamebreaking? You can't farm the WP because of CCP's WP cap, and it allows AVers to place higher than 8th place. the 75WP is also neccesary due to the difficulty of killing Dropships and Fitted LAVs. Don't get me wrong, for me it isn't gamebreaking, and is a part of the solution for those poor souls who spend their matches lugging around forges (or those that are brave enough to try swarms) it could just be tweaked. The LAV is the odd man out - 75 war points just for damaging seems a tad high, while you're rewarded with a paltry 40 WP for destroying them - the effort required to damage an HAV is proportionally more and has the same reward. The WP rewards still don't apply consistently across armor/shield HAV's - have you had similar experiences? I think the algorithm isn't just "Do X damage then reward 75 WP" but it actually has to cross certain thresholds... like a percentage of shields or armor totals...
Supernus Gigas sNk Syndicate 738	Posted - 2014.04.11 14:47:00 - [5] - Quote Yesterday I was chasing down an LAV with my Forge Gun, I fired at it and then "Baloch Damage +150" Wasn't expecting that, but I ain't complaining. *FIRE UP THE HEAVY MEAT GRINDER! WE'RE HAVIN' CLONE BURGERS TONIGHT, BOYS!*
NAV HIV The Generals General Tso's Alliance 1423	Posted - 2014.04.11 15:04:00 - [6] - Quote More orbitals for tank squads and more WP and ISK for tanks


Pages: 1 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.

#LivingLikeLarry