| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Harpyja
Molon Labe.
General Tso's Alliance
1432
   |
Posted - 2014.03.29 20:35:00 -
[1] - Quote
With the nerf to the hardeners, blasters are getting close to what they were in 1.6, capable of slaughtering both infantry and vehicles.
Vehicle vs vehicle was almost balanced (aside from the large railgun), but the hardener nerf broke whatever possible balance there could've been with a proper railgun nerf.
Before, with my 60% resists, I could easily regen almost directly through the majority of a large blaster turret's DPS, allowing me to sit and reload one, two, and even three missile volleys (in the extreme cases) while that blaster tank shot at me. Now, my shield drops much more quickly and I barely have enough time to even get a second missile volley out.
If blasters are to be anti-infantry, they must have close to zero AV capabilities. But now their AV abilities have been dramatically increased and are close to 1.6 blaster Maddy levels where blaster Maddy > all.
CCP, I urge you to undo the hardener nerf and look at other ways to solve the infantry vs vehicle imbalance, because vehicle vs vehicle was NEARLY BALANCED with the only thing being OP was the large railgun.
Now, vehicle vs vehicle is thrown back into disarray, railguns are still OP and even more lethal now, and large blasters have seen an increased AV effectiveness as well while keeping their deadly anti-infantry abilities.
"By His light, and His will"
- The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32
|
Sir Snugglz
Red Star.
EoN.
566
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 20:37:00 -
[2] - Quote
Lol
-Pro AFKing LVL 5
-Luck is just one of my skills
-Just because I make flying look easy doesn't mean it is
|
Benjamin Ciscko
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
1972
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 20:38:00 -
[3] - Quote
I killed 2 of missiles tanks a rail with with my blaster the rail vs. blaster was the only even 1vs.1 though.
Team carry Prof. IV
I am a carried scrub!
|
Sir Snugglz
Red Star.
EoN.
570
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 20:39:00 -
[4] - Quote
Lol
-Pro AFKing LVL 5
-Luck is just one of my skills
-Just because I make flying look easy doesn't mean it is
|
Sir Snugglz
Red Star.
EoN.
570
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 20:40:00 -
[5] - Quote
WTF!!!!!! The forum wont let me post what I want to actually post and replaces it with lol
-Pro AFKing LVL 5
-Luck is just one of my skills
-Just because I make flying look easy doesn't mean it is
|
Benjamin Ciscko
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
1972
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 20:41:00 -
[6] - Quote
Rail damage/Missile damage mods are even more effective now what's your problem?
Team carry Prof. IV
I am a carried scrub!
|
Michael-J-Fox Richards
Molon Labe.
General Tso's Alliance
139
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 20:42:00 -
[7] - Quote
who cares if blaster tanks can kill other tanks more easily now? who gives a **** about that? how does that effect anything at all?
i fought in WW2, viet nam and in near future wars involving robots all in one lifetime just like MGS and COD characters!
|
k-con
151
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 20:44:00 -
[8] - Quote
.
The Asian Sensation from Red*
Accused of Driving While Asian
Bro, Do YoU eVeN cLoAk!?
|
Benjamin Ciscko
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
1972
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 20:46:00 -
[9] - Quote
Sir Snugglz wrote:WTF!!!!!! The forum wont let me post what I want to actually post and replaces it with lol
lol
Team carry Prof. IV
I am a carried scrub!
|
Harpyja
Molon Labe.
General Tso's Alliance
1432
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 20:46:00 -
[10] - Quote
Benjamin Ciscko wrote:Rail damage/Missile damage mods are even more effective now what's your problem?
My problem is that I still need more than one volley to take out most tanks, while I go down more easily. So I still need the same amount of time to pop them while they need less time to pop me.
And no I'm not fitting a damage amplifier as I'll get 2-3 shotted by a railgun now. I'm fitting for max EHP to give me the chance of surviving one more railgun shot and possibly escaping to safety.
My damage amplifier fit has become incredibly situational now.
"By His light, and His will"
- The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32
|
|
|
Zirzo Valcyn
Kameira Lodge
Amarr Empire
360
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 20:47:00 -
[11] - Quote
WELCOME TO TEST SERVER514
u can ban the troll out of the forums but u can't ban the forums out of the troll.
forum warrior .189
|
Harpyja
Molon Labe.
General Tso's Alliance
1432
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 20:48:00 -
[12] - Quote
Michael-J-Fox Richards wrote:who cares if blaster tanks can kill other tanks more easily now? who gives a **** about that? how does that effect anything at all?
Because blasters > infantry. And if blasters > tanks, then blasters > all. I don't think anyone wants to return to 1.6 where blaster Maddy > all.
"By His light, and His will"
- The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32
|
Benjamin Ciscko
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
1972
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 20:56:00 -
[13] - Quote
Harpyja wrote:Benjamin Ciscko wrote:Rail damage/Missile damage mods are even more effective now what's your problem? My problem is that I still need more than one volley to take out most tanks, while I go down more easily. So I still need the same amount of time to pop them while they need less time to pop me. And no I'm not fitting a damage amplifier as I'll get 2-3 shotted by a railgun now. I'm fitting for max EHP to give me the chance of surviving one more railgun shot and possibly escaping to safety. My damage amplifier fit has become incredibly situational now.
Well as a Primary rail gunner Go dual hard one DMG or Dual DMG one hard.
Team carry Prof. IV
I am a carried scrub!
|
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers
Negative-Feedback
2403
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 20:59:00 -
[14] - Quote
What blasters need is a nerf in power vs infantry, not vs tanks.
More spread and I think dropsuits should have a 33% resistance vs large blasters. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |