Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2d1e/e2d1e5e3c5e1d05fd7f02ddc0817a9f838e68f49" alt="TheD1CK TheD1CK"
TheD1CK
Dead Man's Game
993
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c933d/c933d60294680cd0c5b40b093ffcd43015ea5577" alt="View only posts by author View only posts by author" |
Posted - 2014.03.18 15:05:00 -
[1] - Quote
I've posted this before and I will try again, in the hope that CCP have the sense to fix this - Stacked Modules Speed Modules get invalid fitting when you stack them, which in the scheme of things If vehicles can stack Hardeners/Boosters/Reps why can't they also speed tank ??? They are the only vehicle module receiving a penalty to stacking, as you can't stack them Hardeners/Boosters/Reps/Extenders/Scanners all get away with no penalty....
For Infantry their is a worse shield delay for stacked shields, vehicles need something similar Along with Hardeners/Boosters needing a stacking penalty which could be any of the following
- Delays to Cooldown - Reduction in effectiveness - Reduction to active duration - Increase in Fitting cost of 2nd module of same type
Or someone else here may have a good idea ..... But any player with sense knows vehicles are damn close to being balanced CCP's changes have seemed OP but co-ordination can take any Vehicle out The Issue is only one Vehicle module suffers from a stacking penalty ......
A Dev response would be awesome, after months of adapting to AV We need to know if these Scrub 3 Hardener fittings will remain a viable option
'D1CK by name'
'D1CK by nature'
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc4b/1bc4b0f1988e1363ebab73904ca7a5a959721632" alt="Takahiro Kashuken Takahiro Kashuken"
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
3025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c933d/c933d60294680cd0c5b40b093ffcd43015ea5577" alt="View only posts by author View only posts by author" |
Posted - 2014.03.18 15:12:00 -
[2] - Quote
- Reduction in effectiveness
That already happens when 2 are on at the same time
Dont see how a 2nd mod would increase fitting costs or even make the active shorter and cooldown longer
Intelligence is OP
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc4b/1bc4b0f1988e1363ebab73904ca7a5a959721632" alt="Dauth Jenkins Dauth Jenkins"
Dauth Jenkins
Ultramarine Corp
251
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c933d/c933d60294680cd0c5b40b093ffcd43015ea5577" alt="View only posts by author View only posts by author" |
Posted - 2014.03.18 15:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:- Reduction in effectiveness
That already happens when 2 are on at the same time
Dont see how a 2nd mod would increase fitting costs or even make the active shorter and cooldown longer
Yea, also, some modules are absolutely integral to a vehicles survival, like the shield booster.
Sees prototompers...
Sees blueberries start to snipe...
Pulls out commando suit with laser rifle and swarm launcher...
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cdf6/8cdf6444262cf0ef008e4cd976fbbfef2f5b0806" alt="Spkr4theDead Spkr4theDead"
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1924
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c933d/c933d60294680cd0c5b40b093ffcd43015ea5577" alt="View only posts by author View only posts by author" |
Posted - 2014.03.18 19:20:00 -
[4] - Quote
Dauth Jenkins wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:- Reduction in effectiveness
That already happens when 2 are on at the same time
Dont see how a 2nd mod would increase fitting costs or even make the active shorter and cooldown longer
Yea, also, some modules are absolutely integral to a vehicles survival, like the shield booster. Depends on how you use it.
I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 :: [one page] |