DUST Search - Ambush and Ambush OMS should be splitted again.

The dark cloud wrote:

They are basically the same game mode but what i want is that the regular ambush should have the restriction of no vehicles allowed at all. It only has 50 clones to begin with and no supply depots etc. which makes it naturally harder to fight back vehicles. Please CCP do the community a favour and add this. We are sick and tired of tanks prancing around the field and no chance to fight back. Its a minor thing but with a huge impact. Tanking twatts would be banished to play with their kind in Ambush OMS and newbies/infantry players could finally enjoy themself again on the normal ambush.

Think of it like conflict escalation:

-Ambush: regular ground troops, no MCC (minor conflict)
-Ambush OMS: ground troops+all vehicles, no MCC (moderate conflict)
-Domination: ground troops+vehicles and MCC's trying to get controll over 1 objective (escalated conflict)
-Skirmish: ground troops+vehicles and MCC's trying to get controll over multiple objectives with eve support in PC/FW matches (full scaled war)

By doing that CCP is giving us the choice to fight against vehicles or not. For balancing reasons i would say increase the payout on Ambush OMS matches by like 20% compared to regular ambush.

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
The dark cloud The Rainbow Effect Negative-Feedback 2435	Posted - 2014.03.16 18:52:00 - [1] - Quote They are basically the same game mode but what i want is that the regular ambush should have the restriction of no vehicles allowed at all. It only has 50 clones to begin with and no supply depots etc. which makes it naturally harder to fight back vehicles. Please CCP do the community a favour and add this. We are sick and tired of tanks prancing around the field and no chance to fight back. Its a minor thing but with a huge impact. Tanking twatts would be banished to play with their kind in Ambush OMS and newbies/infantry players could finally enjoy themself again on the normal ambush. Think of it like conflict escalation: -Ambush: regular ground troops, no MCC (minor conflict) -Ambush OMS: ground troops+all vehicles, no MCC (moderate conflict) -Domination: ground troops+vehicles and MCC's trying to get controll over 1 objective (escalated conflict) -Skirmish: ground troops+vehicles and MCC's trying to get controll over multiple objectives with eve support in PC/FW matches (full scaled war) By doing that CCP is giving us the choice to fight against vehicles or not. For balancing reasons i would say increase the payout on Ambush OMS matches by like 20% compared to regular ambush. I shall show you a world, a world which you cant imagine, a world full off butthurt n00bs at the other end of my gun
Hynox Xitio Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 461	Posted - 2014.03.16 18:54:00 - [2] - Quote lolnotenoughplayers Unleash the Fogwoggler
Vinny Gar grief thief 3	Posted - 2014.03.16 18:58:00 - [3] - Quote I am 100% in favor of this. +1
SPESHULz The Southern Legion 32	Posted - 2014.03.16 19:02:00 - [4] - Quote Ambush was more fun when there was rarely any tanks in it... i have a pro tank character and they ruin it for infantry but tank battles can be more fun cause there is no red line. So i agree with your idea. Still want individual death match or 4 teams. Lord High Commander Maths is OP. It is all those numbers flying around that kills you. Forum Warrior lvl 0.02
COVERT SUBTERFUGE PSU GHOST SYNDICATE DARKSTAR ARMY 633	Posted - 2014.03.16 19:02:00 - [5] - Quote +1 Proud Minmatar scout - Republic Merc 6/10 Immune to bitter/jaded vet syndrome Roll with the punches instead of QQing
Aikuchi Tomaru Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 2007	Posted - 2014.03.16 19:08:00 - [6] - Quote No they shouldn't. They should leave it like this, throw Domination and Skirmish together and introduce Skirmish 1.0 again as a third mode. Sign up for Caldari FW and defeat the evil Gallente Overlords!
Nirwanda Vaughns Death Firm. 437	Posted - 2014.03.16 19:18:00 - [7] - Quote personally i wish ambush was infantry only and closer maps like before with a seperate vehicle focused mode similar to tank superiority in BF3. up the count to 8 vehicles either side and maps similar size to what we have in ambush now. that way dom and skirm stay same but if infantry want a break from vehicles we can and tanks have a place to go to test their mettle against other tankers Rolling with the punches
Defy Gravity Knights of Eternal Darkness League of Infamy 279	Posted - 2014.03.16 19:20:00 - [8] - Quote The dark cloud wrote: They are basically the same game mode but what i want is that the regular ambush should have the restriction of no vehicles allowed at all. It only has 50 clones to begin with and no supply depots etc. which makes it naturally harder to fight back vehicles. Please CCP do the community a favour and add this. We are sick and tired of tanks prancing around the field and no chance to fight back. Its a minor thing but with a huge impact. Tanking twatts would be banished to play with their kind in Ambush OMS and newbies/infantry players could finally enjoy themself again on the normal ambush. Think of it like conflict escalation: -Ambush: regular ground troops, no MCC (minor conflict) -Ambush OMS: ground troops+all vehicles, no MCC (moderate conflict) -Domination: ground troops+vehicles and MCC's trying to get controll over 1 objective (escalated conflict) -Skirmish: ground troops+vehicles and MCC's trying to get controll over multiple objectives with eve support in PC/FW matches (full scaled war) By doing that CCP is giving us the choice to fight against vehicles or not. For balancing reasons i would say increase the payout on Ambush OMS matches by like 20% compared to regular ambush. +1 Why are you reading my bio? Stalker......
A'Real Fury D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 601	Posted - 2014.03.16 19:25:00 - [9] - Quote Agree.
Meee One The dyst0pian Corporation Zero-Day 531	Posted - 2014.03.16 19:35:00 - [10] - Quote +1 The only people who disagree are vehicle users wanting to keep their i win button. I game over like a boss.

Vicious Minotaur Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic 722	Posted - 2014.03.16 19:44:00 - [11] - Quote Agreed, even though I seldom play ambush any more. I'll also add that in ambush, warbage/orbital strikes either need to be removed or made into EMP strikes. I feel that fits better with the "minor conflict" idea.
DeadlyAztec11 Ostrakon Agency Gallente Federation 4670	Posted - 2014.03.16 19:46:00 - [12] - Quote Ambush OMS was 100% better than regular Ambush. It lasted longer, had better maps, and Vehicles affected it less. I was really was when they merged it. Taco Cat backwards is still Taco Cat
Funkmaster Whale 0uter.Heaven 1515	Posted - 2014.03.16 19:49:00 - [13] - Quote I've been suggesting this for a while. But yes, something needs to be done about the ridiculous tank spam. Apparently making them easier to kill is not on the table , so get rid of them in Ambush. I only have about 700k in vehicle command and it's so stupid how hard it is to kill me. Any non-proto AV doesn't even stand a chance to kill me, and I'm not even a tanker. Tanks have it so stupid easy right now it's hilarious. Let me play you the song of my people!
Joel II X Dah Gods O Bacon 1691	Posted - 2014.03.16 20:00:00 - [14] - Quote There were no tanks back when they were separated. Maybe there were, but I surely didn't play with them. AV nades were Supreme back then, remember that.
Mad Syringe ReDust Inc. 198	Posted - 2014.03.16 20:57:00 - [15] - Quote I'd prefer if CCP would dump all ambush modes period! Divert recources to proper gamemodes that need more strategy than shoot the next reddot... This is supposed to be a tactic shooter. CODsters should go back to where they came from!


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page