| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Summ Dude
Direct Action Resources
290
   |
Posted - 2014.03.13 03:25:00 -
[1] - Quote
My most recent thread was locked almost immediately after it's creation by Logibro. You'll notice his given reason was that it was a "duplicate topic", and he subsequently linked the latest Dev Blog thread. You'll also notice the topic of my thread was asking the Devs what their reasoning behind not including Dropsuit Upgrades in the 1.8 respec was. Given all of this, I submit that logically, the Devs are now required to answer my question in the latest Dev Blog thread. Otherwise, my thread asking a specific question was in fact not a duplicate thread, and should therefore be unlocked.
Make sense?
Not just a laymen, but the laymen.
Winn Summ and lose Summ.
|
Auris Lionesse
Capital Acquisitions LLC
Renegade Alliance
414
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 03:26:00 -
[2] - Quote
Yes.
Inb4 lock |
Lanius Pulvis
Bullet Cluster
Legacy Rising
184
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 03:43:00 -
[3] - Quote
It seems to pass the sniff test.
Not new, just new to you.
|
Summ Dude
Direct Action Resources
290
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 03:45:00 -
[4] - Quote
Lanius Pulvis wrote:It seems to pass the sniff test.
That's all we can hope for. 
Not just a laymen, but the laymen.
Winn Summ and lose Summ.
|
Forever ETC
703rd
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
110
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 04:02:00 -
[5] - Quote
Locked for linking locked thread
Well, time to go Commando. Fill the Ranks at 703rd.
Love,Hate, and everything in between.- ETC 2013
ETC- My Initials!!
|
Summ Dude
Direct Action Resources
291
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 05:16:00 -
[6] - Quote
Forever ETC wrote:Locked for linking locked thread
Such charming alliteration.
Not just a laymen, but the laymen.
Winn Summ and lose Summ.
|
Magnus Amadeuss
Tal-Romon Legion
Amarr Empire
470
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 05:18:00 -
[7] - Quote
actually locked for discussing moderation ( a bit like naz- germany eh?)
While there is no better place to be wealthy than the Gallente Federation, there is no hell worse for the poor either.
|
Summ Dude
Direct Action Resources
291
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 05:21:00 -
[8] - Quote
Magnus Amadeuss wrote:actually locked for discussing moderation ( a bit like naz- germany eh?)
Hm, is this even technically a discussion of moderation? More like basic logic, in my opinion.
Not just a laymen, but the laymen.
Winn Summ and lose Summ.
|
Forever ETC
703rd
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
114
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 05:22:00 -
[9] - Quote
Summ Dude wrote:Forever ETC wrote:Locked for linking locked thread Such charming alliteration.
Thank you. My 6th grade L.A teacher taught me well.
Well, time to go Commando. Fill the Ranks at 703rd.
Love,Hate, and everything in between.- ETC 2013
ETC- My Initials!!
|
Ghosts Chance
Inf4m0us
1288
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 05:26:00 -
[10] - Quote
you also kept trying to ask this in IRC and KNEW before hand it would be locked...
wich is why it was locked.... |
|
|
IMMORTAL WAR HERO
NECROM0NGERS
108
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 05:29:00 -
[11] - Quote
Summ Dude wrote:My most recent thread was locked almost immediately after it's creation by Logibro. You'll notice his given reason was that it was a "duplicate topic", and he subsequently linked the latest Dev Blog thread. You'll also notice the topic of my thread was asking the Devs what their reasoning behind not including Dropsuit Upgrades in the 1.8 respec was. Given all of this, I submit that logically, the Devs are now required to answer my question in the latest Dev Blog thread. Otherwise, my thread asking a specific question was in fact not a duplicate thread, and should therefore be unlocked. Make sense?
Cp has the power to defy logic
Frowned upon by amateurs: The object of war is not to die for your country but make the other bastard die for his. GSP
|
IMMORTAL WAR HERO
NECROM0NGERS
108
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 05:31:00 -
[12] - Quote
Summ Dude wrote:My most recent thread was locked almost immediately after it's creation by Logibro. You'll notice his given reason was that it was a "duplicate topic", and he subsequently linked the latest Dev Blog thread. You'll also notice the topic of my thread was asking the Devs what their reasoning behind not including Dropsuit Upgrades in the 1.8 respec was. Given all of this, I submit that logically, the Devs are now required to answer my question in the latest Dev Blog thread. Otherwise, my thread asking a specific question was in fact not a duplicate thread, and should therefore be unlocked. Make sense?
I am the king of locked posts i feel yyour pain
Frowned upon by amateurs: The object of war is not to die for your country but make the other bastard die for his. GSP
|
Summ Dude
Direct Action Resources
291
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 05:42:00 -
[13] - Quote
Ghosts Chance wrote:you also kept trying to ask this in IRC and KNEW before hand it would be locked...
wich is why it was locked....
I'm sorry, how did I know it was going to be locked?
Not just a laymen, but the laymen.
Winn Summ and lose Summ.
|
Ghosts Chance
Inf4m0us
1288
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 05:44:00 -
[14] - Quote
Summ Dude wrote:Ghosts Chance wrote:you also kept trying to ask this in IRC and KNEW before hand it would be locked...
wich is why it was locked.... I'm sorry, how did I know it was going to be locked?
not my fault you diddnt see our warnings in IRC
|
Summ Dude
Direct Action Resources
291
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 06:06:00 -
[15] - Quote
Ghosts Chance wrote:Summ Dude wrote:Ghosts Chance wrote:you also kept trying to ask this in IRC and KNEW before hand it would be locked...
wich is why it was locked.... I'm sorry, how did I know it was going to be locked? not my fault you diddnt see our warnings in IRC
Your warnings? Don't see how that means I should've known my thread would be locked. Or how it in anyway diminishes the point I'm making.
Not just a laymen, but the laymen.
Winn Summ and lose Summ.
|
Ghosts Chance
Inf4m0us
1288
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 06:13:00 -
[16] - Quote
Summ Dude wrote:Ghosts Chance wrote:Summ Dude wrote:Ghosts Chance wrote:you also kept trying to ask this in IRC and KNEW before hand it would be locked...
wich is why it was locked.... I'm sorry, how did I know it was going to be locked? not my fault you diddnt see our warnings in IRC Your warnings? Don't see how that means I should've known my thread would be locked. Or how it in anyway diminishes the point I'm making.
well your point is that because you made the exact same thread as a crapton of other people and got redirected to the same place they did that means they HAVE to answer your question right?
well your question isnt getting answered... it isnt....
also we discussed it at length in IRC and we all awknowledged that this game monotizes SP, its how it makes its money and as such CCP wishs to minimise any SP refunds to those that are absolutly 100% nessesary.
the CPM made the case on behalf of the players and CCP awknowledged that it couldnt get away with not giving us back the dropsuit command skills, BUT since this games core is teh sale of SP they will not budge any further then that.
this conversation was going on the entire time you were constantly trying to ask your questions... you were just so hung up on reciving the answer you wanted that you diddnt take part in the actual conversation.
in short lockingbro locked your thread becuase you werent listening to the answers in IRC
when you ask a question, listen to the answer next time rather then continuing on spamming your question. |
Summ Dude
Direct Action Resources
291
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 06:45:00 -
[17] - Quote
Ghosts Chance wrote:Summ Dude wrote:Ghosts Chance wrote:Summ Dude wrote:Ghosts Chance wrote:you also kept trying to ask this in IRC and KNEW before hand it would be locked...
wich is why it was locked.... I'm sorry, how did I know it was going to be locked? not my fault you diddnt see our warnings in IRC Your warnings? Don't see how that means I should've known my thread would be locked. Or how it in anyway diminishes the point I'm making. well your point is that because you made the exact same thread as a crapton of other people and got redirected to the same place they did that means they HAVE to answer your question right? well your question isnt getting answered... it isnt.... also we discussed it at length in IRC and we all awknowledged that this game monotizes SP, its how it makes its money and as such CCP wishs to minimise any SP refunds to those that are absolutly 100% nessesary. the CPM made the case on behalf of the players and CCP awknowledged that it couldnt get away with not giving us back the dropsuit command skills, BUT since this games core is teh sale of SP they will not budge any further then that. this conversation was going on the entire time you were constantly trying to ask your questions... you were just so hung up on reciving the answer you wanted that you diddnt take part in the actual conversation. in short lockingbro locked your thread becuase you werent listening to the answers in IRC when you ask a question, listen to the answer next time rather then continuing on spamming your question.
No, my point is that I asked a specific question, and my thread was locked for apparently being a "duplicate" thread. Logically, this means that there must eventually be an answer to my specific question in that thread that Logibro linked. Otherwise, how was my thread a duplicate?
Not just a laymen, but the laymen.
Winn Summ and lose Summ.
|
Ghosts Chance
Inf4m0us
1289
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 06:50:00 -
[18] - Quote
Summ Dude wrote:
No, my point is that I asked a specific question, and my thread was locked for apparently being a "duplicate" thread. Logically, this means that there must eventually be an answer to my specific question in that thread that Logibro linked. Otherwise, how was my thread a duplicate?
well first of all, before your thread arrived i personally counted 4 other threads that were locked for asking the exact same damn thing.... all were sent the same link to their new home.
second of all before you even made that thread you asked in IRC and all of us there got you a damn answer, you just seemed to not have any interest in taking part in the conversation and wanted to spam the question more then you actually wanted the answer
so you were also a duplicate thread of yourself.
if you wanted an answer you should of payed attention when we got you it instead of being a spammhole. |
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution
10965
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 07:17:00 -
[19] - Quote
Make sense? Yes.
To CCP? No.
They'll probably interpret this thread as important instructions to nerf the plasma cannon.
You have long since made your choice. What you make now is a mistake.
|
Zeylon Rho
Subdreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
3817
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 07:27:00 -
[20] - Quote
"Duplicate thread" is a fancy way of saying "Put all your complaints here so I can ignore them easier." It doesn't mean they'll ever explain themselves.
Dren and Templar equipment stats, wrong since release.
|
|
|
Lorhak Gannarsein
Science For Death
2045
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 07:55:00 -
[21] - Quote
Woah this didn't get locked?
Sheesh, Logibro! You're off your game!!
Assault ak.0 w/ScR+ScP 4LYFE
Forum Warrior Level Two. (GëºGêçGëª)/
|
Summ Dude
Direct Action Resources
294
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 08:18:00 -
[22] - Quote
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote:Woah this didn't get locked?
Sheesh, Logibro! You're off your game!!
I wonder, does this thread actually break any forum rules? I'm not sure.
Not just a laymen, but the laymen.
Winn Summ and lose Summ.
|
|
CCP Logibro
C C P
C C P Alliance
6012
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 14:07:00 -
[23] - Quote
Locked for reopening a locked thread.
CCP Logibro // EVE Universe Community Team // Distributor of Nanites // Patron Saint of Logistics
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |