| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon
1781
   |
Posted - 2014.03.12 22:40:00 -
[1] - Quote
I agree, because i have a lot of friends and i want to play with them all together  .
Discuss
1.8 it's so secret that nobody know what will be in it, even after patch notes...
#SoloDoloreSuCharlie
|
Hellkeizer
The Avutora Complex
208
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 23:00:00 -
[2] - Quote
Why have 8 when you could have 12? Why have 12 when you could have 48, i think that's the highest number that could be on a team once CCP makes it so. But honestly this should happen in PC or FW more than pubs cause...well you know
Waiting on PvE
"Don't chu go disrespecting coconut water!" Chakra Attack
|
Rusty Shallows
1088
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 23:01:00 -
[3] - Quote
This takes me back to when we were limited to squads of four and the debates over Corp deployment.
Here, have some candy and a Like. :-)
Forums > Game
|
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon
1782
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 23:06:00 -
[4] - Quote
Hellkeizer wrote:Why have 8 when you could have 12? Why have 12 when you could have 48, i think that's the highest number that could be on a team once CCP makes it so. But honestly this should happen in PC or FW more than pubs cause...well you know
I know, but if you think about it a organized squad of 6 is already a pain in the ass.
Probably with squad of 8 it would be better, at least it will be easier to put a squad against another squad.
Right now in the best possible scenario it's:
6+6+4 vs 6+6+4
With squad of 8 the best best possible scenario is:
8+8 vs 8+8
It looks easier to me.
1.8 it's so secret that nobody know what will be in it, even after patch notes...
#SoloDoloreSuCharlie
|
Forever ETC
703rd
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
104
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 23:10:00 -
[5] - Quote
Or once we get 24vs24. 6+6+6+6 vs 6+6+6+6
Well, time to go Commando. Fill the Ranks at 703rd.
Love,Hate, and everything in between.- ETC 2013
ETC- My Initials!!
|
Ansiiis The Trustworthy
Mocking Bird Inc.
791
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 23:18:00 -
[6] - Quote
Because having 2 squads on the enemy team don't look scary enough...
Very disappointing feelings about no respec.
No SP for Magsec, no SP for the bolt pistol :(
|
Hellkeizer
The Avutora Complex
208
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 23:19:00 -
[7] - Quote
shaman oga wrote:Hellkeizer wrote:Why have 8 when you could have 12? Why have 12 when you could have 48, i think that's the highest number that could be on a team once CCP makes it so. But honestly this should happen in PC or FW more than pubs cause...well you know I know, but if you think about it a organized squad of 6 is already a pain in the ass. Probably with squad of 8 it would be better, at least it will be easier to put a squad against another squad. Right now in the best possible scenario it's: 6+6+4 vs 6+6+4 With squad of 8 the best best possible scenario is: 8+8 vs 8+8 It looks easier to me.
Yea I could see that working since the higher sp players would be against each other more and would make the lower sp players stop filling gaps
Waiting on PvE
"Don't chu go disrespecting coconut water!" Chakra Attack
|
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon
1784
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 06:48:00 -
[8] - Quote
Forever ETC wrote:Or once we get 24vs24. 6+6+6+6 vs 6+6+6+6
8*3 vs 8*3
looks easier, basically 8 suits with all the numbers (16,24,32)
Ansiiis The Trustworthy wrote:Because having 2 squads on the enemy team don't look scary enough...
Imagine 2 teams +4 other good players, but usually is 1 team against 2.
With 8+x vs 8+x you have more chance to play with randoms vs another team + random or 2 teams vs 2 teams.
If CCP will add a timer before starting a match (please do it) match probably would be more balanced.
1.8 it's so secret that nobody know what will be in it, even after patch notes...
#SoloDoloreSuCharlie
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |