| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
KA24DERT
TeamPlayers
Negative-Feedback
525
   |
Posted - 2014.03.10 02:58:00 -
[1] - Quote
Simple request. Empower us to select whether or not we want this option enabled. From the Unreal Engine manual:
Quote:OneFrameThreadLag
(UBOOL) Whether to allow the rendering thread to lag one frame behind the game thread.
I'd rather take a slight framerate hit than to deal with the current input lag, and that's the player's choice to make, not CCP's. |
ReGnYuM
Escrow Removal and Acquisition
2445
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 17:45:00 -
[2] - Quote
Bump!
Official Imperfect Title: Supreme Leader of the Endless Sunset
I Slay, for thy Empress
Do you even PC... Brah
|
THUNDERGROOVE
ZionTCD
548
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 19:13:00 -
[3] - Quote
I agree. We need more options when it comes to how the game runs. I would much rather take a huge hit to how good the game looks to prevent frame drops that are quite common and the input lag that occasionally accompanies it.
Amarr Logi | Amarr Sentinel
Projects: TDBS | SDETool
|
Interplanetary Insanitarium
293
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 22:54:00 -
[4] - Quote
But would it improve perceived connectivity or would people still lag out from things like equipment spam?
I really don't know.
If fists were food you'd be full right now.
|
KA24DERT
TeamPlayers
Negative-Feedback
528
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 04:45:00 -
[5] - Quote
Interplanetary Insanitarium wrote:But would it improve perceived connectivity or would people still lag out from things like equipment spam?
I really don't know.
From what I can gather the setting improves input latency since input is handled by the game thread. I don't think the equipment spam issue will be made much worse by this, but either way I'd rather lose 1 FPS and gain responsive input. |
Malkai Inos
Onikanabo Brigade
Caldari State
1204
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 04:57:00 -
[6] - Quote
KA24DERT wrote:Interplanetary Insanitarium wrote:But would it improve perceived connectivity or would people still lag out from things like equipment spam?
I really don't know.
From what I can gather the setting improves input latency since input is handled by the game thread. I don't think the equipment spam issue will be made much worse by this, but either way I'd rather lose 1 FPS and gain responsive input. What little i could gather about this suggests that the performance impact can be much more than 1 FPS.
I'd like a dev to test this internally beforehand.
You can take a benign object, -you can take a cheeseburger and deconstruct it to its source...
|
X7 lion
SWAMPERIUM
136
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 05:06:00 -
[7] - Quote
every technical issue for dust is caused by the fact its on ps3, the sooner its on ps4 the better, dont get me wrong i know porting dust would take time and isnt easy work going from the cell chip to 64bit but it needs to be done, so many technical issues and feature possibility get fixed/come into play at that point id rather sit out the update for 1.9 or 2.0 to get it on ps4
I am death incarnate, you will not see me or hear me.
You shall only feel the strike of my blade.
|
Malkai Inos
Onikanabo Brigade
Caldari State
1204
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 05:08:00 -
[8] - Quote
X7 lion wrote:every technical issue for dust is caused by the fact its on ps3, the sooner its on ps4 the better, dont get me wrong i know porting dust would take time and isnt easy work going from the cell chip to 64bit but it needs to be done, so many technical issues and feature possibility get fixed/come into play at that point id rather sit out the update for 1.9 or 2.0 to get it on ps4 A PS4 port will not come any time soon and is hardly the subject.
You can take a benign object, -you can take a cheeseburger and deconstruct it to its source...
|
X7 lion
SWAMPERIUM
137
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 06:51:00 -
[9] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:X7 lion wrote:every technical issue for dust is caused by the fact its on ps3, the sooner its on ps4 the better, dont get me wrong i know porting dust would take time and isnt easy work going from the cell chip to 64bit but it needs to be done, so many technical issues and feature possibility get fixed/come into play at that point id rather sit out the update for 1.9 or 2.0 to get it on ps4 A PS4 port will not come any time soon and is hardly the subject.
EVERY TECHNICAL issue is tied into the fact that it runs on a ps3, equipment spam and input lagg would not be as much of or simple a non issue on a more powerful system
I am death incarnate, you will not see me or hear me.
You shall only feel the strike of my blade.
|
KA24DERT
TeamPlayers
Negative-Feedback
529
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 16:00:00 -
[10] - Quote
X7 lion wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:X7 lion wrote:every technical issue for dust is caused by the fact its on ps3, the sooner its on ps4 the better, dont get me wrong i know porting dust would take time and isnt easy work going from the cell chip to 64bit but it needs to be done, so many technical issues and feature possibility get fixed/come into play at that point id rather sit out the update for 1.9 or 2.0 to get it on ps4 A PS4 port will not come any time soon and is hardly the subject. EVERY TECHNICAL issue is tied into the fact that it runs on a ps3, equipment spam and input lagg would not be as much of or simple a non issue on a more powerful system
That's a very broad, very wrong, and very off-topic statement. There's more to squeeze out of the PS3, and it's in everyone's best interest that CCP continues to make what performance improvements they can(especially platform agnostic improvements) before they port this game to another platform.
It's also in everyone's best interest to expose more controller related settings to the end user, of which I think this is one. |
Spyder Spyra
Kameira Lodge
Amarr Empire
8
|
Posted - 2014.03.13 21:57:00 -
[11] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:X7 lion wrote:every technical issue for dust is caused by the fact its on ps3, the sooner its on ps4 the better, dont get me wrong i know porting dust would take time and isnt easy work going from the cell chip to 64bit but it needs to be done, so many technical issues and feature possibility get fixed/come into play at that point id rather sit out the update for 1.9 or 2.0 to get it on ps4 A PS4 port will not come any time soon and is hardly the subject.
Needs to be a subject. |
FarQue FromAfar
Hellstorm Inc
League of Infamy
105
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 00:49:00 -
[12] - Quote
KA24DERT wrote:Simple request. Empower us to select whether or not we want this option enabled. From the Unreal Engine manual: Quote:OneFrameThreadLag
(UBOOL) Whether to allow the rendering thread to lag one frame behind the game thread. I'd rather take a slight framerate hit than to deal with the current input lag, and that's the player's choice to make, not CCP's.
Yes, I don't care if I see the little equipment bubble pulsing, just give a dotted line. Give us low- med- high- on things like friendly explosions, enemy, and textures/models. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |