DUST Search - Massive Multiple player Game my ass

Sam Tektzby wrote:

Burntface man112 wrote:

16 v 16 is large on the scale of pvp battles but not any where near massive. Get that **** off your qoute to promote your game because its a lie. Is massive multiplayer eventually going to come? yeah. But the more important thing to note that its not here and its totally give the players joining in the wrong information. Tell players the truth of your game, not the truth to be told 2 years from now or whatever.

Honesty can go along ways with its community, and fan feedback can make or break a game. If fans continue to say that CCP is honest about their work and they keep people well informed that you will get huge amount of support from your fans.

But placing Massive Multiplayer on your promotion and description of the game is misleading and should not be up there at all. Include that promotion when the game increases in player counts above Battlefield 4 player counts.

Yup boyo, if this is massive MAG with its 256 (128 vs 128) players on field should be HMO, humongous multiplayer online XD

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Burntface man112 Onikanabo Brigade Caldari State 128	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:12:00 - [1] - Quote 16 v 16 is large on the scale of pvp battles but not any where near massive. Get that **** off your qoute to promote your game because its a lie. Is massive multiplayer eventually going to come? yeah. But the more important thing to note that its not here and its totally give the players joining in the wrong information. Tell players the truth of your game, not the truth to be told 2 years from now or whatever. Honesty can go along ways with its community, and fan feedback can make or break a game. If fans continue to say that CCP is honest about their work and they keep people well informed that you will get huge amount of support from your fans. But placing Massive Multiplayer on your promotion and description of the game is misleading and should not be up there at all. Include that promotion when the game increases in player counts above Battlefield 4 player counts.
DootDoot Da Short Buss 209	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:14:00 - [2] - Quote CCP Market what they actually have? Not Hopes and Dreams? But how would you attract new customers? lol
Aero Yassavi Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 7287	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:19:00 - [3] - Quote The "MMO" part of Dust isn't describing the individual battles but the collection of battles in Faction Warfare and Planetary Conquest where there are several hundred if not thousands of districts to be fought over in a single shard universe with tens of thousands of active players. Still misleading because it's not what you are thinking when you read "MMO" but I wouldn't call it lying either. EDIT: And when I say tens of thousands, yes I know the number presented at the login screen is EVE and Dust combined, but it is also just the number of people currently online. The entire active player base is never online at the same time, so I'm just making a very safe and broad estimate. CPM1 Candidacy Thread
Patrick57 5837	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:19:00 - [4] - Quote Second! edit: Dammit third -_-
Burntface man112 Onikanabo Brigade Caldari State 128	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:20:00 - [5] - Quote DootDoot wrote: CCP Market what they actually have? Not Hopes and Dreams? But how would you attract new customers? lol Simple, Market in game content. The amount of Customization, Corporations, In game communication, Eve and Dust link, basically every function in the game. That kind of promotional information is really honest and good for players, but more importantly hopes and future ideas should only be introduced in Fanfest this way players are not getting information too prematurely and risk being disappointed with the amount of time it takes to get the products. It simply boils down to one thing, if you tell people especially customers that something is in the game but turns out that is not in the game at all... Well the consumer is going to tell everyone around him that it lies about it product description. Marketing should be about honesty because if a player base finds out that its not in game at all than players feel betrayed. Look at the example of Alien Colonial Marines, or Battlefield 4 with several lawsuits, or even the lower unknown games as well.
Burntface man112 Onikanabo Brigade Caldari State 128	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:21:00 - [6] - Quote Aero Yassavi wrote: The "MMO" part of Dust isn't describing the individual battles but the collection of battles in Faction Warfare and Planetary Conquest where there are several hundred if not thousands of districts to be fought over in a single shard universe with tens of thousands of active players. Still misleading because it's not what you are thinking when you read "MMO" but I wouldn't call it lying either. Well thats a point but it is easily misinterpreted, which I believe many consumers should find that just as shady.
Burntface man112 Onikanabo Brigade Caldari State 128	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:24:00 - [7] - Quote Burntface man112 wrote: Aero Yassavi wrote: The "MMO" part of Dust isn't describing the individual battles but the collection of battles in Faction Warfare and Planetary Conquest where there are several hundred if not thousands of districts to be fought over in a single shard universe with tens of thousands of active players. Still misleading because it's not what you are thinking when you read "MMO" but I wouldn't call it lying either. Well thats a point but it is easily misinterpreted, which I believe many consumers should find that just as shady. More importantly if you look at the official website part of Dust514.com the describing portion of Dust 514 is labeled "Massive Multiplayer Shooter". MMO is not the term used, which again is misleading and in many ways just as much of discreditable as lying.
Proto Annihilator Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire 23	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:28:00 - [8] - Quote Don't forget half of the game is played on the forums. That makes it massive enough for me.
Sam Tektzby Better Hide R Die 309	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:29:00 - [9] - Quote Burntface man112 wrote: 16 v 16 is large on the scale of pvp battles but not any where near massive. Get that **** off your qoute to promote your game because its a lie. Is massive multiplayer eventually going to come? yeah. But the more important thing to note that its not here and its totally give the players joining in the wrong information. Tell players the truth of your game, not the truth to be told 2 years from now or whatever. Honesty can go along ways with its community, and fan feedback can make or break a game. If fans continue to say that CCP is honest about their work and they keep people well informed that you will get huge amount of support from your fans. But placing Massive Multiplayer on your promotion and description of the game is misleading and should not be up there at all. Include that promotion when the game increases in player counts above Battlefield 4 player counts. Yup boyo, if this is massive MAG with its 256 (128 vs 128) players on field should be HMO, humongous multiplayer online XD Support - Tactician/Support Deteis - Orator BHD since MAG
Burntface man112 Onikanabo Brigade Caldari State 129	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:29:00 - [10] - Quote Proto Annihilator wrote: Don't forget half of the game is played on the forums. That makes it massive enough for me. lol, yeah but than it would be called massive multiplayer posting... lol not massive multiplayer shooter.

Burntface man112 Onikanabo Brigade Caldari State 129	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:31:00 - [11] - Quote Sam Tektzby wrote: Burntface man112 wrote: 16 v 16 is large on the scale of pvp battles but not any where near massive. Get that **** off your qoute to promote your game because its a lie. Is massive multiplayer eventually going to come? yeah. But the more important thing to note that its not here and its totally give the players joining in the wrong information. Tell players the truth of your game, not the truth to be told 2 years from now or whatever. Honesty can go along ways with its community, and fan feedback can make or break a game. If fans continue to say that CCP is honest about their work and they keep people well informed that you will get huge amount of support from your fans. But placing Massive Multiplayer on your promotion and description of the game is misleading and should not be up there at all. Include that promotion when the game increases in player counts above Battlefield 4 player counts. Yup boyo, if this is massive MAG with its 256 (128 vs 128) players on field should be HMO, humongous multiplayer online XD lol
The dark cloud The Rainbow Effect Negative-Feedback 2336	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:49:00 - [12] - Quote MAG was the only true game that had massive palyercounts in regards of a FPS. I shall show you a world, a world which you cant imagine, a world full off butthurt n00bs at the other end of my gun
darkiller240 WarRavens League of Infamy 534	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:50:00 - [13] - Quote its describing whats coming SOON tm "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." - Albert Einstein
Sam Tektzby Better Hide R Die 309	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:57:00 - [14] - Quote darkiller240 wrote: its describing whats coming SOON tm You mean The Destiny?! XD Support - Tactician/Support Deteis - Orator BHD since MAG
Scheherazade VII 313	Posted - 2014.03.08 18:57:00 - [15] - Quote Planetside 2 is the closest thing I've played to large-scale-interplanetary-conquest-and-warfare, let's just hope they lessen the grind for PS4.


Pages: 1 :: [one page]