| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
5406
   |
Posted - 2014.03.07 21:53:00 -
[1] - Quote
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=146326 CCP Logibro wrote:Hey guys
With the Rubicon 1.3 release on 2014-03-11 we are aiming to deploy two changes, one to Planetary Conquest and one to Factional Warfare. At this stage we're waiting for QA to confirm both changes are good to go, but we have announced it earlier to give corporations in Planetary Conquest a chance to be aware of the changes.
Planetary Conquest: Locking a district will now ensure the attacker loses clones and ISK when there is no battle result
This means that if no battle takes place, or if a battle is reverted due to it not being completed, the attackers will lose clones as per a normal loss.
Factional Warfare: Adjusted the battle spawning so that factions will need to spend more time defending their districts proportionally to the number of districts they control
What this means is that as a faction controls a higher percentage of districts in the warzone, it will generate more defense contracts for that faction. It is being fixed, now quit with the childish tantrums.
Sorry to steal your thunder KAGEHOSHI, but I figured that this was information that not everyone knows, so I figured I should just put this out there.
-HAND
lolPLC
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
ads alt
DROID EXILES
General Tso's Alliance
95
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 21:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
Atiim wrote:KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=146326 CCP Logibro wrote:Hey guys
With the Rubicon 1.3 release on 2014-03-11 we are aiming to deploy two changes, one to Planetary Conquest and one to Factional Warfare. At this stage we're waiting for QA to confirm both changes are good to go, but we have announced it earlier to give corporations in Planetary Conquest a chance to be aware of the changes.
Planetary Conquest: Locking a district will now ensure the attacker loses clones and ISK when there is no battle result
This means that if no battle takes place, or if a battle is reverted due to it not being completed, the attackers will lose clones as per a normal loss.
Factional Warfare: Adjusted the battle spawning so that factions will need to spend more time defending their districts proportionally to the number of districts they control
What this means is that as a faction controls a higher percentage of districts in the warzone, it will generate more defense contracts for that faction. It is being fixed, now quit with the childish tantrums. Sorry to steal your thunder KAGEHOSHI, but I figured that this was information that not everyone knows, so I figured I should just put this out there. -HAND
Your late to the party
If you expect patch notes soon, you're gunna have a bad time
|
Patrick57
5824
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 21:56:00 -
[3] - Quote
Very late.
The party may as well be over. |
Outlaw OneZero
Subdreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
1191
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 21:56:00 -
[4] - Quote
Fixed, I do not think that word means what CCP thinks it means. |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
5406
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 21:58:00 -
[5] - Quote
Patrick57 wrote:Very late.
The party may as well be over.
How late?
I swear, everytime I go on the forums everything's already finished.
FML.
lolPLC
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
7984
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 21:59:00 -
[6] - Quote
Finally glad to see something many FW advocates discussed with CCP in September-Novemeber last year being taken on board.
We could still do with FW lock timers though, each FW should be able to handle the locks from 30-60 min.
"War is not hell, far from it. War is beautiful. War is divine."
- Grand Admiral Mekioth Sarum
|
Patrick57
5824
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 21:59:00 -
[7] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Patrick57 wrote:Very late.
The party may as well be over. How late? I swear, everytime I go on the forums everything's already finished. FML.
Don't feel bad, I just got here because my interwebz is broken.  |
ads alt
DROID EXILES
General Tso's Alliance
97
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 22:01:00 -
[8] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Patrick57 wrote:Very late.
The party may as well be over. How late? I swear, everytime I go on the forums everything's already finished. FML.
And the matches that end RIGHT when you load
If you expect patch notes soon, you're gunna have a bad time
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
5407
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 22:02:00 -
[9] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Finally glad to see something many FW advocates discussed with CCP in September-Novemeber last year being taken on board.
We could still do with FW lock timers though, each FW should be able to handle the locks from 30-60 min.
I'd like to see that implemented.
I just hope that they don't decide to use 24hr timers, because then one faction could have 100% sovereignty (if they tried hard enough), and the other faction wouldn't be able to hold a defense or counterattack.
lolPLC
[s]Text[/s] <-------- That's how you make a strike-through
-HAND
|
Kaughst
Nyain San
Renegade Alliance
239
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 22:06:00 -
[10] - Quote
never forget 3/11....
"That is not how you say my name."
"How do you say your name?"
"I don't know but that is not how you say it."
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |