Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Rinzler XVIII
Edimmu Warfighters Gallente Federation
195
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 21:16:00 -
[1] - Quote
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1911614#post1911614
If the CPMs really had been fighting for District locking being fixed .. why has it taken 6 months to finally do something about it then ?
You are basically saying that CCP are incompetent and even after constantly being told that it needs fixing you chose to do nothing about it anyway ... so either they didn't fight for it or you didn't listen which one is it then ?
Every player post is rumor mongering because YOU DON'T GIVE US ANY DAMN INFORMATION ..
Is this why you aren't doing anything to fix vehicles and AV balance aside from nerfing AV and Flux grenades in 1.8 as well ?
After the Dev v player event and everyone spamming Tanks you'd have thought that it'd be clear how broken the balance is but I guess even seeing the problem isn;t enough for you to actually fix something ...
Locking a thread for rumor mongering ... every single Dev Blog/Post is rumor mongering .. in fact isn't Soon TM the definition of rumor mongering ?
We plan to fix xxxxxx Soon TM .... you should go and lock pretty much every DEV thread if thats the case
Useless, useless, useless ...
|
Delta 749
Kestrel Reconnaissance
2618
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 21:17:00 -
[2] - Quote
I see you want to reserve a seat on the ban bus Not that you are wrong though
I'll start my own war, with hookers, and blackjack!
In fact forget the war and the blackjack.
|
BL4CKST4R
WarRavens League of Infamy
1992
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 21:19:00 -
[3] - Quote
In b4 you get a dev response. I guess I am safe :)
For the Federation!
|
Billi Gene
499
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 21:22:00 -
[4] - Quote
when you plan on building a house....it is not uncommon to to look ahead at the final product, its furnishings and finish.
there is no point putting that $600 hand basin into the main ensuite if you haven't done the tiling yet, or that fancy set of lights in the entertainment room if the electrician hasnt installed wiring.
Pedant, Ape, Troll.
My Beard makes Alpha's sook :P
|
Rinzler XVIII
Edimmu Warfighters Gallente Federation
198
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 21:23:00 -
[5] - Quote
BL4CKST4R wrote:In b4 you get a dev response. I guess I am safe :)
I don't expect a response but he will read it and thats all I intended |
Rinzler XVIII
Edimmu Warfighters Gallente Federation
198
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 21:24:00 -
[6] - Quote
Billi Gene wrote:when you plan on building a house....it is not uncommon to to look ahead at the final product, its furnishings and finish.
there is no point putting that $600 hand basin into the main ensuite if you haven't done the tiling yet, or that fancy set of lights in the entertainment room if the electrician hasnt installed wiring.
If you were building a house you wouldn't rent it out before the roof was on though would you ..
Analogy is irrelevant |
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Dominion of the Supreme Emperor God-King KAGEHOSHI
9839
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 21:26:00 -
[7] - Quote
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=146326
CCP Logibro wrote:Hey guys
With the Rubicon 1.3 release on 2014-03-11 we are aiming to deploy two changes, one to Planetary Conquest and one to Factional Warfare. At this stage we're waiting for QA to confirm both changes are good to go, but we have announced it earlier to give corporations in Planetary Conquest a chance to be aware of the changes.
Planetary Conquest: Locking a district will now ensure the attacker loses clones and ISK when there is no battle result
This means that if no battle takes place, or if a battle is reverted due to it not being completed, the attackers will lose clones as per a normal loss.
Factional Warfare: Adjusted the battle spawning so that factions will need to spend more time defending their districts proportionally to the number of districts they control
What this means is that as a faction controls a higher percentage of districts in the warzone, it will generate more defense contracts for that faction.
It is being fixed, now quit with the childish tantrums.
Gû¦Gû+Supreme emperor god-kingpÇÉKAGEH¦PSHIpÇæ// Lord of threads // Forum alt Gû¦Gû+
|
Rinzler XVIII
Edimmu Warfighters Gallente Federation
198
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 21:31:00 -
[8] - Quote
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=146326 CCP Logibro wrote:Hey guys
With the Rubicon 1.3 release on 2014-03-11 we are aiming to deploy two changes, one to Planetary Conquest and one to Factional Warfare. At this stage we're waiting for QA to confirm both changes are good to go, but we have announced it earlier to give corporations in Planetary Conquest a chance to be aware of the changes.
Planetary Conquest: Locking a district will now ensure the attacker loses clones and ISK when there is no battle result
This means that if no battle takes place, or if a battle is reverted due to it not being completed, the attackers will lose clones as per a normal loss.
Factional Warfare: Adjusted the battle spawning so that factions will need to spend more time defending their districts proportionally to the number of districts they control
What this means is that as a faction controls a higher percentage of districts in the warzone, it will generate more defense contracts for that faction. It is being fixed, now quit with the childish tantrums.
Sorry but taking 6 months to fix something after constantly being told about it simply IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH
Imagine if my washing machine was broken and I called a plumber out to fix it and he then proceeded to take 6 months to fix it even though I called him everyday to tell him it was broken .. do you think I should then be happy when he finally gets round to fix it after having to spend 6 months with the broken washing machine ? No .. hell No ..
Quit pandering to CCP it's far more childish ... |
Leadfoot10
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
696
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 21:37:00 -
[9] - Quote
It's been nice to have read your posts...I guess. |
ReGnYuM
Escrow Removal and Acquisition
2436
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 21:44:00 -
[10] - Quote
INB4LOCKandBAN
Remember not to mess with Kain or ERA, especially on the forums.
Official Imperfect Title: Supreme Leader of the Endless Sunset
I Slay, for thy Empress
Do you even PC... Brah
|
|
Marc Rime
303
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 21:46:00 -
[11] - Quote
It's hardly news that CCP Shanghai can't deliver things at the pace we want them (or even what they seem to have planned themselves). Maybe they can't find enough skilled people willing to relocate to Shanghai, or maybe they have organisational issues... or... anything (whatever the reason, companies tend to keep that kind of stuff to themselves so we'll never know). |
Rynoceros
Rise Of Old Dudes
3040
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 21:55:00 -
[12] - Quote
Same goes for Matchmaking, an even older known problem, and they're still acting like they haven't a clue what to do about it. (Collective Meta Tiering, ftw.)
I GÖú Kittens.
|
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Dominion of the Supreme Emperor God-King KAGEHOSHI
9839
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 22:07:00 -
[13] - Quote
Rinzler XVIII wrote:KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=146326 CCP Logibro wrote:Hey guys
With the Rubicon 1.3 release on 2014-03-11 we are aiming to deploy two changes, one to Planetary Conquest and one to Factional Warfare. At this stage we're waiting for QA to confirm both changes are good to go, but we have announced it earlier to give corporations in Planetary Conquest a chance to be aware of the changes.
Planetary Conquest: Locking a district will now ensure the attacker loses clones and ISK when there is no battle result
This means that if no battle takes place, or if a battle is reverted due to it not being completed, the attackers will lose clones as per a normal loss.
Factional Warfare: Adjusted the battle spawning so that factions will need to spend more time defending their districts proportionally to the number of districts they control
What this means is that as a faction controls a higher percentage of districts in the warzone, it will generate more defense contracts for that faction. It is being fixed, now quit with the childish tantrums. Sorry but taking 6 months to fix something after constantly being told about it simply IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH Imagine if my washing machine was broken and I called a plumber out to fix it and he then proceeded to take 6 months to fix it even though I called him everyday to tell him it was broken .. do you think I should then be happy when he finally gets round to fix it after having to spend 6 months with the broken washing machine ? No .. hell No .. Quit pandering to CCP it's far more childish ... You need to look up the definition of words like "pandering" before using them in a sentence, otherwise it makes you sound like an idiot. Yes it took a long time to fix, but what good is complaining it now when about if its about to be fixed in 4 days? You aren't helping anything, you're just raging, so yes you are being childish.
As for other things in your OP: There is a difference between choosing to do nothing about a problem, and not being able to until other priorities are dealt with (PC only effects a small percentage of players, so not a big priority compared to new dropsuits and weapons).
They do give us information. They gave us info on a variety of subjects including new weapons, new dropsuits, bonus changes, the rifle nerfs, MD buff, laser rifle buff, and a lot more. Saying they don't share any info at all is just plain lying.
When something is "SOON tm" its not a rumor, because it is something he devs definitely intend and will do, but its really far off. A far future plan is very different from a random unsubstantiated claim.
Anyway, PC locking is being fixed in 4 days, not "SOON tm", so your whining is not serving a purpose at all.
Gû¦Gû+Supreme emperor god-kingpÇÉKAGEH¦PSHIpÇæ// Lord of threads // Forum alt Gû¦Gû+
|
Kaughst
Nyain San Renegade Alliance
240
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 22:08:00 -
[14] - Quote
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:Rinzler XVIII wrote:KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=146326 CCP Logibro wrote:Hey guys
With the Rubicon 1.3 release on 2014-03-11 we are aiming to deploy two changes, one to Planetary Conquest and one to Factional Warfare. At this stage we're waiting for QA to confirm both changes are good to go, but we have announced it earlier to give corporations in Planetary Conquest a chance to be aware of the changes.
Planetary Conquest: Locking a district will now ensure the attacker loses clones and ISK when there is no battle result
This means that if no battle takes place, or if a battle is reverted due to it not being completed, the attackers will lose clones as per a normal loss.
Factional Warfare: Adjusted the battle spawning so that factions will need to spend more time defending their districts proportionally to the number of districts they control
What this means is that as a faction controls a higher percentage of districts in the warzone, it will generate more defense contracts for that faction. It is being fixed, now quit with the childish tantrums. Sorry but taking 6 months to fix something after constantly being told about it simply IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH Imagine if my washing machine was broken and I called a plumber out to fix it and he then proceeded to take 6 months to fix it even though I called him everyday to tell him it was broken .. do you think I should then be happy when he finally gets round to fix it after having to spend 6 months with the broken washing machine ? No .. hell No .. Quit pandering to CCP it's far more childish ... You need to look up the definition of words like "pandering" before using them in a sentence, otherwise it makes you sound like an idiot. Yes it took a long time to fix, but what good is complaining it now when about if its about to be fixed in 4 days? You aren't helping anything, you're just raging, so yes you are being childish. As for other things in your OP: There is a difference between choosing to do nothing about a problem, and not being able to until other priorities are dealt with (PC only effects a small percentage of players, so not a big priority compared to new dropsuits and weapons). They do give us information. They gave us info on a variety of subjects including new weapons, new dropsuits, bonus changes, the rifle nerfs, MD buff, laser rifle buff, and a lot more. Saying they don't share any info at all is just plain lying. When something is "SOON tm" its not a rumor, because it is something he devs definitely intend and will do, but its really far off. A far future plan is very different from a random unsubstantiated claim. Anyway, PC locking is being fixed in 4 days, not "Soon tm", so your whining is not serving a purpose at all.
It is amazing that this simple creative fix was all done by flying in some guy from Iceland...we should fly more people in from Iceland.
"That is not how you say my name."
"How do you say your name?"
"I don't know but that is not how you say it."
|
Onesimus Tarsus
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
1446
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 22:18:00 -
[15] - Quote
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=146326 CCP Logibro wrote:Hey guys
With the Rubicon 1.3 release on 2014-03-11 we are aiming to deploy two changes, one to Planetary Conquest and one to Factional Warfare. At this stage we're waiting for QA to confirm both changes are good to go, but we have announced it earlier to give corporations in Planetary Conquest a chance to be aware of the changes.
Planetary Conquest: Locking a district will now ensure the attacker loses clones and ISK when there is no battle result
This means that if no battle takes place, or if a battle is reverted due to it not being completed, the attackers will lose clones as per a normal loss.
Factional Warfare: Adjusted the battle spawning so that factions will need to spend more time defending their districts proportionally to the number of districts they control
What this means is that as a faction controls a higher percentage of districts in the warzone, it will generate more defense contracts for that faction. It is being fixed, now quit with the childish tantrums.
It isn't fixed yet, so be patient with the tantrums.
Unless you're just addicted to wetsuit paperdolls...
|
Croned
628
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 22:23:00 -
[16] - Quote
Onesimus Tarsus wrote:KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=146326 CCP Logibro wrote:Hey guys
With the Rubicon 1.3 release on 2014-03-11 we are aiming to deploy two changes, one to Planetary Conquest and one to Factional Warfare. At this stage we're waiting for QA to confirm both changes are good to go, but we have announced it earlier to give corporations in Planetary Conquest a chance to be aware of the changes.
Planetary Conquest: Locking a district will now ensure the attacker loses clones and ISK when there is no battle result
This means that if no battle takes place, or if a battle is reverted due to it not being completed, the attackers will lose clones as per a normal loss.
Factional Warfare: Adjusted the battle spawning so that factions will need to spend more time defending their districts proportionally to the number of districts they control
What this means is that as a faction controls a higher percentage of districts in the warzone, it will generate more defense contracts for that faction. It is being fixed, now quit with the childish tantrums. It isn't fixed yet, so be patient with the tantrums. It's being fixed on the 11th, so quit supporting the tantrums.
Son of a plasma cannon!
TTK of the Weapons
|
|
CCP Logibro
C C P C C P Alliance
5679
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 23:20:00 -
[17] - Quote
Locked for reopening a locked thread.
CCP Logibro // EVE Universe Community Team // Distributor of Nanites // Patron Saint of Logistics
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |