Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Fremder V1
Armed And Aimless
8
|
Posted - 2014.02.13 12:07:00 -
[1] - Quote
It could be a new variant of the current remote explosives. Only one could be carried and active at the same time. Huge damage output.
I'm talking about roughly 5k damage. Maybe 4-6k, depending on tier. It would be a specialised anti tank tool. It could be a lot faster deployed than the normal ones, which usually require dancing around the tank for a minute, in hopes to stick three or four on them, without getting noticed or shot.
While a lot less usefull against infantry, since you only get 1, tanks would either need to stay near their foot soldiers, or be very carefull. Like a heavy when a minja is around.
Opinions? |
MINA Longstrike
2Shitz 1Giggle
290
|
Posted - 2014.02.13 12:12:00 -
[2] - Quote
"I am a whiny baby who wants to be able to 1hit the mean tanks that 'mess with my game', I don't want to cope and I don't want to have to spec into av, I just want vehicles dead, dead, dead! Or better yet removed from the game so I can treat this like CoD".
That about sum it up? |
killertojo42
Sardaukar Merc Guild
3
|
Posted - 2014.02.13 12:18:00 -
[3] - Quote
MINA Longstrike wrote:"I am a whiny baby who wants to be able to 1hit the mean tanks that 'mess with my game', I don't want to cope and I don't want to have to spec into av, I just want vehicles dead, dead, dead! Or better yet removed from the game so I can treat this like CoD".
That about sum it up? First off screw COD and second keep vehiclesbut increase the cost of tank and decrease blast radius of missiles on assault dropships so they're harder to use as anything but ant-vehicle as was originally intended
When walking on the battlefield i stand alone
|
Fremder V1
Armed And Aimless
8
|
Posted - 2014.02.13 12:54:00 -
[4] - Quote
MINA Longstrike wrote:"I am a whiny baby who wants to be able to 1hit the mean tanks that 'mess with my game', I don't want to cope and I don't want to have to spec into av, I just want vehicles dead, dead, dead! Or better yet removed from the game so I can treat this like CoD".
That about sum it up?
Wow... Not sure what made you that bitter, but i think you're in the wrong thread. |
killertojo42
Sardaukar Merc Guild
3
|
Posted - 2014.02.13 13:11:00 -
[5] - Quote
Hey a heavy duty RE is a really good idea but it better have an extremely short blast radius to keep it very specialized
When walking on the battlefield i stand alone
|
Fremder V1
Armed And Aimless
8
|
Posted - 2014.02.13 13:40:00 -
[6] - Quote
Agreed, tojo. I don't want to suggest the ultimate weapon either. Also, i don't propose it as a direct counter to any current imbalance, even though it could help in this regard. I just used the normal remotes in my tank hunt often enough by now, to see that a heavy duty version with a single use could be an easy to implement and fun new toy. One that could add a new layer to the current tank/av-tactics.
If OP, UP, or just right should be merely a matter of number crunching. |
TheEnd762
SVER True Blood General Tso's Alliance
429
|
Posted - 2014.02.13 13:46:00 -
[7] - Quote
Do it, so I can put it on a jihad jeep. |
killertojo42
Sardaukar Merc Guild
4
|
Posted - 2014.02.13 13:49:00 -
[8] - Quote
Fremder V1 wrote:Agreed, tojo. I don't want to suggest the ultimate weapon either. Also, i don't propose it as a direct counter to any current imbalance, even though it could help in this regard. I just used the normal remotes in my tank hunt often enough by now, to see that a heavy duty version with a single use could be an easy to implement and fun new toy. One that could add a new layer to the current tank/av-tactics. If OP, UP, or just right should be merely a matter of number crunching. And make it two 2,000 damage REs as a basic version so it's not run too OP and requires skill to use
When walking on the battlefield i stand alone
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 :: [one page] |