DUST Search - kb/m threads with no acknowledgment from CCP

Teilka Darkmist wrote:

M McManus wrote:

CCP, all we want to know is.. Has any attention been given to these threads and or changes been Implemented for 1.8 we're not asking for raw input we're asking for Chromosome standard mouse response/sensitvity and the ability to be competitive vs Aim-Assist.. ( is that so wrong ?) As it stands currently, Mouse users have what feels like a anti-aim assist.. Could we please get some kind of response, this has been a question of concern for going on 7months now...

Here is a list of the newest/most detailed kb/m threads I could find that CCP continues to ignore..

I know there are more out there but couldn't find them link them here and ill update the thread..

https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1426808#post1426808

https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=137216

https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1723903#post1723903

Maybe try asking in the feedback section of the forums rather than general discussion?

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
M McManus 380	Posted - 2014.01.24 17:12:00 - [1] - Quote CCP, all we want to know is.. Has any attention been given to these threads and or changes been Implemented for 1.8 we're not asking for raw input we're asking for Chromosome standard mouse response/sensitvity and the ability to be competitive vs Aim-Assist.. ( is that so wrong ?) As it stands currently, Mouse users have what feels like a anti-aim assist.. Could we please get some kind of response, this has been a question of concern for going on 7months now... Here is a list of the newest/most detailed kb/m threads I could find that CCP continues to ignore.. I know there are more out there but couldn't find them link them here and ill update the thread.. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1426808#post1426808 https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=137216 https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1723903#post1723903
Leadfoot10 Molon Labe. Public Disorder. 281	Posted - 2014.01.24 17:14:00 - [2] - Quote Dear lord, I hope they address the KBM issues. I had high hope that separate sensitivity settings for ADS and hipfire would improve things significantly, but, alas, it did not pan out that way.
Arkena Wyrnspire Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention 8326	Posted - 2014.01.24 17:54:00 - [3] - Quote M McManus wrote: CCP, all we want to know is.. Has any attention been given to these threads and or changes been Implemented for 1.8 So began thousands of threads, but there was only silence. Level 5 Proficiency 3 Forum Warrior Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution
bolsh lee Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN. 883	Posted - 2014.01.24 18:10:00 - [4] - Quote Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: M McManus wrote: CCP, all we want to know is.. Has any attention been given to these threads and or changes been Implemented for 1.8 So began thousands of threads, but there was only silence. Yep... Contrary to popular belief I think the m/kb community is a dying breed the last nail in the coffin was Uprising, it seems like this Is what CCP wants. My lil thread is below, you can add that to the list if you'd like... https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=131284
Iskandar Zul Karnain Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 2536	Posted - 2014.01.24 18:37:00 - [5] - Quote Abandon hope. Jihad Jeep Proficiency V Red Line Sniper Proficiency III
Teilka Darkmist 62	Posted - 2014.01.24 18:47:00 - [6] - Quote M McManus wrote: CCP, all we want to know is.. Has any attention been given to these threads and or changes been Implemented for 1.8 we're not asking for raw input we're asking for Chromosome standard mouse response/sensitvity and the ability to be competitive vs Aim-Assist.. ( is that so wrong ?) As it stands currently, Mouse users have what feels like a anti-aim assist.. Could we please get some kind of response, this has been a question of concern for going on 7months now... Here is a list of the newest/most detailed kb/m threads I could find that CCP continues to ignore.. I know there are more out there but couldn't find them link them here and ill update the thread.. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1426808#post1426808 https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=137216 https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1723903#post1723903 Maybe try asking in the feedback section of the forums rather than general discussion? When I play as a sniper, I'm more likely to be nearer to the opponents redline than my own.
M McManus 381	Posted - 2014.01.24 19:29:00 - [7] - Quote Teilka Darkmist wrote: M McManus wrote: CCP, all we want to know is.. Has any attention been given to these threads and or changes been Implemented for 1.8 we're not asking for raw input we're asking for Chromosome standard mouse response/sensitvity and the ability to be competitive vs Aim-Assist.. ( is that so wrong ?) As it stands currently, Mouse users have what feels like a anti-aim assist.. Could we please get some kind of response, this has been a question of concern for going on 7months now... Here is a list of the newest/most detailed kb/m threads I could find that CCP continues to ignore.. I know there are more out there but couldn't find them link them here and ill update the thread.. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1426808#post1426808 https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=137216 https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1723903#post1723903 Maybe try asking in the feedback section of the forums rather than general discussion? Maybe try clicking the links and seeing for yourself that one of those threads is in "feedback" which btw if I had a kill for ever kb/m thread I've seen in feedback that CCP hasn't responded too, I'd have a positive kdr...
M McManus 387	Posted - 2014.01.28 01:38:00 - [8] - Quote Updated


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page