| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
MercilessFisting
G.R.A.V.E
INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
4
   |
Posted - 2014.01.22 20:48:00 -
[1] - Quote
Instead of removing Logi weaponry, or nerf this or buff that.
Make every weapon better on its racial assault suit. Just like the LR is only "good" on an Amarrian assault suit, do the same with all the others. Better RoF, more accuracy, whatever. Make the mass driver good again, give the LR some range and bring it back to life. it's nice not to see AR every time, but.... |
Marad''er
Ancient Exiles.
Renegade Alliance
520
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 20:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
No. Nothing good will come by making the rifles better.
Especially the RR and CR
GôÉGô¥GôÿGô£Gôö > GôÉGô¢Gô¢
Gÿà¿When will dust get better?Gÿà
Forum Warrior LV. 4 | pâÅpéñpâápü»tºüpü«µëôµÆâpéÆF¦ápüúpüªpüäpéï | PSN: I-NINJA-ALL-DAY
|
Shiruba Ryou
146
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 20:52:00 -
[3] - Quote
They just did what your suggesting with the Logi equipment. Their racial equipment is only "good" on the racial paired logistics suit.
They nerfed the equipment so that each races bonues would actually matter. If they left it alone then their would be no point in really picking one suit over the other since that bonus would just make that one thing even better than it already is. Which is not making it "good" on that suit. Just "OP" on that suit.
"Not to worry. The cards say you loved it."
- Ryoutoshi
|
knight of 6
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
1214
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 20:59:00 -
[4] - Quote
I think CCP is a step ahead of you, on sisi the assault is getting a 5% rof bonus per level 
"God favors the side with the best artillery" ~ Napoleon
Ko6, scout.
CLOSED BETA VET
|
Teilka Darkmist
45
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 21:02:00 -
[5] - Quote
Shiruba Ryou wrote:They just did what your suggesting with the Logi equipment. Their racial equipment is only "good" on the racial paired logistics suit.
They nerfed the equipment so that each races bonues would actually matter. If they left it alone then their would be no point in really picking one suit over the other since that bonus would just make that one thing even better than it already is. Which is not making it "good" on that suit. Just "OP" on that suit.
So you're saying they balanced the equipment so that the racial bonuses, which make sense to be on the racial suits, don't make the equipment overpowered?
@OP, you're right. Racial weaponry should be 'better' on the relevant racial suit. The way CCP does this is to apply bonuses to the suit, presumable it makes sense from a coding point of view rather than have the weapon alter it's stats if it is on the relevant suit. How they decide what is better is up to CCP, it doesn't have to mean causes more damage, it could be increases effective range or reduces CPU and/or PG need.
When I play as a sniper, I'm more likely to be nearer to the opponents redline than my own.
|
Ankbar Latrommi
Immortal Guides
40
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 21:05:00 -
[6] - Quote
knight of 6 wrote:I think CCP is a step ahead of you, on sisi the assault is getting a 5% rof bonus per level
There's nothing racial in that bonus.
Reiner Knizia-"When playing a game, the goal is to win, but it is the goal that is important, not the winning."
Eve> FPS
|
KEROSIINI-TERO
The Rainbow Effect
995
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 21:12:00 -
[7] - Quote
No.
If guns are better on certain suits, that creates a new 'par' for weapon balance as the guns have to be balanced taking the strongest version into account.
That means guns on other suits are sub-par and it would be simply dumb to fit them.
And the very moment we reach that point we've killed a lot of creativity in fitting.
How is this different from logi equipment?
It is partially the same and partially different (I don't btw embrace the racial EQ as a great change).
It's different because logi's have multiple EQ slots and instead of having the need to fit multiple EQs of same type, most of the time variety is preferred. That dilutes the effect of racial EQ bonuses.
FEEDBACK: Analysis on 1.7 tank functionality
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |