| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Alena Ventrallis
The Neutral Zone
454
   |
Posted - 2014.01.08 02:50:00 -
[1] - Quote
Posted this in another thread, was told making it its own thread would be a good idea.
So we have permahardened tanks that can shrug off just about everything, and most times keep their passive regen up (in the case of gunnlogis) so how about this.
Standardize all vehicle hardener tiers to the same up time and cool down times. I suggested to current militia hardener times, but this part is flexible.
Instead of reducing the cool down period as you go up tiers, have it increase damage resistance as you go up the tiers.
Armor hardeners:
MLT - 20%
STD - 30%
ADV - 40%
PRO - 50%
Shield:
MLT - 40%
STD - 50%
ADV - 60%
PRO - 70%
As you can see, the current hardener resist values would be the advanced tier. This makes a bigger difference between militia and proto hardeners. Makes permahardened tanks near impossible, and gives running proto hardeners a better boost, since the high resist means even less can harm you while your hardener is up. When it goes down, however...
And even better, this doesn't hurt the real tankers who have invested so into getting the proto stuff, and only hurts the scrubs who are using cheap militia tanks as a crutch. |
Beck Weathers
Ghosts of Dawn
General Tso's Alliance
241
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 02:55:00 -
[2] - Quote
I kinda like this, Im not a big fan of everyones equipment is equaly good, it just has shorter cool down timers. Makign Malita tank equipment sux would help cut down on tank spam allot. |
Harpyja
DUST University
Ivy League
1038
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 03:06:00 -
[3] - Quote
I'd rather keep current cooldown/active times, reduce the effectiveness of MLT through ADV, and limit to one shield/hardener.
The problem is that the "waves of opportunity" goes away when you cycle more than one hardener. Reducing the effectiveness of all but complex is necessary though because there isn't enough of a gap between invested/dedicated pilots and 0 SP FOTM wannabes.
Also, as much as I'd like a 70% shield hardener, I think that's a bit too much.
"By His light, and His will"
- The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32
|
TunRa
NEW OMENS
345
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 04:35:00 -
[4] - Quote
150% resist without penalty, so it would be like what 95%?
Thanks CCP Foxfour
|
LUGMOS
YELLOW JESUS EXP FORCE
250
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 04:49:00 -
[5] - Quote
As long as the actuve duration is lower on the shield hardeners, it should be fine, as the Caldari HAV should be hit and run.
The biggest threat to my scout is everything.
My scout is the biggest threat to everything.
|
Charlotte O'Dell
Fatal Absolution
Covert Intervention
1477
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 13:17:00 -
[6] - Quote
I like this idea, but only if we buff AV dmg so with hardeneers off, they can actually kill tanks.
Charlotte O'Dell is the highest level unicorn!
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |