| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
knight guard fury
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
788
   |
Posted - 2014.01.04 01:24:00 -
[1] - Quote
but we need ALL of our old game-modes back. its knida boring doing 2 game-modes all the time, and it would be nice to see 1.0 skirmish in dust right now and we also need all our old maps back as well even if it supports sniper(they need maps as well).
it doesn't matter if its one sided or not but we really need everything from closed beta till now in the game.
but most of all we need our warbarge back as well, since we no longer call battles "instant action"
In Rust We Trust,
true to the Republic,
Kherokior warrior
|
Michael Arck
Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu
2493
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 01:35:00 -
[2] - Quote
Hey, what was that "Rush" mode everyone speaks fondly of? I came along once it got out of closed beta...
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu.
For the State!!
[email protected]
|
Pvt Numnutz
Black Phoenix Mercenaries
Legacy Rising
580
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 01:41:00 -
[3] - Quote
Yeah, was nice to see who was on our team and who we were fighting before battle. Please bring back the warbarge, I miss saluting the caldari flag before every battle, brought me luck! |
Aizen Intiki
Hell's Gate Inc
League of Infamy
638
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 01:43:00 -
[4] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:Hey, what was that "Rush" mode everyone speaks fondly of? I came along once it got out of closed beta...
Skirmish 1.0, and not really Rush. See, there was 2 points the attackers had to hit: First one was some mobile defenses like the NULL cannons. You either had to destroy them or hack them long enough to let the MCC pass. If the MCC hit armor, then the game ends, and the defenders won. If the MCC got to pass through the defenses getting hacked or the defenses destroyed, then it would go to the next stage of the map (which we know as the communications map), and the defenders would have to guard and keep the NULL Cannons online long enough to kill the MCC, while the attackers had to turn off the NULL cannons long enough to let the MCC dock.
"Hello, world!" lol, sounds like something a whore lover would say
Alt of the great Godin
I like chocolate ^___^
|
Altina McAlterson
Pure Innocence.
EoN.
724
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 01:43:00 -
[5] - Quote
Pvt Numnutz wrote:Yeah, was nice to see who was on our team and who we were fighting before battle. Please bring back the warbarge, I miss saluting the caldari flag before every battle, brought me luck!
I really stopped caring about the warbarge when they made the female scout suit less curvy. It's not the reason this particular toon is female but it was a pleasant bonus nonetheless.
"STFU I'm awesome, all your points are invalid as I kill proto's all the time nubs." - Infinite Diversity IDIC
|
knight guard fury
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
789
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 01:53:00 -
[6] - Quote
ccp might consider it if we had enough people we could all petitione it and we got enough players to join our cause, but even still it would propably be awhile for ccp to decide
In Rust We Trust,
true to the Republic,
Kherokior warrior
|
Michael Arck
Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu
2493
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 01:57:00 -
[7] - Quote
Aizen Intiki wrote:Michael Arck wrote:Hey, what was that "Rush" mode everyone speaks fondly of? I came along once it got out of closed beta... Skirmish 1.0, and not really Rush. See, there was 2 points the attackers had to hit: First one was some mobile defenses like the NULL cannons. You either had to destroy them or hack them long enough to let the MCC pass. If the MCC hit armor, then the game ends, and the defenders won. If the MCC got to pass through the defenses getting hacked or the defenses destroyed, then it would go to the next stage of the map (which we know as the communications map), and the defenders would have to guard and keep the NULL Cannons online long enough to kill the MCC, while the attackers had to turn off the NULL cannons long enough to let the MCC dock.
Thanks for the explanation 
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu.
For the State!!
[email protected]
|
Aizen Intiki
Hell's Gate Inc
League of Infamy
640
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 02:05:00 -
[8] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:Aizen Intiki wrote:Michael Arck wrote:Hey, what was that "Rush" mode everyone speaks fondly of? I came along once it got out of closed beta... Skirmish 1.0, and not really Rush. See, there was 2 points the attackers had to hit: First one was some mobile defenses like the NULL cannons. You either had to destroy them or hack them long enough to let the MCC pass. If the MCC hit armor, then the game ends, and the defenders won. If the MCC got to pass through the defenses getting hacked or the defenses destroyed, then it would go to the next stage of the map (which we know as the communications map), and the defenders would have to guard and keep the NULL Cannons online long enough to kill the MCC, while the attackers had to turn off the NULL cannons long enough to let the MCC dock. Thanks for the explanation
No problem. Oh, I almost forgot: We used to have small turret installations on the first skirmish 1.0 map.
"Hello, world!" lol, sounds like something a whore lover would say
Alt of the great Godin
I like chocolate ^___^
|
Sylwester Dziewiecki
Interregnum.
225
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 02:09:00 -
[9] - Quote
knight guard fury wrote:ccp might consider it if we had enough people we could all petitione it and we got enough players to join our cause, but even still it would propably be awhile for ccp to decide
I would prefer to see all racial variants of Scout and Heavy suit in game, rather than forcing CCP to remake Skirmish 1.0.
I bet that many players that had occasion to play on S1.0 despite sentiments, would like to see Fighters and Altiery and other promised stuff  .
I'm here since may 2012, my EVE alter ego is Nosum Hseebnrido.
|
knight guard fury
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
789
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 02:11:00 -
[10] - Quote
Sylwester Dziewiecki wrote:knight guard fury wrote:ccp might consider it if we had enough people we could all petitione it and we got enough players to join our cause, but even still it would propably be awhile for ccp to decide I would prefer to see all racial variants of Scout and Heavy suit in game, rather than forcing CCP to remake Skirmish 1.0. I bet that many players that had occasion to play on S1.0 despite sentiments, would like to see Fighters and Altiery and other promised stuff .
I didn't say remake, I said add it in and rename it something else
In Rust We Trust,
true to the Republic,
Kherokior warrior
|
|
|
Vrain Matari
ZionTCD
Public Disorder.
1423
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 02:20:00 -
[11] - Quote
knight guard fury wrote:but we need ALL of our old game-modes back. its knida boring doing 2 game-modes all the time, and it would be nice to see 1.0 skirmish in dust right now and we also need all our old maps back as well even if it supports sniper(they need maps as well).
it doesn't matter if its one sided or not but we really need everything from closed beta till now in the game.
but most of all we need our warbarge back as well, since we no longer call battles "instant action"
Nobody cares if it's one-sided: we're primarily motivated by having fun and enjoying the DUST experience.
CCP appears to be using a different metric for their game modes.
I support SP rollover.
|
knight guard fury
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
789
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 02:24:00 -
[12] - Quote
Vrain Matari wrote:knight guard fury wrote:but we need ALL of our old game-modes back. its knida boring doing 2 game-modes all the time, and it would be nice to see 1.0 skirmish in dust right now and we also need all our old maps back as well even if it supports sniper(they need maps as well).
it doesn't matter if its one sided or not but we really need everything from closed beta till now in the game.
but most of all we need our warbarge back as well, since we no longer call battles "instant action" Nobody cares if it's one-sided: we're primarily motivated by having fun and enjoying the DUST experience. CCP appears to be using a different metric for their game modes.
did I ever say if anyone cared if it was one-sided.
I simply said that I didn't care and they should bring everything back
In Rust We Trust,
true to the Republic,
Kherokior warrior
|
Aikuchi Tomaru
Subdreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
1472
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 02:43:00 -
[13] - Quote
Aizen Intiki wrote:Michael Arck wrote:Hey, what was that "Rush" mode everyone speaks fondly of? I came along once it got out of closed beta... Skirmish 1.0, and not really Rush. See, there was 2 points the attackers had to hit: First one was some mobile defenses like the NULL cannons. You either had to destroy them or hack them long enough to let the MCC pass. If the MCC hit armor, then the game ends, and the defenders won. If the MCC got to pass through the defenses getting hacked or the defenses destroyed, then it would go to the next stage of the map (which we know as the communications map), and the defenders would have to guard and keep the NULL Cannons online long enough to kill the MCC, while the attackers had to turn off the NULL cannons long enough to let the MCC dock.
It's so beautiful and would make much more sense for FW. I hope CCP soon figures out how to introduce it again. I heard they made some changes which make the reintroduction of Skirmish 1.0 very hard.
Sign up for Caldari FW and defeat the evil Gallente Overlords!
|
Vrain Matari
ZionTCD
Public Disorder.
1425
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 05:19:00 -
[14] - Quote
knight guard fury wrote:Vrain Matari wrote:knight guard fury wrote:but we need ALL of our old game-modes back. its knida boring doing 2 game-modes all the time, and it would be nice to see 1.0 skirmish in dust right now and we also need all our old maps back as well even if it supports sniper(they need maps as well).
it doesn't matter if its one sided or not but we really need everything from closed beta till now in the game.
but most of all we need our warbarge back as well, since we no longer call battles "instant action" Nobody cares if it's one-sided: we're primarily motivated by having fun and enjoying the DUST experience. CCP appears to be using a different metric for their game modes. did I ever say if anyone cared if it was one-sided. I simply said that I didn't care and they should bring everything back
Poor wording on my part - i was agreeing with you.
I support SP rollover.
|
Soraya Xel
The Corporate Raiders
Top Men.
866
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 05:27:00 -
[15] - Quote
Skirmish 1.0 literally would not function on the current game. It's not like CCP can cut and paste a game mode from a year-older version of DUST.
I'd like to be your CPM1 candidate
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |