| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Tonka Legacy
THIRD EARTH INCORPORATED
Dark Taboo
3
   |
Posted - 2013.12.23 08:35:00 -
[1] - Quote
So we all noticed the surplus of tanks, and a few more assault dropships. Most of the Tanks are all militia, and there is nothing wrong with that, and they are cheaper than the duvolle tac assault rifle. Tanks were beefed up a lot and AV weponds were nerfed (for some reason), so people are driving these things around like crazy, even I do sometimes. But also, I'm skilled into assault dropships which are for some reason 300k per ship...now unlike most people, I'm not a millionaire. If tanks don't cost anywhere near that much for any type, why the the ever so fragile dropships cost so much? Because they can carry people around to things? pssh nah, I don't know how to make it so blueberries don't have to wait 15 seconds to board my ship, so by then, there are already a few enemy rail tanks waiting for a brave little ship to fly into the air. Tanks can pull off 30 kills a game, a dropship struggles for 10. So I'm asking if yaw can change the prices a bit. Its never good to lose that much money in a match. |
Meee One
Clones Of The Damned
Zero-Day
35
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 09:09:00 -
[2] - Quote
Lolno i've seen dropships hold their own against tanks since the update.
ALL vehicles but LAVs are OP.
You can say "ever so fragile" (3k armor/shields isn't fragile)
and "brave little ship" ( that can hold 3 more people than a tank) all you want but it's a lie and you know it. Especially since DS can use afterburners and fly REALLY high.
Also "struggles to get 10 kills" boo hoo you can't out tank a tank.
You are a DS pilot stick to your role which is as a troop transport,if you want to out tank a tank,become a tanker.
Trying to con CCP into lowering costs for the "poor,pitiful,weak and fragile DS pilots" is a dirty move.
Costs on tanks should increase to match DS not the reverse.
EDIT: I have realised you are a troll (and a bad one) because only a troll would suggest something so unfair. |
Tonka Legacy
THIRD EARTH INCORPORATED
Dark Taboo
3
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 09:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
Meee One wrote:Lolno i've seen dropships hold their own against tanks since the update.
ALL vehicles but LAVs are OP.
You can say "ever so fragile" (3k armor/shields isn't fragile)
and "brave little ship" ( that can hold 3 more people than a tank) all you want but it's a lie and you know it. Especially since DS can use afterburners and fly REALLY high.
Also "struggles to get 10 kills" boo hoo you can't out tank a tank.
You are a DS pilot stick to your role which is as a troop transport,if you want to out tank a tank,become a tanker.
Trying to con CCP into lowering costs for the "poor,pitiful,weak and fragile DS pilots" is a dirty move.
Costs on tanks should increase to match DS not the reverse.
EDIT: I have realised you are a troll (and a bad one) because only a troll would suggest something so unfair.
well 1st of all buddy, I'm not here to argue, we are here to post ideas, not what you call con.
2nd of all, I'm hoping they make tanks more expensive.
I don't know what your problem is or why your so defensive on the topic, but your obviously not a pilot, so "RESPECTFULLY" I was not looking for your negative attitude comments. Be mature about it or just don't post. And on a final note, I don't think Tanks are a problem at all, but I feel they shouldn't cost as low as a proto AR. Again, this is opinion based and no one said that this is actually going to happen, but if you want to get hurt about it, complain about that somewhere else. Thank you. |
Tonka Legacy
THIRD EARTH INCORPORATED
Dark Taboo
3
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 09:31:00 -
[4] - Quote
Also I will not respond to future rage messages, try sending a counter idea to the idea, at least then we can talk about the subject. |
Meee One
Clones Of The Damned
Zero-Day
35
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 09:45:00 -
[5] - Quote
Tonka Legacy wrote:Also I will not respond to future rage messages, try sending a counter idea to the idea, at least then we can talk about the subject.
Let me translate that: I'm mature and unless you talk about things that will benefit me i'll ignore you.Because criticism is painful and if you disagree with me your obviously immature,and raging.
Ok I understand. |
Tonka Legacy
THIRD EARTH INCORPORATED
Dark Taboo
3
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 09:47:00 -
[6] - Quote
Bingo |
Meee One
Clones Of The Damned
Zero-Day
36
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 09:53:00 -
[7] - Quote
You do realise i was describing all the things that makes someone immature right?
Me,me,me mentality. And by saying "bingo" you just agreed you are horribly selfish and immature. |
Tonka Legacy
THIRD EARTH INCORPORATED
Dark Taboo
3
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 09:54:00 -
[8] - Quote
Meee One wrote:Tonka Legacy wrote:Also I will not respond to future rage messages, try sending a counter idea to the idea, at least then we can talk about the subject. Let me translate that: I'm mature and unless you talk about things that will benefit me i'll ignore you.Because criticism is painful and if you disagree with me your obviously immature,and raging. Ok I understand.
Bingo, I am honestly surprised you didn't send some form of a comeback like some mad 12 year old kid, I respect that. I know you don't like the idea, and most people won't. I am not trying change the game significantly with my ideas. Its JUST an idea. |
Meee One
Clones Of The Damned
Zero-Day
36
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 09:58:00 -
[9] - Quote
Like i said in my first post (if would have read it).
I said instead of decreasing DS prices,increase HAV prices to match them.
But i guess you ignored that part. |
Tonka Legacy
THIRD EARTH INCORPORATED
Dark Taboo
3
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 09:59:00 -
[10] - Quote
Meee One wrote:You do realise i was describing all the things that makes someone immature right? Me,me,me mentality. And by saying "bingo" you just agreed you are horribly selfish and immature.
selfish? Now hows that? I gave an idea like we are suppose to here, and you chose to target my topic. YOU attacked ME. |
|
|
Tonka Legacy
THIRD EARTH INCORPORATED
Dark Taboo
3
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 10:04:00 -
[11] - Quote
Meee One wrote:Like i said in my first post (if would have read it).
I said instead of decreasing DS prices,increase HAV prices to match them.
But i guess you ignored that part.
yes, i guess i missed that...sorry dude. Guess I'm in the wrong here. That is pretty selfish... |
Tonka Legacy
THIRD EARTH INCORPORATED
Dark Taboo
3
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 10:40:00 -
[12] - Quote
And remember folks, always read something carefully, or you may end up falsely calling someone out. I no I did. "And now we know!" And knowing is half the battle!
G.I.JOE!
Anyway, yes, long story short, just raise the prices of HAV's to equal the dropships is what I and mee was suggesting, and maybe make LAV's a bit more useful other than for scanning and suicide bombing missions. |
Kallas Hallytyr
Skullbreakers
190
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 11:48:00 -
[13] - Quote
Meee one does not understand what it is to be a Dropship pilot. He likely also believes that all Logistics players should be pack mules for Assaults, who do the "real" work...
Simple fact is that Assault Dropships are incredibly expensive for such a fragile and exposed vehicle. Whilst Dropships have the advantage of manoeuvrability over tanks, that benefit is negated when a redline rail-tank can sit back half a kilometre away, with elevation gained from hills removing the height advantage, and pop any ship they see in two (unhardened) to four (hardened) shots.
A price reduction of Assault Dropship hulls would bring them reasonably in line with tanks, in that they would be reasonably expensive when fitted but not overly expensive meaning that the loss of one does not immediately prevent you from going ISK positive in the next few battles. For example, my Python costs over 500,000 ISK, because I have fitted Complex modules...except that more than 3/5ths of the price comes from the hull alone while less than 200,000 ISK is spent on three Complex modules and a prototype turret. I see Madrugars and Gunnlogis rolling around with prototype (large) turrets and modules that cost less than my Python, and it's frustrating because my ship is infinitely more vulnerable to the primary counter to the tanks that are present. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |