DUST Search - Request: Remove scanners from HAVs and LAVs

All Channels

Feedback/Requests

Request: Remove scanners from HAVs and LAVs

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Meee One Clones Of The Damned Zero-Day 31	Posted - 2013.12.22 02:12:00 - [1] - Quote Since HAVs currently move really fast,and can repair any damage as it's being done. I request the removal of HAVs and LAVs scanning ability. Dropships would keep the ability since they are in significantly more danger,while they scan. Scanning on a god-like vehicle only adds insult to injury. Because as infantry risks death using their scanners vehicles can just rapidly flee or even take the attacks and shrug them off. Make them have a reliance on infantry scanners and dropships' scanning. This way a single tank won't charge a point like a madman,it will make tankers consider waiting for support. Lest the get swarmed to death.
TheEnd762 SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 271	Posted - 2013.12.22 02:40:00 - [2] - Quote Agreed, +1.
Dunce Masterson Savage Bullet 8	Posted - 2013.12.22 02:56:00 - [3] - Quote -1 no way how about we remove the ability of logistics suits to be able to equip damage mods while we are at it and give all logistics suits only 3 high and 3 low slots on all of them how about we give all the assault suits 4 highs and 4 lows and 210 shield and armor hp with 25 shield recharge rate so that their 5% shield recharge rate is worth a dam ect. ect.
Meee One Clones Of The Damned Zero-Day 31	Posted - 2013.12.22 03:47:00 - [4] - Quote Dunce Masterson wrote: -1 no way how about we remove the ability of logistics suits to be able to equip damage mods while we are at it and give all logistics suits only 3 high and 3 low slots on all of them how about we give all the assault suits 4 highs and 4 lows and 210 shield and armor hp with 25 shield recharge rate so that their 5% shield recharge rate is worth a dam ect. ect. Wow,all i said was 'remove this one module'. And off you go on a tangent.I didn't say reduce speed,armor or defenses. Tanks would STILL be nigh unkillable. HAVs NEED a weakness,and not having an all seeing eye is a valid one. You must be a tanker that abuses the scanner to hunt players. Also,the suits you named NEED support or they die quickly.
NDA Approved Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 20	Posted - 2013.12.22 03:50:00 - [5] - Quote Maybe instead of removing the ability outright, increase the fitting costs for scanner modules, but give the dropship skill tree a bonus to fitting costs of scanners. Imma in ur base, browsin' docs on docs. Trust me, I have clearance.
Dunce Masterson Savage Bullet 8	Posted - 2013.12.22 03:57:00 - [6] - Quote look if some meta gamer can unlock proto caldari logistic dropsuit and equip 5 complex damage mods to the suit then i see no reason for the tanker to run a scanner while his team flanks you or is waiting around the corner.
Meee One Clones Of The Damned Zero-Day 31	Posted - 2013.12.22 04:18:00 - [7] - Quote Dunce Masterson wrote: look if some meta gamer can unlock proto caldari logistic dropsuit and equip 5 complex damage mods to the suit then i see no reason for the tanker to run a scanner while his team flanks you or is waiting around the corner. Did you even do the PG/CPU cost correctly? Also,you said proto which at its base is what,53-57k just for the suit? Gone in 2 shots from an all seeing tank around the corner. So add up all the costs of (according to you) 5 complex damage mods 3-5k each. I see more than 60k isk gone already and that doesn't count the rest of the eq lost. Vs a cheap all seeing tank. Lolno How would you feel if you invested your hard earned sp into a suit and eq costing easily 100k per suit,and a noob spends maybe 60k for a nigh immortal tank you can't kill,and he can reveal you and hunt you down.(and frequently does) Doesn't seem fair does it? Because it isn't. Tankers no longer fear death.And infantry regardless of how modded they are can be brought down by other clones.
Mobius Wyvern Isuuaya Tactical Caldari State 4200	Posted - 2013.12.22 08:17:00 - [8] - Quote I don't really see the need to arbitrarily restrict certain assets from using certain modules. I mean, that's like the people that say that only Scout suits should be able to use cloaks. Part of the charm of the game is being able to fit whatever you want however you want, just like EVE. Amidst the blue skies A link from past to future The sheltering wings of the protector
dogmanpig black market bank 85	Posted - 2013.12.22 08:21:00 - [9] - Quote i personally would like to request the removal of the OP ability to post topics. You hate me, I hate you. Lets keep it that way. Level 8 1/10 Forum alt. "Its worth half a penny and a reach around"
Mobius Wyvern Isuuaya Tactical Caldari State 4200	Posted - 2013.12.22 08:27:00 - [10] - Quote dogmanpig wrote: i personally would like to request the removal of the OP ability to post topics. Sounds reasonable. I'll second that. Amidst the blue skies A link from past to future The sheltering wings of the protector

Monty Mole Clone Shiv M 88	Posted - 2013.12.22 14:07:00 - [11] - Quote removal of tacnet if a scanner is not fitted would be less harsh, removal of hav 3rd person viewpoint is also needed i think but you could give them it back via a camera drone if they give up a slot. make the drone killable
501st Headstrong Dead Man's Game 97	Posted - 2013.12.22 18:40:00 - [12] - Quote Grt a tank if you are sick of people scanning you. Stop QQ about it already. Mando & proud Minmatar Commando, join the Commando Squadron Chat 2day! https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&
Keri Starlight 0uter.Heaven 2108	Posted - 2013.12.22 18:44:00 - [13] - Quote No... 100% Achura "I load my gun with love instead of bullets"
deepfried salad gilliam Sanguine Knights 319	Posted - 2013.12.22 18:50:00 - [14] - Quote No. -1 "May God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ give you grace and peace" - Second Corinthians chapter one verse two.
Talos Alomar Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 1906	Posted - 2013.12.22 20:27:00 - [15] - Quote NDA Approved wrote: Maybe instead of removing the ability outright, increase the fitting costs for scanner modules, but give the dropship skill tree a bonus to fitting costs of scanners. This I like. Buff the hell out of vehicle scanners and give dropships and LAV's bonuses to using them. Try to kill it all you want CCP, I still <3 my laser.
Mithridates VI 2305	Posted - 2013.12.22 21:04:00 - [16] - Quote Doesn't using a scanner involve NOT fitting that slot with a module that increases offense/defence? Please refrain from utilizing such inflammatory sarcasm in the future. GÇö CCP Eterne
Talos Alomar Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 1907	Posted - 2013.12.22 22:09:00 - [17] - Quote Mithridates VI wrote: Doesn't using a scanner involve NOT fitting that slot with a module that increases offense/defence? For a shield tank, yeah. an armor tank often has a free slot in the highs due to lack of cpu/pg and the fitting costs are really low for scanners so you might as well use one. Try to kill it all you want CCP, I still <3 my laser.
Ivy Zalinto Lo-Tech Solutions Ltd 202	Posted - 2013.12.23 01:36:00 - [18] - Quote Why? Ive never been scanned by a vehicle...invest in profile dampening. Im pretty sure they only go to like...45 on vehicular scanners. Dedicated scout. New player tutor; scout instructor Scrambler Pistol dedication
NDA Approved Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 24	Posted - 2013.12.23 06:16:00 - [19] - Quote Talos Alomar wrote: NDA Approved wrote: Maybe instead of removing the ability outright, increase the fitting costs for scanner modules, but give the dropship skill tree a bonus to fitting costs of scanners. This I like. Buff the hell out of vehicle scanners and give dropships and LAV's bonuses to using them. I only say this because that is exactly what the Devs have talked about doing for cloaking modules and scouts. Imma in ur base, browsin' docs on docs. Trust me, I have clearance.
NDA Approved Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 24	Posted - 2013.12.23 06:17:00 - [20] - Quote Ivy Zalinto wrote: Why? Ive never been scanned by a vehicle...invest in profile dampening. Im pretty sure they only go to like...45 on vehicular scanners. Also, a tank never survives my attacks...ive even one shot them with their hardeners active. Flux grenade and three remote charges kill pretty much any tank out there. No, they go to 30 db on vehicles now. The only difference now I believe between modules is scan duration. Imma in ur base, browsin' docs on docs. Trust me, I have clearance.



Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.