| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
DeathwindRising
ROGUE SPADES
145
   |
Posted - 2013.12.17 13:41:00 -
[1] - Quote
http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/dust-514-review/1900-6415604/
THE GOOD
With cooperative teammates, it's occasionally a reasonable facsimile of better shooters
Weapons are imaginative sci-fi spins on the usual suspects
THE BAD
Low frame rate and muddy textures hamper gameplay and aesthetics
Poorly designed maps with little attention to scale, flow, or originality
Cumbersome menus and customization systems
Link to EVE Online and its lore is mostly theoretical |
steadyhand amarr
Scions of Athra
2102
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 13:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
That is by far the best review of dust iv seen yet and sums up exactly why 1.7 was the final straw for me this needs to be shoved into the face of the designs so dust can go under a radical rethink if not a complete reworking
"i dont care about you or your goals, just show me the dam isk"
winner of EU squad cup
GOGO power rangers
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust.
Top Men.
934
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 13:57:00 -
[3] - Quote
4/10
It is a realistic score. Very good OBJECTIVE review.
Doesnt matter in Dust 514: PC. FW Standing. Tanking Type. Other mods than DMG or HP.
Does matter in Dust 514: Rifles.
|
Malkai Inos
Onikanabo Brigade
Caldari State
1095
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 14:15:00 -
[4] - Quote
Is that a pre-nerf tac in that video?
You can take a benign object, -you can take a cheeseburger and deconstruct it to its source...
|
steadyhand amarr
Scions of Athra
2102
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 14:16:00 -
[5] - Quote
Doubt it tac rifles are still quite powerful been caught off guard plenty by them
"i dont care about you or your goals, just show me the dam isk"
winner of EU squad cup
GOGO power rangers
|
Malkai Inos
Onikanabo Brigade
Caldari State
1095
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 14:22:00 -
[6] - Quote
steadyhand amarr wrote:Doubt it tac rifles are still quite powerful been caught off guard plenty by them It has 30 bullets. Not even the proto variant has 30 bullets anymore.
They're showing readers months old footage along with the article as if it where the current state of the game.
You can take a benign object, -you can take a cheeseburger and deconstruct it to its source...
|
dent 308
Subdreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
2167
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 14:25:00 -
[7] - Quote
He has some good points, but glossed over a fair amount.
Eve integration is very real. We have pilots on comms for FW regularly. They are even fighting to hold grid and keep red strikers off us.
He makes noise about Eve's success but no mention of all the badposting and doomsaying reviews for the first few years of Eve's development.
I don't think he played for long, and I really doubt he enlisted in a corp at all.
Hail Satan
|
Vrain Matari
ZionTCD
Public Disorder.
1370
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 14:26:00 -
[8] - Quote
Spectral Clone wrote:4/10
It is a realistic score. Very good OBJECTIVE review.
EDIT: I don-Št understand why the CCP DEVs were calling this game AAA during the beta. Its not up to the DEVs to say that before they have delivered and gotten reviews saying AAA from decent reviewers...
And this is why Team Kong, the team responsible for hands-on mechanics and controls, need to be given more support/resources/tools by CCP - it's their work that drives the ability of DUST to get good reviews and for the game to be sustainable in the long-term.
Anything that is currently on Team Kong's plate that is getting in the way of this and the NPE should be split off to a new team. There's really no hope of DUST overcoming the negative reputation it's earned without Team Kong masterfully executing on core mechanics. The longer this is delated the deeper the hole DUST will have to dig itself out of.
I support SP rollover.
|
Surt gods end
Demon Ronin
1351
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 14:33:00 -
[9] - Quote
dent 308 wrote:He has some good points, but glossed over a fair amount.
Eve integration is very real. We have pilots on comms for FW regularly. They are even fighting to hold grid and keep red strikers off us.
He makes noise about Eve's success but no mention of all the badposting and doomsaying reviews for the first few years of Eve's development.
I don't think he played for long, and I really doubt he enlisted in a corp at all.
I keep seeing people say "but I bet they didn't join a corp" But I've been here since closed beta and never joined a corp.
* * |
Cat Merc
Ahrendee Mercenaries
EoN.
4757
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 15:02:00 -
[10] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:steadyhand amarr wrote:Doubt it tac rifles are still quite powerful been caught off guard plenty by them It has 30 bullets. Not even the proto variant has 30 bullets anymore. I'm not talking about the miniscule 1.7 one. I mean the one that happened around 1.2 or so. They're showing readers months old footage along with the article as if it where the current state of the game.
That's because it's not that different.
The only noticeable part really is that they changed the WP "+50" messages, and the ragdolls.
Shield regeneration bonus for Gallente Assault is about as useful as Sharpshooter for Nova Knives.
Tuna > Tacos
|
DeathwindRising
ROGUE SPADES
145
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 15:09:00 -
[11] - Quote
the tutorial in dust sucks. even eve uses bots for combat tutorial. people wouldnt have these issues if they had controlled environments where they didnt have to worry about being shot at just to learn the game.
the biggest noob in all of dust is CCP |
Gorra Snell
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
320
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 16:04:00 -
[12] - Quote
Spectral Clone wrote:
EDIT: I don-Št understand why the CCP DEVs were calling this game AAA during the beta. Its not up to the DEVs to say that before they have delivered and gotten reviews saying AAA from decent reviewers...
My impression is that they were stating a goal/intent, not describing the game as it is/was.
RDVs are a failed experiment - can't we just remove them from the game?
|
Seymor Krelborn
DUST University
Ivy League
1609
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 16:17:00 -
[13] - Quote
good review of a sub par lobby shooter..... too bad CCP isn't motivate by interviews, only their own e peen....
CCp's newest joke, making setting off your own remote explosives in FW FF... awesome job ccp.
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust.
Top Men.
937
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 16:18:00 -
[14] - Quote
Gorra Snell wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:
EDIT: I don-Št understand why the CCP DEVs were calling this game AAA during the beta. Its not up to the DEVs to say that before they have delivered and gotten reviews saying AAA from decent reviewers...
My impression is that they were stating a goal/intent, not describing the game as it is/was.
My impression is that CCP are cocky at presentations and then they deliver a 4/10 game patch after patch.
When will dust get guuuud?
Doesnt matter in Dust 514: PC. FW Standing. Tanking Type. Other mods than DMG or HP.
Does matter in Dust 514: Rifles.
|
Jake Bloodworth
Molon Labe.
Public Disorder.
235
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 16:23:00 -
[15] - Quote
He makes some excellent points in that review. I don't agree with the incredibly low score though. That is generally a score reserved for buggy, unplayable messes. Dust is very playable right now as long as you are in a Tank or enjoy medium suits.
Overall the score seems to be typical of bitter eve overlord hatred of Dust. He is spot on about the map design though. I've never once felt like a Dust map was well designed. But this is a company that, until now, created nothing but empty space with a couple planetary bodies to warp to. The newer maps show a bit more thought to flow and three dimensional battle space, but they still feel like someone just randomly dropped objectives around the map.
FIX THE HMG |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |