| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Piercing Serenity
Fatal Absolution
440
   |
Posted - 2013.12.05 03:10:00 -
[1] - Quote
We have a lot of speculation going on in these forum.
This would be a perfect time for some much needed communication between the Devs and the players.
- What prompted the shield nerf?
- Was there a reason it was released now, as opposed to earlier?
- What was this nerf supposed to accomplish?
- What is the plan moving forwards?
Answers to these questions might not cull the rage on the forums, but it would put it a lot of the thoughts and anger to better use via constructive criticism
DUST 514 BETA VET
16.2M Lifetime SP
SH4T --> PFBHz --> PFB --> SH4T --> Fatal
|
TheAmazing FlyingPig
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
4884
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 03:13:00 -
[2] - Quote
This nerf was "in the works" months ago.
Never forget
How to fix the Logi
|
Piercing Serenity
Fatal Absolution
440
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 03:15:00 -
[3] - Quote
I'm really just asking for some comments as to why it was released in Uprising 1.7, if there are specific goals they were working towards, etc.
Right now, a lot of people think that it is a way to deter brick tanking. Dev conformation or denial would be great now, and a good way to remain talkative with the playerbase
DUST 514 BETA VET
16.2M Lifetime SP
SH4T --> PFBHz --> PFB --> SH4T --> Fatal
|
Centurion mkII
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
175
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 03:16:00 -
[4] - Quote
Piercing Serenity wrote:We have a lot of speculation going on in these forum.
This would be a perfect time for some much needed communication between the Devs and the players.
- What prompted the shield nerf?
- Was there a reason it was released now, as opposed to earlier?
- What was this nerf supposed to accomplish?
- What is the plan moving forwards?
Answers to these questions might not cull the rage on the forums, but it would put it a lot of the thoughts and anger to better use via constructive criticism
I can answer one and three. In eve when you equip shield or armor they both have negatives and strengths. They had said in the past there was intentions to give shields a drawback too. Also I doubt the devs will respond until like a month from now but in a political way that doesn't answer everything or they will never respond its up the air imo. |
Piercing Serenity
Fatal Absolution
440
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 03:19:00 -
[5] - Quote
Centurion mkII wrote:Piercing Serenity wrote:We have a lot of speculation going on in these forum.
This would be a perfect time for some much needed communication between the Devs and the players.
- What prompted the shield nerf?
- Was there a reason it was released now, as opposed to earlier?
- What was this nerf supposed to accomplish?
- What is the plan moving forwards?
Answers to these questions might not cull the rage on the forums, but it would put it a lot of the thoughts and anger to better use via constructive criticism I can answer one and three. In eve when you equip shield or armor they both have negatives and strengths. They had said in the past there was intentions to give shields a drawback too. Also I doubt the devs will respond until like a month from now but in a political way that doesn't answer everything or they will never respond its up the air imo.
I guess I wasn't very clear. by "What was this nerf supposed to accomplish?", I'm asking about what role does this nerf play in the "roadmap" very concretely. If we got some dev response saying: "This nerf is a a precursor to establishing racial trends" or "This nerf is to eliminate pure HP tanking", it would do a lot to end some confusion on the forums
DUST 514 BETA VET
16.2M Lifetime SP
SH4T --> PFBHz --> PFB --> SH4T --> Fatal
|
Son-Of A-Gun
3dge of D4rkness
SoulWing Alliance
502
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 03:20:00 -
[6] - Quote
All you scrubs *****ing about damage mods, so they took a good hard look at DMs Vs. extender balance, and found that it was indeed unbalanced, favoring the shield extenders.
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
Lucrezia LeGrand
Sentinels of New Eden
92
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 03:23:00 -
[7] - Quote
oh. I figured it was because no one used shield regulators and rechargers. |
Xocoyol Zaraoul
Superior Genetics
1582
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 03:28:00 -
[8] - Quote
All this ruckus over a 3% penalty on depleted regen...
Closed Beta Vet
Reading the forums detracts from overall enjoyment of the game
|
Piercing Serenity
Fatal Absolution
440
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 03:44:00 -
[9] - Quote
Xocoyol Zaraoul wrote:All this ruckus over a 3% penalty on depleted regen...
It really isn't ruckus. It is just a bid for CCP to capitalize on a good opportunity to convey their ideas clearly to us, is all. I don't particularly care about the nerf. I'll just play when its fun and stop when its
DUST 514 BETA VET
16.2M Lifetime SP
SH4T --> PFBHz --> PFB --> SH4T --> Fatal
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |