| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Kasote Denzara
A Vulture
1123
   |
Posted - 2013.12.04 12:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
This needs to be answered as soon as possible to put many R/E users at rest or at edge.
Kasote Denzara wrote:If a blue R/E is purposely destroyed by an ally and it kills someone (a blue), who is held responsible? The detonator or the owner? This is a massive "need to know" thing for me at the moment, as well with the other R/E users.
SWEET MOTHER OF TERESA ON THE HOOD OF A MERCEDES BENZ, YOU SOUND LIKE A MAJESTIC EAGLE! DO YOU SING?!
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
2706
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 12:19:00 -
[2] - Quote
Response to this is most welcome.
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja.
Forum Warrior level 2
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
dzizur
Proctology Academy
General Tso's Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 12:20:00 -
[3] - Quote
+1 to that, wondering that myself :) |
Hecarim Van Hohen
Knights of Eternal Darkness
338
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 12:24:00 -
[4] - Quote
I'd imagine that the detonator gets the blame but and Dev response would be nice
Cheer up a bit will you
(n+ëGùòpâ«Gùò)n+ë:n+Ñn+ƒG£º:n+Ñn+ƒG£º
|
CEOPyrex CloneA
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
447
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 12:24:00 -
[5] - Quote
I am more concerned with the orbitals, what if i have to orbital the point to win the match and i take out 3/4 blues (tactical losses indeed) i then get punished because hey people love to be dicks in games right?
Point me to where this isnt going to be a problem someone? |
Rei Shepard
The Rainbow Effect
1273
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 12:27:00 -
[6] - Quote
CEOPyrex CloneA wrote:I am more concerned with the orbitals, what if i have to orbital the point to win the match and i take out 3/4 blues (tactical losses indeed) i then get punished because hey people love to be dicks in games right?
Point me to where this isnt going to be a problem someone?
I tought there werent gonna be orbitals in FW, unless i misread ...
Factional Contract matches will no longer have Warbarge strikes available (They will still be available in Planetary Conquest)
EVE Orbital Strikes in Factional Contract matches and Planetary Conquest matches must now be earned in EVE
Winner of the EU Squad Cup
"Go Go Power Rangers!"
"Accuracy"
|
Keri Starlight
0uter.Heaven
Proficiency V.
1697
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 12:32:00 -
[7] - Quote
CEOPyrex CloneA wrote:I am more concerned with the orbitals, what if i have to orbital the point to win the match and i take out 3/4 blues (tactical losses indeed) i then get punished because hey people love to be dicks in games right?
Point me to where this isnt going to be a problem someone?
You can see the blue dots on the map. Just don't drop the OS on them.
I know, sometimes that would make the difference between a win and a loss, but you have to look at that as a real-life simulation.
I am more concerned about griefing. Friendly fire is just a bad idea, in my honest opinion.
"I load my gun with love instead of bullets"
|
Keri Starlight
0uter.Heaven
Proficiency V.
1697
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 12:33:00 -
[8] - Quote
Rei Shepard wrote:I tought there werent gonna be orbitals in FW, unless i misread ... Quote: Factional Contract matches will no longer have Warbarge strikes available (They will still be available in Planetary Conquest)
EVE Orbital Strikes in Factional Contract matches and Planetary Conquest matches must now be earned in EVE
Orbital Strikes from EVE, Rei.
The squad leader calls the OS when ready.
"I load my gun with love instead of bullets"
|
Rei Shepard
The Rainbow Effect
1274
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 12:34:00 -
[9] - Quote
Keri Starlight wrote:CEOPyrex CloneA wrote:I am more concerned with the orbitals, what if i have to orbital the point to win the match and i take out 3/4 blues (tactical losses indeed) i then get punished because hey people love to be dicks in games right?
Point me to where this isnt going to be a problem someone? You can see the blue dots on the map. Just don't drop the OS on them. I know, sometimes that would make the difference between a win and a loss, but you have to look at that as a real-life simulation. I am more concerned about griefing. Friendly fire is just a bad idea, in my honest opinion.
Yeah there is no doubt gonna be a whole lot of people who wanna grief me :/
Winner of the EU Squad Cup
"Go Go Power Rangers!"
"Accuracy"
|
Rei Shepard
The Rainbow Effect
1274
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 12:37:00 -
[10] - Quote
Keri Starlight wrote:Rei Shepard wrote:I tought there werent gonna be orbitals in FW, unless i misread ... Quote: Factional Contract matches will no longer have Warbarge strikes available (They will still be available in Planetary Conquest)
EVE Orbital Strikes in Factional Contract matches and Planetary Conquest matches must now be earned in EVE Orbital Strikes from EVE, Rei. The squad leader calls the OS when ready.
Those are going to be pretty limited no doubt, i still read orbital as the strike we now have, i went and copied it but i didnt actually read it :p But like you said, its all abot choice, do you kill your blue dots and win or don't and loose, such are the burdens of a commander.
Winner of the EU Squad Cup
"Go Go Power Rangers!"
"Accuracy"
|
|
|
Import Beercase
Beer For Evil Mercs
84
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 12:37:00 -
[11] - Quote
Hey Shieppard is taht you why so blue... look a nade. ti ck t ick tick...
I would like to know who is to blame when vehicles collide.. I once rammed my dropship to a friendly tank and got over 700k of received damage...
I think it was acciden dunno...
"If at first you don't succeed, mccdiving is not for you."
Snowflake in hell those are my odds in ambush
|
Vyzion Eyri
The Southern Legion
The Umbra Combine
2169
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 12:49:00 -
[12] - Quote
Well currently if I shoot an enemy RE whilst my teammate is hacking the objective, they die and the enemy gets the points, so that's probably how it'll turn out here.
Whilst it will certainly lead to the wrong people being blamed for griefing, I suspect this will be a pretty rare case. I'm more worried that we will base too much initial feedback off the first week of 1.7 when everyone is trolling just because of the novelty, and force CCP to make changes to lessen the effects of FF when in reality we are reacting to our own overreaction.
Just putting it out there, guys. Keep your comments in perspective. Personally I would recommend to CCP to simply ignore the first week of threads after the patch hits.
"When nothing is going your way, go out of your way to do nothing."
|
|
CCP FoxFour
C C P
C C P Alliance
14087
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 14:04:00 -
[13] - Quote
The mechanics around this are not changing in 1.7.
If your remote explosive kills a teammate you are held accountable for it.
CCP FoxFour // Game Designer // Team True Grit
http://twitter.com/regnerba
|
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
2713
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 14:05:00 -
[14] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:The mechanics around this are not changing in 1.7.
If your remote explosive kills a teammate you are held accountable for it.
Well ****
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja.
Forum Warrior level 2
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
D34NOS MAZDA
WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL
Top Men.
257
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 14:09:00 -
[15] - Quote
I was going to post this same tread earlier but had work to do.
CCP FoxFour wrote:The mechanics around this are not changing in 1.7.
If your remote explosive kills a teammate you are held accountable for it.
*Shakes head*
Oh Dear I wont be using RE in FW then.
|
Jacques Cayton II
Providence Guard
Templis Dragonaors
195
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 14:14:00 -
[16] - Quote
Um yea I did that for sh!ts and giggles my apologies to those whom I did it to
We fight for the future of the State not our
personal goals
|
calisk galern
BurgezzE.T.F
Public Disorder.
1412
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 14:17:00 -
[17] - Quote
then I guess I won't be using point protection RE's in FW. |
chase rowland
The Enclave Syndicate
Dark Taboo
85
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 14:18:00 -
[18] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:The mechanics around this are not changing in 1.7.
If your remote explosive kills a teammate you are held accountable for it.
too lazy to fix it eh? well its not the first time you guys messed something up... |
Anarchide
Greedy Bastards
1616
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 14:21:00 -
[19] - Quote
Explosive Spam Counter! Yay!  More shooting in the face ensue.
Greedy Bastards' Hate Lord
|
Reav Hannari
Red Rock Outriders
2069
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 14:23:00 -
[20] - Quote
chase rowland wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:The mechanics around this are not changing in 1.7.
If your remote explosive kills a teammate you are held accountable for it. too lazy to fix it eh? well its not the first time you guys messed something up...
What do you mean 'fix it'? If your weapon kills them it doesn't matter how it happens. Remote explosives being detonated by whatever means isn't much different than calling down an orbital on their heads.
// Matari Warrior // Logistics / Scout / Dropship Crash Tester // @ReesNoturana
|
|
|
Acturus Galaxy
Happy Pumpkin
248
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 14:24:00 -
[21] - Quote
chase rowland wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:The mechanics around this are not changing in 1.7.
If your remote explosive kills a teammate you are held accountable for it. too lazy to fix it eh? well its not the first time you guys messed something up...
Why change it? It is an explosive like the grenade, no longer can you detonate it blindfolded but have to stay close to the objective. You have the passive scanner as scout and can easily see if blue dots are close by before you detonate the RE.
We should just be glad proximity mines to not explode when a friendly drives over them or that blue dots cannot* shoot and detonate your RE. At least I presume this is the case as you cannot target blue vehicles with AV grenades and swarmers. I intent to continue using REs in FW. But will be a little more careful now before detonating them. |
chase rowland
The Enclave Syndicate
Dark Taboo
85
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 14:26:00 -
[22] - Quote
Reav Hannari wrote:chase rowland wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:The mechanics around this are not changing in 1.7.
If your remote explosive kills a teammate you are held accountable for it. too lazy to fix it eh? well its not the first time you guys messed something up... What do you mean 'fix it'? If your weapon kills them it doesn't matter how it happens. Remote explosives being detonated by whatever means isn't much different than calling down an orbital on their heads.
I mean is someone shoots your RE, then the idiot that shot it should be blown to bits. THINK before posting and you will find more people supporting you |
Anarchide
Greedy Bastards
1616
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 14:26:00 -
[23] - Quote
Accountance for the **** you unleash. I like this.
Greedy Bastards' Hate Lord
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
2716
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 14:26:00 -
[24] - Quote
.
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja.
Forum Warrior level 2
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Anarchide
Greedy Bastards
1616
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 14:28:00 -
[25] - Quote
...as long as my Repair Tool doesn't heal the enemy
wait...
Greedy Bastards' Hate Lord
|
chase rowland
The Enclave Syndicate
Dark Taboo
86
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 14:29:00 -
[26] - Quote
Acturus Galaxy wrote:chase rowland wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:The mechanics around this are not changing in 1.7.
If your remote explosive kills a teammate you are held accountable for it. too lazy to fix it eh? well its not the first time you guys messed something up... Why change it? It is an explosive like the grenade, no longer can you detonate it blindfolded but have to stay close to the objective. You have the passive scanner as scout and can easily see if blue dots are close by before you detonate the RE. We should just be glad proximity mines to not explode when a friendly drives over them or that blue dots cannot* shoot and detonate your RE. At least I presume this is the case as you cannot target blue vehicles with AV grenades and swarmers. I intent to continue using REs in FW. But will be a little more careful now before detonating them.
if your close to it then why not just kill the red with you weapon? isn't the purpose of RE's ambushing or guarding an objective? or are you so bad at aiming that you need RE's to kill anything? |
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
2719
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 14:30:00 -
[27] - Quote
Acturus Galaxy wrote:chase rowland wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:The mechanics around this are not changing in 1.7.
If your remote explosive kills a teammate you are held accountable for it. too lazy to fix it eh? well its not the first time you guys messed something up... Why change it? It is an explosive like the grenade, no longer can you detonate it blindfolded but have to stay close to the objective. You have the passive scanner as scout and can easily see if blue dots are close by before you detonate the RE.We should just be glad proximity mines to not explode when a friendly drives over them or that blue dots cannot* shoot and detonate your RE. At least I presume this is the case as you cannot target blue vehicles with AV grenades and swarmers. I intent to continue using REs in FW. But will be a little more careful now before detonating them.
You don't need passive scanning upgrades to see friendlies and this is more about the RE getting shot by the enemy or an idiot blue and killing an ally.
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 2
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Anarchide
Greedy Bastards
1616
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 14:31:00 -
[28] - Quote
chase rowland wrote:Reav Hannari wrote:chase rowland wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:The mechanics around this are not changing in 1.7.
If your remote explosive kills a teammate you are held accountable for it. too lazy to fix it eh? well its not the first time you guys messed something up... What do you mean 'fix it'? If your weapon kills them it doesn't matter how it happens. Remote explosives being detonated by whatever means isn't much different than calling down an orbital on their heads. I mean is someone shoots your RE, then the idiot that shot it should be blown to bits. THINK before posting and you will find more people supporting you
When someone jumps in your line of fire (you were not targeting him) or does something stupid (breaking the "Do Not Open" seal on your Remote Explosive), you should not be punished. That is obvlious.
Greedy Bastards' Hate Lord
|
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
2719
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 14:32:00 -
[29] - Quote
chase rowland wrote:Acturus Galaxy wrote:chase rowland wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:The mechanics around this are not changing in 1.7.
If your remote explosive kills a teammate you are held accountable for it. too lazy to fix it eh? well its not the first time you guys messed something up... Why change it? It is an explosive like the grenade, no longer can you detonate it blindfolded but have to stay close to the objective. You have the passive scanner as scout and can easily see if blue dots are close by before you detonate the RE. We should just be glad proximity mines to not explode when a friendly drives over them or that blue dots cannot* shoot and detonate your RE. At least I presume this is the case as you cannot target blue vehicles with AV grenades and swarmers. I intent to continue using REs in FW. But will be a little more careful now before detonating them. if your close to it then why not just kill the red with you weapon? isn't the purpose of RE's ambushing or guarding an objective? or are you so bad at aiming that you need RE's to kill anything?
This is only one of the REs uses, it's also ment to be taking out hostile armor and installations, hence the term 'demolition'.
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 2
STB-Infantry (Demolition)
|
Reav Hannari
Red Rock Outriders
2071
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 14:32:00 -
[30] - Quote
chase rowland wrote:I mean is someone shoots your RE, then the idiot that shot it should be blown to bits. THINK before posting and you will find more people supporting you
Oh, right, THINK. I always forget that part.
I THINK I'll be careful how and when I deploy my REs instead of littering the battlefield with them.
// Matari Warrior // Logistics / Scout / Dropship Crash Tester // @ReesNoturana
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |